Title

應用Q方法分析年輕消費者之產品設計鑑賞

Translated Titles

Applying Q-methodolody for the Study of Young Consumers' Product Design Appreciation

DOI

10.6381/JD.200409.0071

Authors

吳俊杰(Jun-Chieh Wu);楊永盛(Yeon-Sheng Yang);張庭榕(Ting-Jung Chang)

Key Words

Q方法 ; Q分類 ; Q因素分析 ; 設計鑑賞 ; 年輕消費者 ; Q-methodology ; Q-sort ; Q-factor analysis ; Design appreciation ; Young consumers

PublicationName

設計學報

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

9卷3期(2004 / 09 / 01)

Page #

71 - 83

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

本文主要以年輕消費者作為研究對象,探討年輕消費者的產品設計鑑賞。經彙整Veryzer[16]所歸納的設計特性與Wu[17]所歸納的設計意識,形成本研究的五個產品設計特性:產品操作、產品瞭解、產品組織結構、產品渴望價值與產品風格,作為衡量與評估的依據。 本研究主要採用Q方法,以Q因素分析來探討年輕消費者之產品設計鑑賞類型。結果顯示,年輕消費者之產品設計鑑賞類型可區分為:(1)省時安全便利的產品操作型,(2)產品風格的價值渴望型,(3)產品的品牌與功能瞭解型,及(4)產品品質的保證型等四類。 在設計鑑賞方面:類型一者著重於產品操作;類型二者重視產品造形風格;類型三者則重點放在對產品功能的瞭解;而類型四者對產品的操作、組織結構和風格等特性並重,並著重於產品優良設計品質的實際感受。

English Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the product design appreciation of young consumers. Based upon the design characteristics Veryzer[16] induced and the design consciousness Wu[17] generalized, this research has resulted in the following five characteristics of product design: product operation, product comprehension, product construction, product desired value, and product style. This research mainly used Q-methodology, Q-factor analysis was used to find the contingency and the difference between the types of product design appreciation of young consumers. The result shows that the types of product design appreciation of young consumers could be classified as the following five types: Type 1, safety and convenience product operation; Type 2, desired value of product style; Type 3, product's brand and function comprehension; and Type 4, product quality guarantee. In terms of design appreciation: Type 1 focuses on the product operation; Type 2 values product's form and style; Type 3 attaches importance to their understanding on product functions; and Type 4 pays equal attention to product operation, product construction, and style of product while lay emphasis on actual feeling of the fine quality of product design.

Topic Category 人文學 > 藝術
社會科學 > 傳播學
Reference
  1. Assael, Henry(1998).Consumer Behaviorand Marketing Action.Cincinnati, Ohio:South-Western College Publishing.
  2. Brown, Steven R.(1980).Political Subjectivity: Application of Q Methodology in Political Science.New Haven & London:Yale University Press.
  3. Cuffaro, Daniel F.,Vogel, B.,Matt, B.(2002).Why Good Design Doesn't Always Guarantee Success.Design Management Journal,13(1),49-55.
  4. Lutz, R. J.,Perspectives (eds.),Consumer Behavior, (eds.) Harold H. Kassarjian,Thomas S. Roberson(1991).The Role of Attitude Theory in Marketing.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  5. Norman, Donald A.(1988).The Design of Everyday Things.New York:BasicBooks Inc..
  6. Nussbaum, Bruce(1988).Smart Design.Business Week.
  7. Rutter, Bryce G.,Agne, James A. W.(1998).A Darwinian Theory of Good Design.Design Management Journal,36-41.
  8. Sawhney, Ravi K.(2002)。Psycho-aesthetics(心理美學)馬丁尼。設計雜誌,103,44-46。
  9. Schlinger, M. J.(1969).Cues on Q-Technique.Journal of Advertising Research,9(3),53-60.
  10. Stephenson, William(1953).The Study of Behavior: Q-Technique and Its Methodology.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
  11. Veryzer, Robert W.(1999).Working paper, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy.New York:
  12. Wu, J. C.(1999).Leicester,De Montfort University.
  13. 林建煌(2002)。消費者行?。台北:智勝文化。
  14. 陳文印(1997)。設計解讀-工業設計專業知能知探索。台北:亞太圖書。
  15. 陳振甫(1996)。設計意識對產品定位之影響。工業設計雜誌,25(3),24-29。
  16. 黃俊霖(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄,高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理研究所。
  17. 羅文輝(1986)。Q 方法的理論與應用。民意學術專刊,45-71。
Times Cited
  1. 陳任智(2011)。智慧型手機之產品功能對消費者行為模式之研究。淡江大學管理科學研究所企業經營碩士在職專班學位論文。2011。1-97。 
  2. 趙佩儀(2011)。Q方法研究志為人醫的動機-台大醫學系為例。臺灣大學國家發展研究所學位論文。2011。1-187。
  3. 林晉億(2015)。以Q方法論探討刑事警察人員職業選擇動機-以刑事警察局為例。臺灣大學國家發展研究所學位論文。2015。1-242。