透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.224.32.86
  • 學位論文

友誼團體道德發展對青少年道德發展的影響

The Effect of Moral Development of Friendship Group upon Adolescent’s Moral Development

指導教授 : 吳齊殷
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


國內較少人探討青少年的友誼團體與道德發展之關係,研究大都認同友誼團體會強烈影響青少年的行為表現,以及性別、年齡、智力、居住地等因素會影響個人道德發展,但是仍較少研究針對青少年道德認知發展與友誼團體之間的關係進行實證研究。 本研究應用Gibbs的SRM-SF道德發展測量工具,並使用友誼網絡提名策略,就台南市兩所國二學生取樣一百五十一人進行研究分析,其中男性有八十二名,女性有六十九名;居住於都市地區有一百一十九人,鄉鎮地區有三十二人;年齡分佈在十四、十五歲。本研究結果顯示,樣本之國二學生的道德發展階段最多集中於階段三與階段二到階段三的過渡期,樣本全部已脫離階段一,未有達到階段四者。道德發展各因素比較結果如下,一、性別:檢視不同性別之道德發展階段的百分比重,位於較高發展階段的女性比例高於男性,但是Chi-square考驗不存在顯著差異χ2 (4, N=151)=9.04, p>.05;二、居住地:國二學生道德發展分數不存在顯著的城鄉差異t=-.674, p>.05;三、學業表現:比較學業成績次序組別,道德發展分數存在顯著差異,達顯著水準(F=3.547, p<.005),成績越好者,道德發展分數越高。 本研究使用路徑分析檢視友誼團體對道德發展的影響,研究顯示友誼團體有無異性的直接效果為.06,間接效果為.034,總效果為.094,顯示友誼團體女性成員愈多,友誼團體道德發展差異愈低,則個人道德發展分數愈高。

並列摘要


Rarely do people in Taiwan mentioned the connection of friendship group and moral development among adolescents, and most researches indicates that friendship group will strengthen their action significantly, so do the gender, age, intelligent, and residency for moral development of theirs. However, there are not sufficient researches by far to support the relation between their friendship group and moral development. The research below applied to Sociomoral Reflection Measure-Short Form (SRM-SF) of Gibbs simultaneously with tactics which experimenters nominate their friend at 8th grade students in two Tainan schools, which are composes of 82 males and 69 females in gender, 119 urbanites and 32 suburbanites in residency, 14 to 15 in age. The research shows that the moral development of most 8th grade students concerntrates on the transition stage between level 2 & 3, and none in stage 1 & 4. Furtherwise, the result of compared with any factors could be seen below: the first is about the gender, with checking the persantage of moral development stage among sexes, we could see that the females occupies more proportion than males in higher stage, but no significant diversity with the Chi-squaretest (χ2 (4, N=151)=9.04, p>.05); and the second is on the residency, there is no remarkable difference between town and country in their SRM score (t=-.674, p>.05); to the third is about the school work, the group of better studies shows notable divergebce in their high SRM score(F=3.547, p<.005). The research operates the path analysis to analyze the effect of friendship group upon moral development, and it shows that the direct effect of no opposite sexes in friendship group is 0.6, 0.34 in indirecet effect and 0.94 in totall, which we could conclude that the higher female in friendship group, the less variation in moral development of friendship group, the higher in personal moral development degree.

參考文獻


吳明燁、周玉慧,2009,〈台灣青少年的道德信念:社會依附的影響〉。《台灣社會學》17:61-100。
謝雨生、吳齊殷、李文傑,2006,〈青少年網絡特性、互動結構和友誼動態〉。《台灣社會學》11:175-236。
沈六,2001,〈道德發展歸因論〉。《公民訓育學報》10(1):1-28。
陳鳳如、黃漢龍,2010,〈臺中市國小學生的道德發展現況及相關影響因素之研究〉。《臺中教育大學學報》24(1):79-106。
林宜瀅,2003,〈國中道德氣氛與學生道德發展之相關研究〉。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系碩士論文。

延伸閱讀