- 期刊
Stated Fairness and (Non-)Reciprocating Behaviour in the Ultimatum Game
並列摘要
We have performed a classical ultimatum game experiment in an open, non-anonymous setting among Thai students including a survey of the participants' value, risk-taking behavior and decision motives. The major findings are: (1) Stated minimum oIers the responder is willing to accept are very well in accordance with the predictions of the theory of reciprocity by Falk and Fischbacher [10]. (2) Acceptance rates in the real game showed a large discrepancy with the former indicating an almost non-reciprocating behavior for small oIers. (3) These acceptance rates can't be explained by any of the characteristics from the survey. (4) Stated fairness is a good explanatory variable for the acceptance rates. The findings suggest that reciprocation, although clearly reproducible, is not as stable and basic an underlying reason for behavior than fairness.
延伸閱讀
- ZHANG, T. (2018). Fairness Guaranteed Rating Decomposition in Service-oriented Reputation Systems. Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 34(4), 1079-1094. https://doi.org/10.6688/JISE.201807_34(4).0017
- Sasaki, Y. (2014). Subjective Rationalizability in Hypergames. Advances in Decision Sciences, (2014), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/263615
- 連俊瑋、許和莉、許惠媚（2018）。The Effect of Serious Game Platform and Learning Style Fit on Learning Effectiveness。電子商務學報，20(2)，217-248。https://doi.org/10.6188/JEB.201812_20(2).0004
- 黃俊諭 (2009). A Study on Fair Game Problem [master's thesis, National Tsing Hua University]. Airiti Library. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0016-1111200916122899
- 黃國昌（2008）。Preclusion Effect of Untimely-Raised Issues: In Pursuit of Fairness or Efficiency?。臺大法學論叢，37(2)，189-232。https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.2008.37.02.05