台灣離島大專學生休閒參與動機與滿意之相關研究

Correlation between Leisure Motivation and Leisure Satisfaction among College Students of Outlying Islands in Taiwan

黃仲凌(Chung-Ling Huang) ； 高俊雄(Chin-Hsung Kao)

《大專體育學刊》 7卷1期 (2005/03) Pp. 51-66

https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.200503_7(1).0004

摘要

本研究目的有四：一、了解離島大專學生之休閒參與的動機與滿意；二、探討個人背景變項在休閒動機的差異；三、探討個人背景變項在休閒滿意的差異；四、探討休閒動機與滿意之相關。研究對象為澎湖與金門兩所大專院校學生365名，研究工具採自編之休閒動機量表及改編之休閒滿意量表進行施測，資料處理以描述性統計、獨立樣本t考驗、單因子變異數分析及皮爾森積差相關進行分析。研究結果發現：一、離島大專學生之休閒參與滿意度，整體呈現正向滿意的感受；而休閒動機以內在動機最高，其次為認同規範、投入規範、無動機及外在規範。二、個人背景變項在休閒動機的差異情形：性別在「投入規範」及「認同規範」上有差異；參與頻率在「無動機」及「內在動機」上有差異；活動類型在「無動機」、「投入規範」及「認同規範」上有差異；參與型態在「無動機」、「投入規範」、「認同規範」及「內在動機」上有差異。三、個人背景變項在休閒滿意的差異情形：「參與型態」及「參與頻率」分別在休閒滿意上有差異。四、五種休閒動機與休閒滿意之相關皆達顯著差異，其中休閒滿意與「無動機」、「外在規範」及「投入規範」呈現負相關，而與「認同規範」及「內在動機」呈現正相關。

關鍵字

休閒動機 ； 休閒滿意

並列摘要

The purposes of this study was: (1) to explore the college students' leisure motivation and satisfaction; (2) to compare the differences of leisure motivation among different backgrounds of college students; (3) to compare the differences of leisure satisfaction among different backgrounds of college students, and (4) to examine the relationship between leisure motivation and satisfaction. A total of 365 valid sample subjects of college students from NPIT and NKIT were used as subjects. The Leisure Motivation Scale was developed by this study and Leisure Satisfaction Scale was based on the study of Kao (1993). Descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson product-moment correlation were conducted for the statistical analyses. The results were as follows: (1) The college students perceived positive satisfaction during leisure participation. The primary leisure motivation for college students was intrinsic motivation, and in turn were identified regulation, introjected regulation, amotivation, and external regulation. (2) There were significant differences in introjected regulation and identified regulation between different genders. Some significant differences were found in amotivation and intrinsic motivation among the four different frequencies of participation. Other significant differences were found in amotivation, introjected regulation, and identified regulation between different types of activities. There were also significant differences in amotivation, introjected regulation, identified regulation, and intrinsic motivation between different types of participation. (3) Both of participated types and participated frequencies showed significant differences in leisure satisfaction. (4) The correlations between the five types of leisure motivations and leisure satisfaction were significantly different, in which identified regulation and intrinsic motivation were positively correlated with leisure satisfaction, whereas amotivation, external regulation, and introjected regulation were negatively correlated with leisure satisfaction.

並列關鍵字

leisure motivation ； leisure satisfaction

參考文獻

林季燕、季力康(2003)。運動動機量表之編製-信度與效度分析。台灣運動心理學報。2，15-32。

黃振紅(2004)。不同學制技職生休閒運動之差異研究。大專體育學刊。6(2)，67-78。

Baldwin, C. K.,Caldwell, L. L.(2003).Development of the free time motivation scale for adolescents..Journal of Leisure Research.35,129-151.

Beard, J, G.,Ragheb, M. G.(1980).Measuring leisure satisfaction..Journal of Leisure Research.12,20-33.

Biddle, S.,Bailey, C.(1985).Motives for participation and attitudes to wards physical activity of adult participants in fitness programs..Perceptual and Motor Kills.61,831-834.