文化資產保存與否的問題,近年來一直是大家所討論的,尤其當土地面臨開發價值極高的情況時,產業遺址容易在開發操作下遭到消費與犧牲,而普遍的原因則是在於我國對於文化資產的法令制度並不完善。士林紙廠因時代變遷關係,大規模的舊工業用地,被視為不符合都市成長的效益和與土地使用的合理性,因而政府單位希望藉由變更的手段來進行改善,但在進行變更的過程中,發現國內在法令制度面上立法不足,未能給予完善的規範。因此,本研究將以士林紙廠為案例,來探討其制度上不完善之處,並提出建議;其後,透過對士紙勞工及工會的訪談,來了解保存與勞動文化之間的微妙關係與其背後所代表的意義;最後,以阿多諾(Adorno)與霍克海默(Horkheimer)所提出的文化工業理論來批判目前國內將文化視為產業資產,而以再利用的方式來進行操作的狀況,並重新釐清文化工業價值為何。
The subject of culture heritage should be preserved or not has been discussed by everyone in recent years. The industry heritage may be consumed and sacrificed easily when they face with the land development value is high. The general reason lies in the ordinance system of cultural property in my country is not perfect. As times change, the large-scale old industry in Shihlin Paper Factory is seen as that the benefit is not agrees with to match the benefit of city growth and the rationality of land use. The government hopes that can improve the condition by the means of change, but on the process of change we find that can not give perfect protection to protect because the ordinance is not thoughtful. Consequently, this research will take Shihlin paper factory as a case to inquire the imperfection in ordinance, and give some suggest. Besides, through to the process of interview paper labor and the labor union, we can understand the delicate relation of cultural preservation and labor culture. Finally, we will make use of cultural industrial theories that was advanced by Adorno and Horkheimer to criticize that we regard culture as property and use the way of reuse to operate them. I hope to explain what valuable cultural industry is.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。