- 期刊
國民黨立法院黨團的黨鞭制度比較的觀點
Party Whips System of KMT's Caucus in the Legislative Yuan: A Comparative Perspective
並列摘要
Under the operational experience and researches of the British and United States congress, this paper attempts to comparative and explore the party whip system of KMT's caucus in the Legislative Yuan, and it emphasis on its institutional contents and changing process. First, this paper finds that the function of KMT's whip is similar to the British and United States, but the organizational scope is smaller. In early periods, the selection of KMT's whip is dominated by party headquarters, and to elect by ballot later. The career development of KMT's whip is appear ladder-climbing, but most of the members are dabblers and whippers, only a few members are ladder climbers. Second, this paper points out the factors that affects the institution and operation of KMT's whip. One factor is the party attribute, in order to party headquarters control the caucus. The second factor is environment change, that the entirely re-election of the Legislative Yuan in 1992, and the party transition in 2000 to bring the institutional change of KMT's whip.
參考文獻
延伸閱讀
- 王定村（2004）。論國會改革與立法委員專業倫理的建立。思與言：人文與社會科學期刊，42(1)，31-64。https://doi.org/10.6431/TWJHSS.200403.0031
- 鄭明德（2004）。民進黨立法院黨團的黨鞭制度。中華人文社會學報，(1)，38-55。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18142826-200409-x-1-38-55-a
- 莊富源（2003）。憲改以來我國立院黨團制度之初探。白沙人文社會學報，(2)，17-50。https://doi.org/10.6766/JPHSS.200310.0017
- 謝復生（1992）。對總統選舉方式及國民大會問題的幾點看法。律師通訊，(151)，61-66。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000084-199204-x-151-61-66-a
- 彭女玲（1993）。Strengthening the Function of Budgetary Review for the Legislative Yuan。中國行政評論，3(1)，103-130。https://doi.org/10.6635/cpar.1993.3(1).05