New Directions for Quality Assurance: Transparent Outcomes for Industry Collaboration, Research Training and Student Success

Paula Kelly ； Mollie Dollinger ； Hamish Coates

《Higher Education Evaluation and Development》 10卷1期 (2016/06) Pp. 31-51

https://doi.org/10.6197/HEED.2016.1001.02

並列摘要

Prevailing approaches to quality assurance which were developed decades ago are no longer sufficiently fit for purpose. Quality architectures are not yielding evidence that key stakeholders like students and industry need, and they are not spanning let alone spurring innovative improvements in practice. This paper signals the need to shift beyond constrained approaches to assuring quality and instead embrace transparency as a lens for understanding and creating higher education. This perspective is exemplified by considering three hitherto underemphasised facets of the broader quality agenda -- university/industry collaboration, research training outcomes, and student success. The paper concludes by summarising the directions outlined and charting steps ahead for quality work in Asia.

並列關鍵字

Quality and Transparency ； University/Industry Collaboration ； Research Training ； Student Experience ； Student Success

參考文獻

(2010).International Encyclopedia of Education.Oxford, UK:Elsevier.

E3M. (2015). European indicators and ranking methodology for university third mission. Retrieved June 20, 2015, from www.e3mproject.eu

Agrawal, A.(2001).Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources.World Development.29(10),1649-1672.

Allen Consulting Group(2010).Employer demand for researchers in Australia.Canberra, Australia:Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research.

Altbach, P. G.,Umakoshi, T.(2004).Asian universities: Historical perspectives and contemporary challenges.Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.