透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.137.192.3
  • 學位論文

華嚴三祖法藏大師圓教思想研究

The Complete Teaching of Third Right Reverend –FaTzan, of Hua-yen Discipline

指導教授 : 岑溢成
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本論文的主旨在探究華研三祖法藏大師的圓教思想。在過去千餘年中,華嚴宗學的圓教核心,一直被認為是如來藏思想,因此法藏的圓教也被解讀成以如來藏思想收攝諸教的型態。但在法藏判小、始、終、頓、圓五教時,如來藏則僅是終教,而非圓教,這形成了一個極大的矛盾。本論文在研究中發現,法藏的圓教乃是以「主伴圓融觀」為骨幹,進而收攝頓、終、始三教,而成一圓教。因此,認為如來藏思想是法藏圓教之核心思想明顯是個錯誤,而這個錯誤則是起因於四祖澄觀的曲解。在法藏圓教思想的探究中,本論文將法藏的圓教型態判為「本圓格局」,與天台的「後圓格局」成了極為不同的兩種典範。過去有關頓教及同教的定位一直說不清的問題,可以在本圓格局中得到定位。同教是導諸教入別教的過渡型教義,不具有獨立教義,故五教判中沒有同教;頓教則自具有獨立的教法。而為了收攝可說的漸教與不可說的頓教,法藏的圓教以一種特殊的「無盡說」的型態出現,這也同時說明了法藏多觀點論述的方式與其圓教思想的內在關聯。

關鍵字

天台 如來藏 無盡說 牟宗 法藏 華嚴宗

並列摘要


The purpose of this dissertation is to clarify the Complete Teaching(圓教) of FaTzan(法藏), a famous Buddhist monk in ancient China who first stated the main doctrines of Hua-yen Discipline(華嚴宗)and was referred to as Third Right Reverend by Hua-yen followers later. People used to believe that Tathāgatagarbha(如來藏) thoughts in The Awakening of Faith in Mahayana(大乘起信論)embody the main doctrine and the Complete Teaching of Hua-yen Discipline. The famous academician Mou Tsung-san(牟宗三), in his book Buddha Nature and Prajna(佛性與般若), brought up the critical examination of Hua-yen Discipline. As a result, Mou Tsung-san believed that Tathāgatagarbha thoughts embody the main doctrine of the Complete Teaching of the Hua-yen Discipline too. In this dissertation, I argue that Tathāgatagarbha thoughts and the theory of Dependant Origination and Emptiness(緣起性空) are integrated in the Main and the Associate theory(主伴圓融說) of Hua-yen Discipline, and that therefore Tathāgatagarbha thoughts should not be viewed as the only main doctrine of Hua-yen Discipline. Moreover I claim that the Theory of Unlimited Cause of Dharma(無盡緣起) possesses an independent value since it contains the Theory of Truth As Connected with Everything(真如隨緣), and that it can not be viewed as the extension of the Theory of Dependant Origination and Emptiness. In conclusion, the existent description of the Complete Teaching of the Hua-yen Discipline in fact has been a serious misinterpretation.

參考文獻


43、 〈「轉依」二義之研究〉:賴賢宗,《中華佛學學報》第15期(2002.07),頁93-113。
3、 〈法藏《大乘起信論義記》及元曉與見登的相關述記關於一心開二門的闡釋〉:賴賢宗著,中華佛學學報,第十四期,2001.09,頁267-291。
7、 〈從華嚴經學到華嚴宗學〉:魏道儒著,中華佛學學報第12期 ,1999.7月出版 ,頁365~376。
42、 〈依「一心開二門」之思想架構看天台宗「一念無明法性心」之特殊涵義〉:尤惠貞,《中華佛學學報》第10期,頁341-361。
9、 〈就《華嚴法界觀門》論華嚴思想之演變〉:陳英善著,中華佛學學報第八期,1995.07 出版, 頁373~396。

被引用紀錄


高淑慧(2011)。《華嚴經》明地菩薩之禪定修行──以華嚴宗之思想為主〔碩士論文,法鼓文理學院〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6819/DILA.2011.00006
林益丞(2017)。清涼澄觀《華嚴經疏》與《隨疏演義鈔》之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201701561
徐敏媛(2007)。法藏圓教思想研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-2910200810550561
陳舒亦(2010)。天台化儀四教研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315204326
徐敏媛(2012)。天臺與華嚴二宗判教思想研究-以詮釋學為核心展開〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315272990

延伸閱讀