透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.178.157
  • 期刊

健身運動參與動機量表的編製

The Development of Motivation for the Exercise Inventory

摘要


本研究之目的在於探索健身運動參與動機的內涵,並發展出一份具有信效度的健身運動參與動機量表。整個編製過程分為下列二個階段:第一階段主要以Cash等(1994)之健身運動參與原因量表(Reasons for Exercise Inventory)為藍本,並參考其他文獻將健身運動參與動機分作體適能/健康管理、外表/體重管理、壓力/情緒管理、社交/休閒、以及重要他人的影響五個因素,共37題。以205位個人項目的健身運動參與者為預試對象,採探索性因素分析進行初步量表的信、效度考驗。第二階段以400位健身運動參與者為研究對象,採驗證性因素分析(LISREL 8.52版)考驗量表假設性測量模式與各分量表的構面是否適配。研究結果發現:一、健身運動參與動機量表包括體適能/健康管理、外表/體重管理、壓力/情緒管理、社交/休閒四個分量表,共有19題,累積解釋變異量為52.33%。各因素Cronbach α介於0.78~0.84,全量表為0.79,顯示本量表具有良好的建構效度與信度。二、正式施測之驗證性因素分析顯示四個分量表分別代表四個不同的潛在變項,修改後的量表模式適合度良好,具有良好的建構效度(χ^2(下標 (144))=157.25, χ^2/df=1.09, GFI=0.96, RMR=0.10, AGFI=0.95, RMSEA=0.02, NFI=0.87, NNFI=0.99, CFI=0.99)。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to identify the motivation for exercise and to develop a reliable and valid inventory. This study was conducted in two phases. In phase one, the preliminary conceptual basis for motivation for exercise was derived from Reasons for Exercise Inventory (Cash et al., 1994) and other literatures. The preliminary Motivation for Exercise Inventory (MET) contained 37 items with five sub-scales: Fitness/Health Management, Appearance/Weight Management, Stress/Emotion Management, Social/Leisure, Impact from Significant Other. 205 participants participated in the individual exercise in the preliminary study. The exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach α were used to examine the validity and reliability. In phase two, there were 400 participants who participated in the exercise. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to examine the goodness-of-fit of the hypothetical measurement model. The results of this study indicated that: 1. The final vision of Motivation for Exercise Inventory contained 19 items with four sub-scales: Fitness/Health Management, Appearance/Weight Management, Stress/Emotion Management, Social/Leisure. The four sub-scales accounted for 52.33% of total variance, and the Cronbach a coefficient was 0.79. The Cronbach α coefficients of four sub-scales ranged from 0.78 to 0.84. The results of MEI revealed an acceptable reliability and construct validity. 2. The results of CFA indicated that the modified model of MEI fitted the data (χ^2(subscript (144))=157.25, χ^2/df=1.09, GFI=0.96, RMR=0.10, AGFI=0.95, RMSEA=0.02, NFI=0.87, NNFI=0.99, CFI=0.99).

參考文獻


Brown, T.,Cash, T. P.,Mikulka, P.(1990).Attitudmal body-image assessment: Factor analysis of the body-self relations questionnaire..Journal of Personality Assessment.55,135-144.
Byrne, B. M.(1989).A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models..
Cai, S.(2000).Physical exercise and mental health: A content integrated approach in coping with college students' anxiety and depression..Physical Education.57(2),69-76.
Cash, T. F.(1989).Body image affect: Gestalt versus summing the parts..Perceptual and Motor Skills.69,17-18.
Cash, T. F.(1994).The Situational Inventory of Body-image Dysphoria: Contextual assessment of a negative body image..The Behavior Therapist.17,133-134.

被引用紀錄


劉怡汶(2020)。南投縣樂齡學習中心中高齡者運動保健課程參與動機、自我效能與成功老化關係之研究〔碩士論文,國立暨南國際大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6837/ncnu202000158
余政達(2010)。健行運動參與者之參與動機與休閒效益關係研究〔碩士論文,長榮大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6833/CJCU.2010.00001
詹庭任(2019)。以互動式體感遊戲輔助高齡者大肌肉與執行功能訓練之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU201900884
吳蕙如、沈緯鈞、廖主民(2023)。歸屬需求量表中文化編製與法則網絡體育學報56(3),299-317。https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.202309_56(3).0004
謝惠紅、劉冠璋、鄭光偉、張惠英(2021)。台灣中老年族群主觀健康、休閒運動參與動機、效益與幸福感差異與相關性之研究運動休閒管理學報18(1),78-98。https://doi.org/10.6214/JSRM.202106_18(1).0005

延伸閱讀