The Fallible Nation as Image of the State: An Analysis of Max Weber's ＂Social Action Approach＂ and its Implications for IR

Richard Ian Wright

《Tamkang Journal of International Affairs》 22卷1期 (2018/07) Pp. 69-168

https://doi.org/10.6185/TJIA.V.201807_22(1).0003

摘要

One of the great strengths of the ＂unitary-purposive actor＂ model is that it facilitates the analytical isolation of systemic constraints on state behavior. However, drawbacks of the model include its exclusion of domestic politics, which leads to an inability to conceptualize state agency, and ultimately the inability of ＂neo-utilitarian＂ theories to explain systemic transformations. One solution to these drawbacks is to develop an image of the state as a pluralistic aggregate of individuals. Towards this endeavor, I employ Max Weber's ＂methodological individualism,＂ along with his corresponding interpretivist ＂social action approach.＂ However, to be amenable to the concerns of IR, Weber's approach needs to be modified to include certain external constraints on state behavior. This modification leads me to consider six motivations behind social action: Desires, Unexamined actions, Beliefs, Limitations, Interests, and Coercion (DUBLIC). For analysis of international behavior, these individual motivations need to be theoretically connected to the state. To accomplish this, guided by Weber's classification of ＂class, status, and party,＂ I outline what I see as the essential ＂components＂ of the nation-namely; an economic, socio-cultural, and political elite; as well as an ＂enfranchised＂ and a ＂disenfranchised＂ populace. Here, I also rely upon Weber's concept of the ＂ideal-type＂ to flesh-out several contemporary ＂multi-scaler institutions＂ which appear to have causal influence upon international behavior. These institutions include economic institutions-free market vs. protectionist; sociocultural institutions-cosmopolitan vs. communitarian; and two sets of political institutions-democratic vs. authoritarian, and solidarist vs. pluralist. Finally, I use the revised ＂social action approach＂ to analyze the ＂national components＂ and some of the ways they potentially interact with the designated ＂multi-scaler institutions.＂ Overall, the image of the state developed here is that of an individually-mediated ＂fallible nation,＂ rather than a unitary ＂rational actor.＂ It is my hope that this image can contribute necessary complexity to an IR understanding of the state as the fundamental international actor, without sacrificing too much parsimony.

關鍵字

Weber ； methodological ； individualism ； interpretivist ； fallible ； rational

參考文獻

Almeida, Joao M. “Headley Bull’s, ‘Embedded Cosmopolitanism,’ and the Pluralist-Solidarist Debate.” in The Anarchic Society in a Globalized World, edited by Richard Little and John Williams. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.

Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflection on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London and New York: Verso, 1983.

Ashley, Richard. “The Poverty of Neorealism.” in Neorealism and its Critics, edited by Robert Keohane. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.

Beardsworth, Richard. Cosmopolitanism and International Relations Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011.

Bull, Hedley. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan, 1977.