透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.93.73

並列摘要


We find that mandatory pension contributions, and more generally a reduction of internally-generated cash flows, reduce firm risk. We interpret this evidence as being due to managers forgoing riskier investments. Consistent with this interpretation, we find that the effect of mandatory pension contributions on firm risk is stronger among firms that are more likely to overinvest. The results are robust across alternative mandatory contribution measures. Our findings support the overinvestment of free cash flow and enhance our understanding of how pension funding rules affect firm risk and investment policies. Regulatory implications are drawn.

參考文獻


Cheng, Q., & Michalski, L. (2010). Contributions to defined benefit pension plans: Economic and account determinants? Working Paper, Singapore Management University, Singapore.
Amir, E.,Benartzi, S.(1998).The expected rate of return on pension funds and asset allocation as predictors of portfolio performance.The Accounting Review.73,335-352.
Amir, E.,Gordon, E. A.(1996).Firms' choice of estimation parameters: Empirical evidence from SFAS No. 106.Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance.11,427-448.
Bebchuk, L. A.,Cohen, A.(2005).The costs of entrenched boards.Journal of Financial Economics.78,409-433.
Bergstraesser, D.,Desai, M.,Rauh, J.(2006).Earnings manipulation, pension assumptions and managerial investment decisions.Quarterly Journal of Economics.121,157-195.

延伸閱讀