透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.17.174.239

摘要


We investigate how board structure affects the choice of ADR for Taiwan and Hong Kong listed firms during 1992 to 2009. We find that board structure does play a role in the choice of ADR. Taiwan listed firms with CEO duality tend to choose to cross list in the US while for Hong Kong listed firms, higher ratio of independent directors will significantly increase the probability to cross list in the US. Moreover, we interestedly find that reallocation among three choices (Level I, Level III, and Rule 144A) of ADR occurs after SOX; and this choice reallocation is significantly influenced by the independent directors. After SOX, Rule 144A is preferred to Level I. Besides, the higher ratio of independent directors would increase the probability to choose Level I more than to choose Rule 144A and Level III when cross-listing.

參考文獻


Cantale, S. (1996). The choice of a foreign market as a signal. Working paper, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA.
Fuerst, O. (1998). A theoretical analysis of the investor protection regulations argument for global listing of stocks. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=139599
Moel, A. (1999). The role of information disclosure on stock market listing decisions: The case of foreign firms listing in the US. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.
Ayyagari, M.,Doidge, C.(2010).Does cross-listing facilitate changes in corporate ownership and control?.Journal of Banking & Finance.34,208-223.
Baker, H. K.,Nofsinger, J. R.,Weaver, D. G.(2002).International cross-listing and visibility.Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis.37,495-521.

延伸閱讀