績效薪資改革的盲點：制度邏輯的新視角

The Blind Spot of Performance-Related Pay Reform: An Institutional Logic Perspective

翁晶晶(Jingjing Weng) ； 謝英哲(Ying-Che Hsieh)

《中山管理評論》 27卷1期 (2019/03) Pp. 139-178

https://doi.org/10.6160/SYSMR.201903_27(1).0004

摘要

績效薪資是廣泛應用的員工激勵機制，透過將薪酬與績效掛鉤，激勵員工、提高績效，進而提升組織競爭力。過去關於教師績效薪資的研究多著重分析績效薪資對教師工作動機的影響，卻忽略實施績效薪資的過程中，制度環境對於薪資設計與改革推行的影響。本研究透過制度邏輯視角，採用個案研究法來分析公立學校績效薪資改革之過程，了解改革前後不同邏輯所造成的影響。理論上，本文提出績效薪資制度的設計和推行，會受到組織內外制度環境中不同邏輯的制約，進而影響績效薪資制度的樣貌和實施效果。實務上，本研究建議，推行薪資改革前需釐清不同邏輯的訴求和潛在的衝突，並保留一定的彈性，才到達到績效薪資的預期效益。

關鍵字

制度理論 ； 制度邏輯 ； 績效薪資 ； 教師薪資

並列摘要

Performance-related pay (PRP) is a system that links pay to performance, aiming to motivate employees to improve their performance and therefore increase organizational competitiveness. Previous research on PRP for schoolteachers has usually focused on its impact on their motivation, while tending to neglect the influence of the institutional environment on the design of pay systems and implementation of reform. Taking a case study approach, this study analyzes the PRP system reform in two public junior high schools, exploring how different institutional logics embedded within the institutional environment of the schools impacted the PRP system design and reform implementation. This research illustrates the key phenomenon and underlying rationale behind the PRP reform in public schools in China, proposing that the conflicts between different institutional logics formed a blind spot in the reform which restricted the functional design of the PRP system and led to imperfections in the reform. In practice, our findings suggest that, before implementing pay system reform, it is critical to identify the demands of each institutional logic and analyze potential conflicts between them. When introducing a PRP system, it is important to leave a certain amount of flexibility in the choice of pay range in order to achieve the desired motivational impact.

並列關鍵字

Institutional Theory ； Institutional Logic ； Performance-related Pay ； Teachers' Pay

參考文獻

吳清在、施念恕、朱靜玉，2014，「台灣地區大學教授薪資待遇之合理性初探：大，中，小學教師之比較研究」，臺大管理論叢，24卷2期：1~52。(Wu, T. Z., Shih, N. S., and Chu, C. Y., 2014, “On the Equity of University Professor’s Compensation: A Comparative Study on Compensations of University Professors and High/Elementary School Teachers in Taiwan,” NTU Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 2, 1-52.)

涂敏芬，2012，「對抗制度的創新：策略行動者的能動性實踐」，臺大管理論叢，22卷2期：87~118。(Tu, M. F., 2012, “Innovating Against the Institutional Constraints: The Agency of Strategic Actors,” NTU Management Review, Vol. 22, No. 2, 87-118.)

涂敏芬、洪世章，2016，「建構服務創新的制度工作」，臺大管理論叢，27卷1期：129~154。(Tu, M. F. and Hung, S. C., 2016, “Institutional Work in Building Service Innovation,” NTU Management Review, Vol. 27, No. 1, 129-154.)

許文宗、王俊如，2013，「組織間模仿與關係專屬性投資–績效期望之干擾效果」，中山管理評論，21卷3期：661~688。(Hsu, W. T. and Wang, C. J., 2013, “Inter-Organizational Imitative Behavior and Relationship-Specific Investment: The Moderating Effect of Performance Aspiration,” Sun Yat-sen Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 3, 661-688.)

蔡依倫、高明瑞，2013，「制度變遷與組織型態創設：身心障礙者社會企業的浮現歷程研究」，中山管理評論，21卷2期：339~368。(Tsai, I. L. and Kao, M. R., 2013, “Institutional Changes and New Organizational Forms Creation: The Emergence of the Disability Social Enterprises,” Sun Yat-sen Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 2, 339-368.)