公務人員保障法中暫時權利保護問題之研究

A STUDY ON TEMPORARY REMEDY SYSTEM OF CIVIL SERVICE PROTECTION ACT

林致吟(CHIH-YIN LIN)

指導教授 ： 張桐銳

國立中央大學/客家學院/法律與政府研究所/碩士(2012年)

摘要

大法官解釋第六五三號與六八四號之作成，突顯出特別權力關係與我國行政法學上已遭突破，除了可能造成對於最高行政法院見解之影響，並且對於公務人員保障法，亦有衝擊。本文主要探討在特別權力關係遭到突破後的公務人員保障法(下稱保障法)，有無引進假處分之必要及停止執行制度之分析與探討。藉由歸納整理最高行政法院對於暫時權利保護制度體系與運作之見解，說明最高行政法院對於暫時權利保護要件之內涵與判斷標準，作為保障法救濟途徑之設計與操作之對照組。並在分析保障事件後，除認保障法有引入假處分制度外，並應於復審程序中增定拒絕申請課予義務復審之類型
。且就停止執行制度之操作，可參酌我國最高行政法院與比較法中對於停止執行之審查模式、利益衡量因素之發展，以避免純粹的利益衡量。始達我國憲法第十六條「有權利即有救濟」與保障法「確保公務人員之權益，提供有效權利保護」之意旨。

關鍵字

利益衡量 ； 課予義務復審 ； 假處分 ； 訴訟權 ； 有效權利保護 ； 暫時權利保護制度 ； 停止執行

並列摘要

With denotation formed from J.Y .Interpretation No.653 and No.684 being made by Grand Justices, special power relationship（besodere Gewaltverhältnisse）seems to be broken through. The consequence may affect the opinion of Supreme administrative courts, and it may be in conflict with Civil Service Protection Act .This thesis mainly discusses that whether Civil Service Protection Act should be reformed about suggestions for injunctions and how its suspension of enforcement should be apply after the special power relationship（besodere Gewaltverhältnisse） has been break through. Moreover, this thesis generalizes the decisions on Temporary remedy system, which is made by Supreme administrative courts, to illustrate the content and criteria about element of Temporary remedy system. And the Civil Service Protection Act can compare with Administrative Litigation Act to construct the detailed provisions of Judicial remedy .After analysis of the Civil Service Protection cases, I comment that Legal reform may introduce injunctions system), and propose to extend another deliberation category of litigations as Administrative Actions for Effecting. In addition, the analysis —how does the suspension of enforcement system operate ,can refer to the balancing test ,which is the examination model by the Supreme administrative court in Taiwan. The balancing test is also introduced by comparative law ,which plays a particularly influential role to avoid a mere consideration of interest. Such reform could help Our legal system to achieve the objectives -“where there is a right , there is a remedy ” ,which appear in Article 16 of Constitution Law ,as well as the purpose of Civil Service Protection Act regulates that“attempts to ensure protecting the rights and interests of civil servants, and provides efficient right-protection ”.

並列關鍵字

Tempo ； efficient right-protection ； right of action

參考文獻

二、定暫時狀態假處分程序

吳庚，〈行政訴訟中各類訴訟之關係〉，《法令月刊》，第49卷，第11期，

行政院秘書處，100年10月，頁23-70。

陳英鈐，〈從有效權利保護論公法上假處分－與最高行政法院的裁定對話〉，

index. asp。