- 期刊
Perioperative Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Cages for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disorders
並列摘要
Objectives: Surgical fusion of the lumbar spine is an important method for the permanent stabilization after decompression surgery. Various clinical modalities of spinal fusion have been reported. Both transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) and posterior interbody fusion (PLIF) provide a circumferential fusion and are considered reasonable surgical options. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively assess clinical parameters such as surgical blood loss, duration of the procedure and hospitalization and complications for TLIF and PLIF for lumbar fusion. Methods: Fifty-two patients with degenerative lumbar disorders treated with posterior decompression, posterior pedicle screws instrumentation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with cages for one-or two-level degenerative lumbar disorders were analyzed retrospectively. Perioperative data including patient's basic data, operation time, blood loss, hospitalization days and complications were compared between these two groups. Results: The mean operation time and blood loss of the TLIF group were less than those of the PLIF group. The difference in the average length of hospitalization was not statistically significant. No major complication was observed during the operations or at follow-up in both groups. There were two patients with transient neurologic deficit in the TLIF group and one patient in the PLIF group. Conclusions: Considering diminished blood loss, shortened operation time and relatively safely procedure, TLIF is considered as a more advantageous method than PLIF when been used for fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disorders.
延伸閱讀
- Oktenoglu, T., Ozer, A. F., Sasani, M., Ataker, Y., Gomleksiz, C., & Celebi, I. (2013). Posterior Transpedicular Dynamic Stabilization versus Total Disc Replacement in the Treatment of Lumbar Painful Degenerative Disc Disease: A Comparison of Clinical Results. Advances in Orthopedics, 2013(), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/874090
- 陳元森（2022）。Assessing the Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylosis in Geriatric Population〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU202203561
- Chen, H. C., Lee, C. H., Wei, L., Lui, T. N., & Lin, T. J. (2015). Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Open Lumbar Surgery for Adjacent Segment Degeneration and Recurrent Disc Herniation. Neurology Research International, 2015(), 184-188. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/791943
- Lin, J. F., Tsai, C. C., Huang, Y. C., Yang, C. C., & Chen, Y. J. (2023). Anterior to Psoas Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Fusion with Cortical Bone Trajectory Fixation for Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease. International Journal of Gerontology, 17(2), 130-134. https://doi.org/10.6890/IJGE.202304_17(2).0010
- Habib, A., Smith, Z. A., Lawton, C. D., & Fessler, R. G. (2012). Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Perspective on Current Evidence and Clinical Knowledge. Minimally Invasive Surgery, 2012(), 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/657342