Title

英國電視置入性行銷之管制:論辯與改變

Translated Titles

Debates and Changes on the Regulations of Product Placement in the U.K.

DOI

10.6195/cjcr.2011.20.03

Authors

林麗雲(Li-Hyun Lin)

Key Words

置入性行銷 ; 廣電管制 ; 商業訊息 ; 英國 ; product placement ; television regulations ; commercial messages ; the U.K.

PublicationName

中華傳播學刊

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

20期(2011 / 12 / 01)

Page #

45 - 63

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

長久以來,英國對電視的管制是以公共服務的理念為主,禁止置入性行銷,規定節目與廣告應分離。當英國推動無線數位平台,頻道數目增加後,在商業電視業者的壓力下,英國管制者才開始思考是否放鬆管制。但英國不是採取立即開放,而是歷經公共論辯的過程。過程中由於公民團體要求保護閱聽人權益,英國僅有條件開放,只開放四類節目置入,並要求業者應充分告知閱聽人;而且直接關乎閱聽人權益的節目,絕不可有置入;不當之商品與服務也不可置入。本文即分析此論辯與改變的過程,並指出其對台灣的啟示。

English Abstract

Broadcasting regulation in the U.K. is founded on the ideology of public service; consequently, product placement has long been prohibited. With the introduction of a multi-channel digital platform and under the pressures of commercial broadcasters, British regulators began considering the possibility of lifting the ban. However, the U.K. did not adopt rapid deregulation, but held public debates and consultations. Because citizen groups demanded protection for the interests of the audience, product placement is still prohibited expect in four programme genres: films, series made for television, sports programmes and light entertainment programmes, Product placement must be signalled clearly by means of a universal logo. Programs that are directly related to the interests of the audience are not allowed to have product placements. Furthermore, certain products and public information are disallowed from being placed in programs. This study analyzes the debates and changes in the U.K. and indicates the implications for Taiwan.

Topic Category 社會科學 > 傳播學
Reference
  1. Advertising Association. (2010.09). Broadcasting Code review: Commercial references in television programming: Consultation. A response by the Advertising Association. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/724242/responses/Advertising_Association.pdf
  2. BBC. (2009.09.13). Product placement for TV approved. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8252901.stm
  3. Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom. (2010.09.14). Response by the Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom to the Ofcom consultation Broadcasting Code Review: Commercial references in television. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/724242/responses/CPBF.pdf
  4. Channel 4. (2010.09.22). Channel 4 response to Ofcom consultation on product placement and commercial references in television programming. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/724242/responses/Channel_4.pdf
  5. Channel 5. (2010.09.17). Response of Channel 5 Broadcasting Ltd to Ofcom's proposals on revising the Broadcasting Code. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/724242/responses/Channel_5_Broadcasting_Ltd.pdf
  6. Children's Food Campaign. (2010.09). Ofcom consultation on the Broadcasting Code review: Commercial references in television programming. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/724242/responses/Childrens_Food_Campaign.pdf
  7. COI. (2010.06.28). COI response to Ofcoms Broadcasting Code review: Commercial references in television programming. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/724242/responses/COI.pdf
  8. European Sponsorship Association. (2010.09.17). OFCOM consultation Broadcasting Code review: Commercial references in television programmes. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/724242/responses/ESA.pdf
  9. Hardy, J. (2010.01.11). CPBF submission to DCMS consultation on product placement on television. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://www.cpbf.org.uk/body.php?subject=gov&id=2289&f=1*
  10. Holmwood, L., & Sweney, M. (2008.06.11). ITV: Shares hit by move to oppose product placement. The Guardian. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/jun/11/advertising
  11. Institute of Practitioners in Advertising. (2010.09). Broadcasting Code review: Commercial references in television programming: Consultation. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/724242/responses/ipa.pdf
  12. Ofcom. (2005.09). The future of television funding. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/tvresearch/future/
  13. Ofcom. (2006.03.13). Product placement: A consultation on issues related to product placement. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/product_placement/summary/product.pdf
  14. Ofcom. (2006.10.18). Product placement: Summary of responses to consultation on issues relating to product placement. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/product_placement/statement/statement.pdf
  15. Ofcom. (2010.12). Broadcasting Code review: Commercial references in television programming. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/bcrtv2010/statement/
  16. Ofcom. (2011.02.14). Product placement logo to be shown on TV screens. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://media.ofcom.org.uk/2011/02/14/product-placement-logo-to-be-shown-on-tv-screens/
  17. Ofcom. (2011.02.28). Guidance notes section nine: Commercial references in television programming. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/broadcast/guidance/831193/section9.pdf
  18. S4C. (2010.09.16). S4C's response to Ofcom's consultation entitled “Broadcasting Code review: Commercial references in television programming” (“the Consultation”). Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://stakeholders. ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/724242/responses/S4C.pdf
  19. Viner, B. (2011.03.01). Wake up and smell the coffee -- Product placement is here. The Independent. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/wake-up-and-smell-the-coffee-ndash-product-placement-is-here-2228533.html
  20. Which? (2010.09.17). Response to Broadcasting Code review: Commercial references in television programming. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/724242/responses/Which.pdf
  21. Which? (2011). What is Which? Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://www.which.co.uk/about-which/who-we-are/overview/
  22. 卓沅蓁(2008.01.16)。〈2007 歐盟視聽媒體服務指令III:置入性行銷vs. 隱藏式/潛伏式廣告〉,《NCCWATCH 媒體公民行動網》。上網日期:2011 年10 月10 日,取自http://nccwatch.org.tw/story/20080116/9186
  23. 國家通訊傳播委員會(2009.11.11)。〈NCC 說明衛星廣播電視法修正草案有關「置入性行銷」之規範〉,《NCCWATCH 媒體公民行動網》。上網日期:2011 年10 月10 日,取自http://nccwatch.org.tw/news/20091114/52465
  24. 楊宗興(2011.09.15)。〈NCC暗指置入性行銷 客委會駁:不實指控〉,《新頭殼newtalk》。上網日期:2011 年10 月10 日,取自http://www.newtalk.tw/news_read.php?oid=17851
  25. Broadcasting Code (2009).
  26. Broadcasting Code (2011).
  27. Communication Act (2003).
  28. Bradshaw, T., & Pickard, J. (2009.09.13). Labour set for U-turn on TV product placement. Financial Times. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/117648cc-a060-11de-b9ef-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz1X2zS3ebV
  29. 林上祚(2009.10.22)。〈廣告置入 英國解禁〉,《中國時報》,A4版。
  30. 褚涓汶(2003.12.23)。〈新聞局置入性行銷遭抨擊〉,《銘報》。上網日期:2011 年10 月10 日, 取自http://mol.mcu.edu.tw/data/1072257565.pdf
  31. Department for Culture, Media and Sport.Broadcasting- Copy of Royal Charter for the continuance of the British Broadcasting Corporation.Stationery Office:London.
  32. Freedman, D.(2008).The politics of media policy.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
  33. Livingstone, S.,Lunt, P.,Miller, L.(2007).Citizens and consumers: Discursive debates during and after the Communications Act 2003.Media Culture Society,29,613-638.
  34. 張錦華、林麗雲(2011)。頭痛醫頭:政府宣導只要禁止置入和要求揭露就完備了嗎?─檢視《預算法》第六十二之一條增訂案。台大新聞論壇,10,87-105。
  35. 張錦華、林麗雲、洪貞玲、王泰俐(2011)。,台北市:國家通訊傳播委員會。
Times Cited
  1. 黃淑鈴(2016)。地點置入:地方政府影視觀光政策的分析。新聞學研究,126,1-46。