摘 要 自從民國76年政府開放民眾赴大陸探親以來,兩岸關係有了重大改變,由早期的對峙局勢,逐漸趨於緩和,但由於兩岸同文同種,民族習性、語言、風俗相近等特色,導致近年來在兩岸互動日趨頻密與科技發展的影響下,衍生許多治安問題,造成兩岸社會動盪不安,此外,許多刑事犯及幫派犯罪組織分子在台犯罪後紛紛潛逃大陸或與大陸黑幫相互串聯從事不法犯罪活動,對兩岸治安亦造成相當重大的影響,爰此,本文擬從跨境犯罪與刑事司法互助之概念出發,透過美國政治學者伊斯頓(David Easton)的「系統理論」及應用政策分析(policy analysis)之工具,融入學者宋學文教授所建構之「(3+1)i決策模型」,期能透過此一理論模型,建構一套動態的分析架構,以探討海峽兩岸打擊跨境犯罪之政策制訂與發展,並審視1990年雙方在金門簽署之「金門協議」、2005年雙方在澳門建立「兩岸警方共同打擊犯罪聯繫機制」及2009年「第三次江陳會談簽訂海峽兩岸共同打擊犯罪及司法互助協議」之海峽兩岸刑事司法互助現狀,以瞭解雙方共同打擊犯罪所面臨的實務困境,進而提出未來海峽兩岸跨境犯罪可能之解決途徑,藉以提供後續研究及有關單位處理問題之參考。
Abstract Since 1987, the cross-straight relationship has changed significantly from the government opening for public to visit their relatives, from the early confrontation to the easier situation. But because of the same nature and culture between cross-straight, the criminal problems emerge with the influence of cross-straight frequent interaction and technology development, resulting the cross-straight society in a turbulent situation. In addition, many criminals commit crimes in Taiwan and flee to China, which has influenced the cross-straight security significantly. Thus, this thesis uses Prof. David Easton’s “system theory” and Prof. Soong, Hseik-Wen’s (3+1)i decision-making model and from the concept of transnational crimes and criminal justice to construct a dynamic analytical framework to discuss the policy of cross-straight cooperation in fighting transnational crimes, and takes the references of “Jinmen Agreement” signed in 1990, “the Institutionalized Joint Crime-Fighting Cooperation Mechanism between the Two Sides Police” in 2005, the other is the “Cross-Strait Agreement on Joint Crime-Fighting and Judicial Mutual Assistance” signed in 2009 to understand the dilemma of both sides cooperation in combating crimes. Finally, this thesis presents the solution to the future cross-straight transnational crimes to the follow-up researches.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。