透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.131.168
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

矛盾:基層教師生活世界的宰制與抗拒

Contradictions: Domination and Resistance in Teachers' Everyday Lives

摘要


雖然在教育改革的風潮下,各式各樣的教育政策試圖解決相關問題,但教師的生活世界仍然充斥著去技術化的事實,不僅是在微觀的生活世界層次,也包含巨觀的政策制定層次。本文根據批判教育學的觀點討論教育改革運動背後的文化政治意涵,特別關於教育的主體性-教師,即真正關切這些教師日常生活的抗拒行動,這必須回到教師所處的文化情境脈絡下加以考察。固然Giroux指出抗拒的可能性,然而這種說法就像Apple所批評這些論述缺乏物質性的基礎,只停留在後現代/後結構的論述風格,因此本文引用James Scott的說法能夠補足批判教育學抗拒論述缺乏物質實體的不足,即教師的抗拒必需從隱藏的檔案裡探究,才能看出以虛諉化的手法,表面上不與宰制結構起衝突,但是私底下巧妙地改變整個霸權體質的可能性。最後,本文認為教育改革的本身就是一種矛盾,儘管教育改革的本意試圖解決去霸權化,但教育改革的結果往往又再次霸權化,但教育改革的正面意義在於建立一個討價還價(bargaining)的空間,而衝突或抗拒的產生則是規範性結構動搖的機會。

並列摘要


This paper aims to analyze the educational reform movement in Taiwan from a perspective of critical pedagogy, particularly focusing on teacher's everyday life. Given that teacher's work life is filled up with the fact of deskilling, this study attempts to deconstruct the cultural and political implications underneath the educational reform movement and explore the possibility of resistance from teachers in everyday life. First of all, this paper does not support the claim that teacher union will bring about teachers' professional identity and development. Rather, this paper suggests that only through hidden inquiry about teachers' work life alongside the consideration of strategy/tactic, there may emerge a possibility of resistance. Further, this study goes beyond Henry Giroux's notion of resistance, which is absent from the consideration of material condition, and refers to James Scott's concepts of hidden transcript and euphemism with a view to altering the hegemonic structure from the forces of teachers in everyday life. In conclusion, this paper regards that the implication of the educational reform movement is contradiction; that is, on the one hand, the emergence of educational reform represents a de-hegemonization. The agent of educational reform challenges and shifts a hegemonic structure. But, on the other hand, the results of educational reform also facilitate re-hegemonization, in which educational reform seems inevitably to move towards institutional power; and it is impossible to end the role of the enforced hegemonic structure.

參考文獻


Apple, M.W.(1982).Education and power.London:RKP.
Apple, M.W.(1986).Teachers and texts-Apolitical economy of class and gender relations in education.London:RKP.
Apple, M.W.(1996).Cultural politics and education.New York:Teachers College Press.
Apple, M.W.(2001).Educating the "right" way: Markets, standards, god, and inequality.New York:Routledge Falmer.
Apple, M.W.(ed.)(1982).Cultural and economic reproduction in education: Essays on class, ideology and the state.London:RKP.

被引用紀錄


簡驪潔(2006)。國中教師工作壓力、壓力因應方式及工作倦怠之研究~ 以三鶯地區教師為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0712200716110274
鄭景澤(2006)。一路走來,何必如一—教師異化之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0712200716131303
黃綉萍(2009)。教師自由與學校民主:論楊格夫人之教師角色觀及其實踐經驗〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315162078
石麗秀(2009)。變與不變之間--教師角色認同之敘事探究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315163171
洪慈蔚(2013)。走在增權賦能的道路上-高中團隊教師增權賦能之個案研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0801201418034585

延伸閱讀