透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.22.181.209
  • 期刊

漢儒考辨《周禮》之濫觴-鄭玄《答臨孝存周禮難》及其問答重建

The first discussion of ZhouLi in East Han Dynasty: Questions and Answers between Lin Hsiao Tsun and Zheng Xuan

摘要


《周禮》自問世以來即爭議不斷,論者或視為周初經世大典,或說是王莽、劉歆竄亂聖經所造之偽書,評價毀譽參半。因《周禮》內容涉及古代典章制度的問題甚多,遂成為歷來今、古文家爭論之焦點。過去,由於傳世文獻殘闕不足,坊間幾部常見的經學史論著,當述及漢儒臨孝存和鄭玄首次往復論難《周禮》的這段史實時,多半輕描淡寫,未得深入考究。本文試從清儒纂輯鄭玄《答臨孝存周禮難》所得殘存佚文入手,分析鄭玄與時人辯難《周禮》之言論,歸納出臨氏對《周禮》經文於職官身份、名義稱謂、禮文詮釋、授田分配等內容的疑惑,並探討雙方進行經義疏解各自的問答意識,及運用的考證方法與侷限。藉此瞭解該次問答在《周禮》學史上占有的先驅意義,還臨氏於學術史上一應有之地位。

並列摘要


There has so many argument about the truth or fake of the book ZhouLi in Zhouli studies' history. For the book ZhouLi concerns many problems about the laws and institutions of the old society, it become a great focus of argument between ancient written researchers and modern written researchers from ancient times till today. In the past, according to the incomplete and missing pages of olden books, many normal historical researchers of the classics describe just plainly about the topics of the first discussion for the book Zhouli between Lin Hsiao Tsun and Zheng Xuan. This study try to analyze the material of argument between Zheng Xuan and others researchers through the book "Answer Lin's Asking about ZhouLi", and then conclude the understanding of Lin to the contents of the ZhouLi. Our purpose is to rebuild the questions and answers of Lin and Zheng for the discussing about the explanation of ZhouLi, and stand out the real value of Lin's research.

參考文獻


清‧袁鈞輯,皮錫瑞疏證,《鄭志疏證》,臺北:世界書局,1963。Yuan,J.( Ed.), & Pi S.-R.(1963).Zheng zhi shu card [Annotations of Zheng zhi ]. Taipei: World.
清‧孫詒讓撰,王文錦等人點校,《周禮正義》,北京:中華書局,2000。Sun, Y.(2000). Zhou li cheng yi [Annotations of Zhou Li]. Beijing: China.
清‧丁福保,《說文解字詁林正補合編》,臺北:鼎文書局,1983。
王利器,《鄭康成年譜》,濟南:齊魯書社,1983。Wang L.-C.(1983). Zheng Kangcheng Chronicles. Jinan: Qilu book club.
徐復觀,《周官成立之時代及其思想性格》,臺北:臺灣學生書局,1980。Hsu,F.-K. (1980).The Age of Zhou Guan and Its Ideological Character. Taipei: Taiwan Student Bookstore.

延伸閱讀