透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.218.129.100
  • 期刊

Opening the Black Box: A Two-Dimensional Model of Authoritarian Leadership and Task Performance

掀開神秘的面紗:雙向度威權領導與工作績效

本篇文章尚未正式出版,請點選「加入追蹤」跟進後續出版資訊!

摘要


本研究旨在探討雙向度威權領導的不同效果,及其影響工作績效的中介歷程,並進一步假設工作動力是其間的中介因子。研究者透過問卷調查,回收332份有效問卷。研究結果顯示,尚嚴領導對工作績效不具有預測效果,卻會透過工作動力產生正向間接效果;專權領導對工作績效具有負向預測效果,並會透過工作動力產生負向間接效果。本研究發現尚嚴與專權領導影響工作績效的中介效果,恰好具有一正一負的相反作用,更進一步指出採用雙向度威權領導模式,並檢驗其對結果變項的區分效果,具有理論與實務的價值。最後,針對研究意涵、研究限制、未來研究方向及實務應用加以闡述。

關鍵字

威權領導 紀律 支配 工作動力 工作績效

並列摘要


The present study examined the differential effects of two-dimensional authoritarian leadership with respect to task performance, and proposed driven to work as an underlying mechanism. The results from 332 employees indicated that discipline-focused authoritarian leadership had a non-significant impact on task performance, while it had a positive indirect effect on task performance through driven to work. Dominance-focused authoritarian leadership related negatively to task performance and had a negative indirect effect on task performance via driven to work. These findings demonstrate that research and practice will benefit from distinguishing the construct domains of authoritarian leadership and exploring their differential effects. Finally, we discuss the implications of the research findings, limitations, future research directions, and practice.

參考文獻


Cheng, B. S.、Chou, L. F.、Farh, J. L.(2000)。A triad model of paternalistic leadership: Constructs and measurement。Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies。14,3-64。
Cheng, B. S.、Lin, T. T.、Cheng, H. Y.、Chou, L. F.、Jen, C. K.、Farh, J. L.(2010)。Paternalistic leadership and employee effectiveness: A multiple-level-of-analysis perspective。Chinese Journal of Psychology。52,1-23。
Anderson, J. C.,Gerbing, D. W.(1991).Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities.Journal of Applied Psychology.76,732-740.
Aryee, S.,Chen, Z. X.,Sun, L. Y.,Debrah, Y. A.(2007).Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model.Journal of Applied Psychology.92,191-201.
Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.

被引用紀錄


王本玫(2017)。主管威權領導對部屬恐懼反應與職場偏差行為之研究-信任的調節效果〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201700036
周婉茹(2016)。教誨而非謾罵:華人組織言教領導的概念建構與效度分析〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201600366
林孟君(2015)。威權領導真的令人服從嗎? 雙向度威權領導的效能與仁慈領導的調節作用〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.10639
黃義翔、張家銘(2023)。運動情境中威權領導行為之探討嘉大體育健康休閒期刊22(2),93-105。https://doi.org/10.6169/NCYUJPEHR.202312_22(2).0006
鄭昱宏、周婉茹、周德賢、鄭伯壎(2019)。教練威權領導一定不好嗎?一項權變概念的提出與驗證中華心理學刊61(2),97-129。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.201906_61(2).0002

延伸閱讀