透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.236.219.157
  • 期刊

論動力車輛事故之侵權行為責任、責任保險與無過失補償:以經濟抑制理論為基礎

Automobile Accidents: Tort Law, Liability Insurance, and No-Fault Compensation from the Perspective of Economic Deterrence Theory

摘要


於國內過去民事法學研究上,關於侵權行為與保險制度間之互動關係甚少相關文獻加以探討。因此本文乃以侵權行為理論中涉及侵權行為與保險制度兩者間關係之學說為基礎,亦即分別論述事業責任理論與經濟抑制理論對於兩者互動關係之探討。以事業責任理論為例,主張此說之學者多強調傳統過失責任為基礎之侵權行為無法適用於現代侵權行為類型,因此倡議應以全面性社會補償制度取代侵權行為對於損害補償之功能。經濟抑制理論學者則另強調侵權行為之重要機能為抑制事故之發生,因此著重探討不同侵權行為規範下所產生之抑制效果。當不同侵權行為規範對於加害人、被害人以及社會財富產生抑制影響時,責任保險與無過失補償制度之出現則反而降低原先侵權行為規範之抑制機能。本文即以經濟抑制理論為基礎探討現行動力車輛交通事故下侵權行為與強制汽車責任保險間之互動關係。而立法改革上無過失補償制度漸有倡議者之同時,本文亦藉由實證研究結果之歸納,探討無過失補償對於侵權行為抑制機能之影響及其間接造成死亡事故率之增加。同時亦認為如欲導入無過失補償制度時,則更為完善之費率機制以及適當之交通罰則為應先考量之方法,藉此以降低無過失補償制度所可能產生之問題。

並列摘要


From the traditional civil law legal research in Taiwan, the legal-economic analysis concerning the relationship between liability insurance and the tort system has seldom been carried out. As a result, this study will be based on the discussion regarding two tort theories in U.S., namely enterprise liability theory and economic deterrence theory. Enterprise liability theorists mainly advocate the abolition of the fault system in favor of social insurance scheme. In contrast, economic deterrence theorists provide a view to analyze deterrence effect of different tort rules and to address the main function of tort law, which should give an incentive to a reduction of total social costs of accidents. As the effects of torts rules may influence on the injuries’ behavior, victims' behavior and social welfare, liability insurance and no-fault compensation might significant influence these effects. Based on the economic deterrence theory, this paper reviews the current legal system relating to automobile accidents. While the legal issue regarding the no-fault compensation is emerging, several empirical evidences can be found that no-fault compensation might distort the deterrence effect offered by tort law and would possible increase in fatal accident rates. In this regard, it is suggested that better experiences rating plans and an appropriate set of penalties would mitigate higher accident rates in the adoption of no-fault compensation.

參考文獻


陳忠五(2005)。法國交通事故損害賠償法的發展趨勢:以一九八五年七月五日法律的改革為中心。臺大法學論叢。34(1),81-184。
(1965).(Restatement (Second) of Torts).
World Wide Web
Abraham, K. S.(2005).Liability insurance and accident prevention: The evolution of an idea.Maryland Law Review.64,573-612.
Atiyah, P. S.(1997).The damages lottery.Hart (UK):

被引用紀錄


陳介然(2017)。受僱者工作傷病補償責任歸屬:司法判決分析與法律醫學專業人士問卷調查〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342%2fNTU201700374
何克凡(2015)。強制汽車責任保險法汽車交通事故之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342%2fNTU.2015.00690
吳英志(2012)。從我國董事民事責任之現況論董事責任保險與公司補償制度〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342%2fNTU.2012.10728
陳琬渝(2009)。論強制醫療責任保險—從立法的觀點評析強制醫療責任保險法草案〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342%2fNTU.2009.00615
劉北芳(2013)。論直接請求權在任意責任保險下之定位及相關問題之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-2808201302152700

延伸閱讀