簡明復原力量表中文版之信效度研究－以小兒麻痺患者為例

簡明復原力量表（Brief Resilience Scale, BRS）中文版之信效度分析。研究設計：本研究使用量化研究法，採用探索性和驗證性因素分析。研究對象：共計157位台灣參與非營利組織的小兒麻痺患者參與本研究。研究結果：統計分析結果指出，中文版BRS為二因素結構模式，可解釋之變異量高達82%，且二因素結構模式呈現最佳適配度（χ2/df=2.14、CFI= .98、RMSEA=0.08）。兩個因素的命名分別為：復原力（resilience）與屈服（succumbing）。復原力因素之內部一致性信度為.86，屈服因素之內部一致性信度為.75。復原力因素與憂鬱症狀頻率感受度呈現中度負相關，並與整體生活滿意度呈現中度正相關。屈服因素與憂鬱症狀頻率感受度呈現低度正相關，並與整體生活滿意度呈現低度負相關。結論：英文版BRS量表經中文化之後，以台灣參與非營利組織的小兒麻痺患者為研究對象進行信效度分析，本研究結果顯示中文版BRS二因素結構可解釋高達82%之變異量。中文版BRS可做為正向心理學之心理計量工具，並於復健諮商研究與實務領域中用以評量個體之心理復原力。

關鍵字

復原力；正向心理學；小兒麻痺；復健諮商

並列摘要

Objective: To evaluate the measurement structure of the Taiwanese version of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Design: A quantitative descriptive research design using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Participants: One hundred and fifty-seven Taiwanese with polio participated in this study. Results: EFA results indicated a two-factor structure accounting for 82% of the total variance. CFA results indicated that the two-factor correlated model fits the data very well, with χ^2/df=1.72, GFI= .97, CFI= .98, and RMSEA= 0.06. The internal consistency reliability coefficients for the resilience and succumbing factors were .86 and .75 respectively. The resilience factor correlated negatively with depression and positively with life satisfaction. The succumbing factor correlated positively with depression and negatively with life satisfaction. Conclusion: The Taiwanese version of the BRS can be used as a positive psychology measure to assess resilience in the settings of rehabilitation counseling research and practice.

並列關鍵字

resilience ； positive psychology ； polio ； rehabilitation counseling

國際替代計量

簡明復原力量表中文版之信效度研究－以小兒麻痺患者為例

全文下載

主題瀏覽