東亞安全困境為何不易緩解？無政府秩序形態演進與中國崛起制約

自冷戰結束以來，東亞地區政治與經濟呈現大幅背離，以致安全困境始終未能有效緩解。本文從Barry Buzan無政府狀態論述，指出其背景在於自二次大戰結束以來東亞日漸形成以主權國家為核心之無政府秩序形態，東亞國家習於以權力平衡確保主權與安全，以致東亞區域結構緊張，相互依賴的安全溢出作用受限。冷戰結束以來，中國崛起過於快速導致東亞國家間實力不對稱性擴大，反而深化東亞總體關係由於國家類型、意識形態和領土因素綜合呈現之敵意性，中國睦鄰外交實踐的友善效應更因而被稀釋，安全建制亦因而無法在促進東亞安全困境緩解上發揮明確效益。

關鍵字

安全困境；無政府狀態；相互依賴；中國崛起

並列摘要

Current increasing tensions in the Korean Peninsula and South China Sea show that political and economic dimensions in East Asia diverge drastically and security dilemma remains acute. This article will re-examine the basic security dilemma hypothesis, which presumes an anarchical status of international community. Neo-realist, neo-liberalist and constructionist schools agree that an anarchical status does not mean chaotic orderlessness. Barry Buzan indicates that international anarchy will evolve itself into a more mature phase and thereby alleviate tension caused by security dilemma. Interdependence is widely regarded as an effective variable enabling this evolution. The problem then is that interdependence is not free from the constraint of real-political power logics. This constraint deepens as the contemporary nation-state system of world politics expands, and as the interaction between security structures of various regions exposes their differences. This article argues that the difficulty in alleviating tension in East Asian security dilemma is inherited from the regional anarchy based on the nation-state system since the end of WWII, and complicated by the balance of power East Asian states were accustomed to in insuring security during the Cold War. After the end of Cold War, China's rise deepens this dilemma and thus constrains the evolution of East Asian anarchy to maturity. China's swift rise apparently expands asymmetry of national strengths within the region, manifests animosity caused by differences in statehood, ideologies and territorial disputes, and thereby worsens the sense of insecurity in the region, including China itself. More importantly, China's rise cancels some effects of its alleged policy of amity towards its neighbors, leading to another dilemma in security strategic choices in the future.

並列關鍵字

Security Dilemma ； Anarchy ； Interdependence ； China's Rise

參考文獻

BBC 中文網（BBC），2004，〈童倩：更多民眾對中國印象不良〉，http://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/simp/world/2014/09/140909_japan_poll_china，查閱時間：2014/11/11。BBC. 2004. “Tong Qian: Geng Duo Minzhong Dui Zhongguo Yinxiang Bu Liang” [Tong, Qian: More People are in Disfavor of China].（Accessed on November 11, 2014）.

Google Scholar

于青，2008。〈東海共識：中日互利雙贏〉，《人民日報》。http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrbhwb/html/2008-06/20/content_43168.htm，查閱時間：2017/8/25。Yu, Oing, 2008. “Donghai Gongzhi: Zhong Ri Huli Shuangying” [East China Sea Consensus: Sino-Japanese Mutual Benefit and Win-Win Situation].（Accessed on July 25, 2017）

Google Scholar

中國評論新聞網，2009，〈李光耀：美應續主導亞洲事務否則被中國取代〉，http://www.chinareviewnews.com/doc1011/1/8/0/101118054.html? coluid=93&kindid=2779&docid=101118054，查閱時間：2014/10/28。China Review News. 2009. “Li Guang-yao：Mei Ying Xu Zhudao Yazhou Shiwu Fouze Bei Zhongguo Qudai” [The United States Continued to be the Dominant Asian Affairs Otherwise be Substituted with China].（Accessed on October 28, 2014）.

Google Scholar

中國評論新聞網，2016，〈日媒：日戰機對華緊急起飛次數創新高〉，http://www.zhgpl.com/doc/1041/0/0/1/104100171.html?coluid=218&kindid=11713&docid=104100171&mdate=0125164757，查閱時間2016/1/25。China Review News. 2016. “Ri Mei: Ri Zhanji Dui Hua Jinji Qifei Cishu Chuang Xingao” [Japanese Media: Japanese Fighters Scrambled to Intercept China High Frequency].（Accessed on January 25, 2016）.

Google Scholar

中國新聞網，2011，〈十二五經濟發展科學化：民生幸福是最終目標〉，http://lianghui.china.com.cn/2011/2011-03/14/content_22133792.htm，查閱時間：2014/3/14。ChinaNews.com.2011. “Shier Wu Jingji Fazhan Ke xuehua: Minsheng Xingfu Shi Zuizhong Mubiao”[Twelfth Five-Year Plan: Economic Development Scientific, People's Livelihood and Well-Being is the Ultimate Goal].（Accessed on March 14, 2014）

Google Scholar

國際替代計量

東亞安全困境為何不易緩解？無政府秩序形態演進與中國崛起制約

全文下載

主題瀏覽