透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.219.22.169
  • 學位論文

運用雙層規劃求解異質工業用戶在需量反應賽局中之差異電價擬定

Using bi-level optimization to solve discriminative electricity pricing problem with industrial users in a demand response game

指導教授 : 邱銘傳
本文將於2024/07/23開放下載。若您希望在開放下載時收到通知,可將文章加入收藏

摘要


緊急電力短缺和停電會造成巨大的經濟損失。近年來,在用電尖峰時段控制和規範電力供給的政策備受關注。在備轉容量低於標準時的特殊情況下,電價擬定是推動需量反應最熱門的機制,例如:用電戶自發性地減少電力使用,以減輕尖峰用電時段的電力負荷。目前雖已有時間電價及需量競價等機制可進行尖峰用電量調節,但仍缺少一個響應機制,以捕捉用電戶對於緊急電價之合理反應,並能針對不同工業用戶,判斷不同激勵條件下,用電量將如何減少。本研究針對電力供應商和工業用戶提出一個賽局理論模型,用於在用電高峰時段,電力供應商提供緊急型需量反應(Emergency Demand Response Program, EDRP)相關的適當獎勵,與工業用戶協商用電減少量。本研究探討電力供給者可以在不增設發電廠的情況下緩解電力短缺問題,工業用戶也可以從減少用電所得到的補償中獲得利潤,達到電力供給者與用戶雙方利益均衡,並在模型中將價格彈性納入考量。在案例分析中以台灣為例,模擬了台灣電力公司(TPC)和願意配合實施EDRP的異質工業用戶之間的賽局,並將四種不同產業性質的工業用戶作為探討對象,得出TPC適合實施需量反應之對象為間斷型且低附加價值產業,根據結果展示本研究提出的模型之優勢。本研究所提之模型可以透過電價擬定和預期用電量幫助電力供應商和工業用戶做出用電決策,實現雙贏局面。最終,電力供應商可以以最省錢的方式從工業用戶獲得足夠電力,同時工業用戶也可以獲得更多利潤。

並列摘要


Emergent power shortage and power outage cause enormous economic losses. Policies to control and regularize power supply in peak hours independent of the normal situation has drawn attention in recent years. A special power pricing at the time when the Operating Reserve is below standard is among the most popular mechanisms to drive Demand Response, i.e., a spontaneous power usage deduction from the user side, to alleviate peak loads. Known pricing mechanisms including time pricing and bidding mechanism have been employed in the market, but a mechanism capturing the rational response of the user side to the emergent power prices along with discriminative pricing capturing different industrial users’ incentive to deduct power usage remains absent. This study presents a game-theoretic model for power provider and industrial customers to negotiate power usage deduction during the peak hours with proper rebate associated with the Emergency Demand Response Program (EDRP). This study discusses that power provider can reduce power shortage without opening additional power plants and the industrial consumers can also be benefited with compensation from power provider, achieving a balance of profits between power provider and industrial users. Meanwhile, the price elasticity of electricity is considered into the model. A case study of power market in Taiwan is discussed to simulate the game between TPC and heterogeneous aggregate industrial customers who are willing to cooperate with the implementation of EDRP. Four aggregate industrial users with different industrial properties are taken as the object of case study. It is concluded that the target suitable for TPC to implement EDRP is discrete and low value-added manufacturing class. The proposed model can help both power provider and users to make decisions with the price setting and power usage to achieve a win-win situation. Power provider could retain electricity from users and maintain stable power supply while users could earn price compensation.

參考文獻


1. Aalami, H.A., Pashaei-Didani, H., Nojavan, S., 2019. Deriving nonlinear models for incentive-based demand response programs. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 106 223-231.
2. Aalami, H., Yousefi, G.R., Parsa Moghadam, M., 2008. Demand Response Model Considering EDRP and TOU Programs. Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition, on April 21-24, Chicago, IL, USA.
3. Aalami, H.A., Moghaddam M.P., Yousefi G.R., 2010. Modeling and prioritizing demand response programs in power markets. Electric Power Systems Research, Volume 80, Pages 426–435.
4. Aalami, H.A., Parsa Moghadam, M., Yousefi, G.R., 2010. Demand response modeling considering Interruptible/Curtailable loads and capacity market programs. Applied Energy, Volume 87, Pages 243-250.
5. Aazami, R., Aflaki, K., Haghifam, M.R., 2011. A demand response based solution for LMP management in power markets. Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages 1125-1132.

延伸閱讀