韓儒李退溪與奇高峰「四端七情」之論辯

The Debate between Korean Confucians Yi T'oegye and Ki Kobong on the "Four Clues and Seven Emotions"

楊祖漢(Cho-Hon Yang)

《華岡文科學報》 26期 (2003/09) Pp. 45-116

https://doi.org/10.6361/HKJH.200309.0045

摘要

宋代理學，尤其是朱子學，在韓國的朝鮮朝（李朝）時有盛大的流行。而朱子學的某些見解、理論在朝鮮儒學中有甚為深刻的討論，使朱子學在韓國有異於在中國之發展。本文要處理的四端七情之辯，便是其中最重要的論題。本文對引起此一論爭的李退溪及奇高峰有關這問題的往來書信，摘其重要者作詳細的疏釋，希望能確定地了解兩人論爭之理論問題所在。本文又藉著當代有關朱子思想的研究成果，以對照出四、七之辯的問題意義。

關鍵字

四七之辯 ； 韓國儒學 ； 朱子

並列摘要

Neo-Confucianism in the Sung Dynasty, particularly Chu Hsi's doctrine, enjoyed its great popularity in the Chosan Dynasty in Korea. Some of Chu His's opinions and theories have deeply discussed in Korean Confucianism, and make his doctrine different from what is in China. The debate on the ”Four Clues and Seven Emotions” touched on here is regarded as its most important topic. In this article, important points taken from the letters written by Yi T'oegue and Ki Kobong talking about such a debate are fully explained. It is hoped that the explanation will have a definite understanding of where the theory is about their debate. This article is also intended to contrast the meaning of the four-seven debate with contemporary research achievements in Chu-Hsi thought.

並列關鍵字

Four-Seven debate ； Korean Confucianism ； Chu Hsi