自律與本真的倫理學比較

Comparing Autonomy with Authenticity in Ethics

徐永康(Yung-Kang Hsu)

《通識教育與多元文化學報》 5期 (2015/07) Pp. 45-62

摘要

本真與自主，對於建構出自我的理想福祉是有差異的，以康德的自主性來說，規範的應然性原則，是由善的道德意志所構成，相反的，以盧梭本真性為本的道德觀，卻是要我們小心，不要去接受某種行為判準的普遍原則。從自我本真性的詮釋來看，行為主體可能具有自主性而無自我本真性，換句話說，行為主體有自主行事能力，但是缺乏自我理解的成分，因此本真性的概念可以修正與補充以自主為基礎的倫理學。

關鍵字

本真性 ； 自主性 ； 盧梭 ； 康德 ； 倫理學

並列摘要

There are difference to construct the individual well-being between autonomy and authenticity. Autonomy, from Kant’s point of view, its normativity is based on the universal principle of good will. On the contrary, the ethics which base on the Rousseau’s authenticity disagree with any universal and objective moral principle. Therefor the meanings of autonomy and authenticity are not the same. The authenticity ethics tries to fix the problems by Kant’s autonomy. The problems are some moral agents have individual autonomy without authenticity. In other words, agents follow self-imposed principle to do something but they do not truly understand the meaning of these thing. Therefor we should change the meaning of Kant’s autonomy and adding the authenticity to fulfill our moral life.

並列關鍵字

autonomy ； authenticity ； ethics ； Kant ； Rousseau