透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.141.6
  • 期刊

印尼語TEAL創意互動教學測驗與評量

Large Class Assessment of Indonesian Language Proficiency

摘要


臺灣現有的印尼語外語教學仍處於起步階段,為配合認識東南亞國家文化及語言,有必要檢視印尼語教學策略,創新教學方法,以提高學習成效。本研究目的在於以教學實踐理念,尋求改善「初級印尼語」大班通識課程原有的線上測驗與口語評量機制,以期滿足多元背景學習者的評量需求。透過行動研究與個案分析,尋求改善以科技增進主動學習(Technology Enhanced Active Learning)的外語評量模式。教學研究結果奠定了下列三項大班外語教學的評量機制。第一、線上測驗題庫的建立:利用Kahoot系統所蒐集的學生答題結果可作為項目難易度和鑑別度分析的資料。如此一來,成就測驗之題目來源和範圍雖仍固定來自同一本教科書,但題目組合卻能依照學生程度彈性調整,增加筆試的效度。第二、口試對話:學生二人一組搭檔對話之音檔,由助教按照評分機制輪流給不同學生評分,並上傳至教學平台。此機制除了降低評分者來自學生的人情壓力,也提供授課老師、助教和學生三角驗證口試結果的機會,增加口試的信度。第三、滿足多元背景學習者的評量需求,驗證不同背景學生仍應使用同樣的戲劇表演方式作為溝通式教學的評量機制,且應開放學生自組演戲團隊,善用新住民和華裔學生帶給本地學生多元豐富的語言與文化資源。

並列摘要


In response to Taiwan government's New Southbound Policy, there has been an interest in studying Southeast Asian languages and cultures, including Indonesian. However, Indonesian L2 education in Taiwan is still in its infancy. There is a need to evaluate the current curriculum design and teaching methods to enhance innovative language teaching and learning. This study aims to improve the large class assessment of Beginning Indonesian, offered by the General Education Center at a national university in Taiwan. Using the data collected from in-class formative assessment in language comprehension and production, student feedback, distribution of facilitative and discriminatory indices of test items, and videos of student role-plays, the researcher examined how to improve the validity and reliability of the written and oral assessment methods and to meet the needs of the students from various backgrounds in an Indonesian as a second language course held in a TEAL (Technology Enabled Active Learning) classroom. The results of this action research demonstrate how to create an inventory of valid and reliable online multiple choice question items by using Kahoot to collect learners' self-assessment data and how to increase the interrater reliability in oral exams by rotating the graders and uploading sound files for accountability. Finally, by comparing three case studies, our findings show how learners from different backgrounds could benefit from the class design and multiple ways of assessment.

參考文獻


Goldman, L.. “Education as politics: university adult education in England since 1870.” Oxford Review of Education 23.1-2 (1999): 89-101.
Bates, T.. “New challenges for universities: why they must change.” Changing Cultures in Higher Education: Moving Ahead of Future Learning. Eds. U. Ehlers and D. Schneckenberg. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2010. 15-25.
蔡元培:〈論大學應設各科研究所之理由〉,《東方雜誌》,第32卷,第1期,1935.1,頁13-14。
Nussbaum, M. C.:《培育人文──人文教育改革的古典辯護》,孫善豪譯,臺北:政大出版社,2010。
陳原:《語言與社會生活:社會語言學》,臺北:臺灣商務印書館,2001。

被引用紀錄


何德華、張惠環、許婉儀(2023)。對話者之語言能力與評分嚴苛度對印尼語口語評量成績之影響教育心理學報55(1),25-46。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202309_55(1).0002

延伸閱讀