透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.119.133.228
  • 期刊

教練家長式領導八種類型與信任教練、團隊價值觀的關係

Relationships between eight types of coaches' paternalistic leadership and athletes' trust in coach and team values

摘要


目的:以領導類型為研究途徑,探討家長式領導的八種類型的分布情形,以及家長式領導八種領導類型與運動員知覺信任教練、團隊價值觀的關係。方法:以大專排球聯賽公開組609 筆資料為樣本,在五點量尺的家長式領導,以3 為切割點區分出家長式領導的八種領導類型:全面型、恩德型、威德型、恩威型、仁慈型、德範型、威嚇型、全無型。結果:共變數分析顯示,恩德型及全面型是最具有效能的教練類型,威嚇型與全無型是最不具領導效能的類型。結論:根據上述研究發現,教練領導行為應是考量情境和團隊成員因素而加以應變,同時展現對團隊成員的關懷,才能得到成員的信任,提升團隊價值觀。

並列摘要


Purpose: This study was to use leader exemplar approach to analyze the distributions of eight types of paternalistic leadership (PL) in sports, and examine the relationship between the eight types of PL and trust in coach and team values. Method: Samples were 609 open group volleyball players in year 2003 and 2011. Since the measurement for PL was five-point Likert scale, we used the mid-point of the absolute scale (3.0) as the cutoff to determine whether a leader as high and low on PL. Eight types of paternalistic leader as follows: authentic PL leaders, selfless benefactor PL leaders, disciplinarian PL leaders, godfather PL leaders, indulgent PL leaders, ideological PL leaders, dictatorial PL leaders, and Laissez-fire PL leaders. Results: The results revealed indulgent PL and authentic leaders PL leaders where the most often seen leaders in coaching. The top five frequency ranks in leaders’ types were: indulgent PL leaders, authentic leaders PL leaders, ideological PL leaders, Laissez-fire PL leaders, and disciplinarian PL leaders. Except Laissez-fire leaders, the rest were moral-based leaders. The ANCOVA revealed that indulgent PL leaders, authentic leaders PL leaders, and disciplinarian PL leaders were the effectiveness styles, whereas dictatorial PL and Laissez-fire PL leaders were the less effectiveness styles. Conclusion: The findings and applications were discussed.

參考文獻


高三福、張俊一(2015)。家長式領導在運動團隊的研究:期刊論文的回顧與分析。臺灣運動心理學報。15,75-106。
高三福、陳鈺芳(2006)。運動教練的教誨領導:高中運動團隊的個案研究。大專體育學刊。8,97-111。
高三福(2005)。華人運動團隊信任:教練與運動員互動之探究。大專體育學刊。7,115-126。
吳宗祐(2008)。主管威權領導與部屬的工作滿意度與組織承諾:信任的中介歷程與情緒智力的調節效果。本土心理學研究。30,3-63。
鄭伯壎、周麗芳、樊景立(2000)。家長式領導:三元模式的建構與測量。本土心理學研究。14,3-64。

被引用紀錄


聶喬齡、徐碧昭、李炳昭(2023)。以集群分析方式檢驗華人家長式領導在運動員基本心理需求與動機和動機相關變項間差異情形體育學報56(1),125-142。https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.202303_56(1).0008
高三福、潘緯澄、李伯倫、葛記豪、Robert J. Schinke、陳忠強(2021)。反思運動教練體罰為介入策略的教學實踐研究:檢視華人領導與動機氣候的改變體育學報54(3),225-242。https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.202109_54(3).0003
高三福、連玉輝、鄭昱宏、鄭伯壎(2020)。轉型領導與家長式領導在運動領導研究的回顧與展望中華心理學刊62(2),267-298。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.202006_62(2).0008

延伸閱讀