二重疏洪道工程環境的的政治生態學分析（一）－劃界（1960－1996）

政治生態學強調在地景生產中，社會和自然的不可分性，同時也強調尺度之間的關係，有助於概念化二重疏洪道地區的地景變遷歷程。本研究主要透過政治生態學的分析視角，梳理政策、地景變遷、居民環境認同及行動之間的關係脈絡，並運用解釋鏈模式，以釐清尺度互動過程。藉此，分析二重疏洪道地區的邊緣化歷程，以及經歷邊緣化後的再發展脈絡，並探討在此變遷歷程中所衍生的環境議題；同時，析論二重疏洪道的界線意涵，以及人與自然關係之演進。回溯二重疏洪道地區的地景變遷歷程，在興建時期，政府決策是以「防洪」為主要論述，然而，實際上卻隱含著「核心」與「邊陲」的認定，同時，在國家政策主導的過程當中，進一步導致二重疏洪道地區的環境退化與邊緣化。

關鍵字

二重疏洪道；政治生態學；環境認同

並列摘要

Political ecology emphasizes the inseparability of society and nature in the production of landscapes, but also highlights the interaction between different scales. It is helpful for us to conceptualize the transformation of Erchong Floodway area. The study analyzes the relationship among politics, transformations of landscapes, and environmental identities and residents' actions through the perspective of of political ecology. Furthermore, the study clarifies the interactive process of scales by the ＂chain of explanation.＂ In this way, the study depicts the historical process of marginalization and the context of redevelopment of Erchong Floodway area, and then analyzes the possibilities and discusses the environmental issues that occurred in the historical transformations. On the other hand, this paper also seeks to define the spatial meaning of the boundary line delimited by Erchong Floodway, and to explore the relationship between human and nature. Trace back to the historical transformation of Erchong Floodway area, during the period of construction, the policies of the state authorities were led by the discourse of ＂flood control,＂ however, it actually implied the identity of ＂the center＂ and ＂the margin.＂ Meanwhile, this area has been led to environmental degradation and marginalization as a result of efforts by state policies.

並列關鍵字

Erchong Floodway ； political ecology ； environmental identities

國際替代計量

二重疏洪道工程環境的的政治生態學分析（一）－劃界（1960－1996）

全文下載

主題瀏覽