透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.209.66.87
  • 期刊

台灣運動教育學領域博碩士論文內容分析、比較與發展趨勢之研究

A Study of Content Analysis, Comparison, and Developmental Tendency on the Master theses and Doctoral dissertations in the Field of Sport Pedagogy, in Taiwan

摘要


本研究針對我國自民國61年至94年(共計34年),所出版之運動教育學博碩士論文,進行論文特性的分析;以瞭解運動教育學博碩士論文數量、主題類目及研究方法、抽樣方法、研究工具、統計方法的特性。本研究共得博碩士論文336冊,以內容分析法進行論文特性分析。再經問卷調查法及深度訪談法分析形成論文特性之原因,為質量並重之研究法。經由統計分析的結果得到以下結論:一、目前國內博碩士論文內容分析與比較:(一)我國運動教育學博碩士論文數量在民國90年以後,呈現明顯的成長,顯示發展情形頗佳。(二)「教學層面」是我國運動教育學博碩士論文研究主題類目中最受到重視,其次為「課程層面」。「教學策略」、「教學評鑑」、「學生特質」則是我國運動教育學博碩士論文主要的研究主題次類目。(三)在使用研究方法之特性中,「問卷調查法」與「實驗研究法」為我國運動教育學博碩士論文常使用的研究方法。常使用的統計方法為「描述統計法」、「t考驗」、「變異數分析」以及「相關」統計,形成研究論文最主要的統計方法;論文中採用的統計方法種類以2種以上佔絕大多數。二、未來的研究發展趨勢:(一)在研究主題部分,「教學層面」與「課程層面」仍是我國運動教育學未來的研究重點。「師資層面」中的「實習輔導」則是另一發展趨勢。(二)主題次類目中,「教學策略」、「教學評鑑」、仍佔最高之比率,近年「學生特質」逐漸受到研究者的重視。(三)在研究方法部分,而質量並重之研究模式有逐漸增多之趨勢;而質性研究,亦是未來使用研究方法之趨勢。(四)研究生選擇論文研究方向最首要之考量為自己的興趣,而指導教授通常能影響研究生在方向上的指導。三、在建議部分:運動教育學的研究領域有逐漸擴大的趨勢,建議增加「邊際層面」之次領域項目(4)運動理念之部分,研究的子題包含奧林匹克與文化,運動倫理與道德、身心障礙教學等部份,充實運動教育學的內容,並提供運動教育學界參考與研究。

並列摘要


This study analyzed characteristic content of master and doctoral theses which published from year 1972 to year 2005 in the field of sport pedagogy in Taiwan. The purpose of this study was to understand the number of sport pedagogy masters and doctoral research, research subjects, research methods, and statistical features. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used. There were 336 master and doctoral theses of sport pedagogy. Content analysis methods were used to study the characteristic content, then questionnaires and interviews to analyze the reasons for characteristic content development. After statistical analyses, the results were as follows: 1. The content analysis and comparison of theses of master and doctoral theses: (1) There was a significant increase in the master and doctoral theses in the field of sport pedagogy after year 2001. This development showed higher quality. (2) The instruction domain and curriculum domain came first and second in main category while instructional strategy, teaching evaluation, and students' characteristics were in the sub-category research subject. (3) Most theses in sport pedagogy used sampling survey method and experimental method. The descriptive statistic, t-test, analysis of variance, and correlation coefficient were used frequently. Most studies on the master and doctoral theses in sport pedagogy used at least two statistical methods. 2. For the future research studies tendency toward sport pedagogy: (1) The instruction domain and curriculum domain will be an emphasis in the field of sport pedagogy for the future. (2) For the future study, the minor of priority research subject in the field of sport pedagogy have higher percentage on the instructional strategy and teaching evaluation. Recently, students' characteristics become more focused. (3) ln the research method, qualitative and quantitative research methods have increased in recent year , and qualitative research method will be the trend in the future studies. (4) Graduate students chose their thesis topics according to their interest, and their academic advisor can influence their research direction. 3. For recommendation on the future study, sport pedagogy research has progressively and gradually expanded which include some sports concept. Olympic cultures, sport ethics, adaptive program, sport safety and first aid could be added into marginal domain of research subject in sport pedagody.

參考文獻


https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22090NCPE5567009%22.&searchmode=basic

被引用紀錄


呂子平、何炘澄、王志全(2020)。臺灣羽球運動學術期刊論文發表之現況分析臺灣體育學術研究(68),1-13。https://doi.org/10.6590%2fTJSSR.202006_(68).01
許喬凱(2014)。應用分析網路程序法建構研發型組織績效評估指標之研究〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613594982

延伸閱讀