本研究選取國內20個高層建築集合住宅案例為研究對象,採用綠建築評估系統EEWH與LEED對案例進行評估,探討各案例在EEWH與LEED評估系統得分分佈與項目差異性;為了達成評估有效性,EEWH評估內容採用達成率作為得分計算方式;其次探討各案例在EEWH與LEED各指標所應用之評估項目等級差異性及有無相關性。 就所得案例分析結論如下:1.國內EEWH評估系統區分五等級,指標包含九大指標採基本合格制;美國LEED評估系統區分為四等級,六大項67個指標採得分方式為累積計分評定等級。2.國內案例進行LEED評估系統得分集中於三項目指標,國內案例進行EEWH評估系統得分集中於六指標。3.國內案例以LEED評估系統與EEWH評估系統進行評估,顯示整體是不具相關性;在LEED節水指標與EEWH健康(水資源指標)是具有相關性。
This study selected 20 high-rise buildings of congregate housing in Taiwan as the subjects, and used green building rating system EEWH and LEED to perform assessments on the subjects to investigate the distribution of scores and difference in assessment criteria of the subjects in EEWH and LEED rating systems. To obtain the assessment of acceptable validity, EEWH used achieving rate for scoring. Moreover, this study also investigated if there is level difference and any correlation among assessment criteria. The findings are as follows: 1) The EEWH rating system in Taiwan is a 5-grade system including 9 major criteria where basic eligibility criteria are applied; the U.S. LEED assessment system is a 4-grade system including 6 major criteria and 67 indices where total score is used for grade rating; 2) the subjects in Taiwan assessed by LEED rating system obtained the highest scores in 3 criteria, and those assessed by EEWH rating system obtained the highest scores in 6 criteria; 3) the results showed that there is no significant correlation between the overall subjects in Taiwan assessed by LEED rating system and those assessed by EEWH rating system. There is a correlation between the water-saving criterion of LEED and health (water resource criterion) of EEWH.