透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.140.185.147
  • 期刊

春秋戰國時代的系統戰爭:三種現實主義外交政策理論的比較

Systemic Wars in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period: A Comparison Between the Three Realism Foreign Policy Theories

摘要


中國的快速崛起是否將對東亞區域安全以及中美關係帶來負面的影響,是當代國際關係研究中最重要的問題之一。當代的三大現實主義外交政策理論—攻勢現實主義、新古典現實主義和守勢現實主義,普遍對於中國的崛起是否會帶來衝突的發生抱持著較為悲觀的看法,但是對於這個衝突到底是如何產生的因果機制,卻有著不同的預測。本文考察在歷史上極為接近現實主義「無政府狀態」假定的東周時代所發生的兩場大戰—春秋末年的「齊吳之戰」與戰國末年的「秦滅六國之戰」,並且發現,在一個非常接近現實主義「無政府狀態」假定的環境之下,各國的「擴張理由」和「聯盟政策」,最符合「新古典現實主義」的預測。本文的發現對於以現實主義的外交政策理論來理解中國崛起對國際衝突的影響具有重要的啟示意義。

並列摘要


How the rise of China may affect regional security in East Asia and the Sino-U.S. relationship is one of the most important questions in contemporary international relations studies. All the three main contemporary realism foreign policy theories-offensive realism, neoclassical realism, and defensive realism-hold pessimistic attitudes towards the impact of China's rise, but differ in the mechanisms they infer to explain how China's rise will lead to international conflict. In this article, I investigate two systemic wars that occurred in the Spring and Autumn Period (the war between Qi and Wu) and the Warring States Period (the war between Qin and the other six warring states) with historical backgrounds that are similar to the realism's "anarchy" assumption when compared with all the other historical periods in China. I find that it is neoclassical realism, not offensive realism or defensive realism, which has the most explanatory power in a world of ideal-type anarchy. This finding has important theoretical implications when we try to predict the influence of China's rise on international conflict with the applications of realism theories.

參考文獻


楊仕樂,2017,〈儒家文化、軟權力與霸權抉擇:清初的案例研究 (1676 ~ 1735)〉,《政治學報》,第64期,頁75-103。doi:10.6229/CPSR.2017.64.04
唐欣偉、唐豪駿,2017,〈以西漢前期對胡越之行動檢視攻勢現實主義〉,《政治學報》,第64期,頁23-39。doi:10.6229/CPSR.2017.64.02
張登及、陳瑩羲,2012,〈朝貢體系再現與「天下體系」的興起?中國外交的案例研究與理論反思〉,《中國大陸研究》,第55卷第4期,頁89-123。doi:10.30389/MCS.201212_55(4).0004
Bennett, D. S., 2006. “Toward a Continuous Specification of the Democracy-Autocracy Connection.” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 313-338. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00404.x
Bueno de Mesquita, B., & Smith, A., 2012. “Domestic Explanations of International Relations.” Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 161-181.doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-070209-174835

延伸閱讀