《呂氏春秋》所見《孝經》經句考述－兼論《孝經》的成立問題

The Discussion of Xiao-jing's Sentences Seen in Lushichunqiu-Including the Discussion of Xiaojing's Author

莊兵(Zhuang Bing)

《輔仁國文學報》 44期 (2017/04) Pp. 1-43

摘要

《呂氏春秋‧察微》中可見一段引用《孝經‧諸侯章》語句，〈孝行〉中也有酷似《孝經‧天子章》的語句，自古圍繞《孝經》成立問題的衆多論考，無不以爭論《呂氏春秋》所見此二條《孝經》經句是否屬實，作為研判《孝經》成立於先秦抑或僞作於漢儒之重要論據。今存《呂氏春秋》為後漢高誘注本，筆者發現《呂氏春秋》高誘注引用《孝經》多達十三條並未引起《孝經》研究者的重視，以至對此全無考察。本文以此作為切入點，並針對與《孝經》文本有關聯的《儒家者言》以及以往被認定成僞書而受忽略的《孔子家語》、《孔叢子》等進行綜合考察，從而釐定《呂氏春秋》兩處稱引《孝經》語句是否可以作為《孝經》至遲在戰國末年已經存在的證據？抑或相反？由此針對《孝經》的成立問題做進一步探討。

關鍵字

呂氏春秋 ； 孝經 ； 高誘 ； 儒家者言 ； 孔叢子

並列摘要

There is a quotation from Xzaojing/Zhuhouzhang in Lushichunqiu / Weichapian. A similar sentence like one in Xiaojing/Tianzizhang was seen in Lushichunqiu/Xiaoxingpian, too. To discuss the truth of the two quotations will be an important clue to judge whether Xiaojing was completed in Zhangguo dynasty or Han dynasty. There have been many studies concerning this issue when dealing with Xiaojing's completion. Lushichunqiu' annotation was written by Gaoyou in Houhan dynasty. I found that Gaoyou quoted 13 sentences from Xiaojing but the truth has not been taken seriously. This paper aims to discuss about Rujiazheyan which is concernd with Xiaojing as well as Kongzijiayu and Kongcongzi which have been defined as frauds. This procedure will clarify that whether the two quotations from Xiaojing in Lushichunqiu can be a proof of Xiaojing's existence at the late Zhanguo dynasty or not. The author of Xiaojing will be discussed more as well.

並列關鍵字

Lushichunqiu ； Xiao-jing ； Gaoyou ； Rujiazheyan ； Kongcongzi

參考文獻

呂妙芬(2008)。做為儀式性文本的《孝經》：明清士人《孝經》實踐的個案研究。近代史研究所集刊。60

呂妙芬(2004)。晚明士人論《孝經》與政治教化。臺大文史哲學報。61

(1987)。景印文淵閣四庫全書。上海:上海古籍出版社。

(1980)。十三經注疏。北京:中華書局。

(1980)。十三經注疏。北京:中華書局。