Title

美國加利福尼亞州能源安全分析:從巴西的能源政策吸取之教訓

Translated Titles

ENERGY SECURITY ANALYSIS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA:THE LESSONS LEARNED FROM BRAZIL’S ENERGY POLICY

Authors

李查德

Key Words

能源安全 ; 能源政策 ; 加利福尼亞州 ; 巴西 ; Energy security ; energy policy ; california ; brazil

PublicationName

臺灣大學農業經濟學研究所學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2013年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

雷立芬

Content Language

英文

English Abstract

This research was done to study the different aspects of energy security in context of extracting lessons from Brazil’s energy policy, for the state of California. The study had chosen California, because it is the most productive state in the union, in regards to total GDP. It also boasts the most important technological hub in the world, in Palo Alto. It also has a long story of being the most advanced state, in regards to renewable energy. Brazil was chosen, because it has implemented prime examples of country wide development of renewable energy. The ethanol programme for transportation and hydropower for electricity. The methodology used was a qualitative comparison of governmental and international organization’s data, to see the progress of energy diversification. Since the 1970’s oil crisis’s to the present day, and near future. Case study methodologies of observation and comparison of one case to another were used. In order to arrive at some important conclusions regarding the slow change of California. It was found that the rate of organizational change and goal attainment in governmental agencies, is much faster in state capitalist countries like Brazil. California, and all liberal democracies, are slowed down by the network management of private companies. The document will show, the different trends of generation, demand, forecasts, and planned investment of the last decades, and near future. To certify the rate of slow change. At the end, we can see that California, even though has made considerable efforts, still lags, and even has regressed their energy dependence over the last four decades. In addition, it was found that the state has indirectly managed investor owned companies, choose to invest on fossil fuel sourced electric generation, instead of renewable energy. The energy commission does pressure private companies, and have been moderately successful. Establishing the seeds of many interesting projects. They have reached 14% of their electricity demand on renewable sources. But Brazil successfully furnishes the whole country with 78% hydro generated power. They have been done it with state capitalist strategies, and cooperation from the private sector as well. Petroleum will never lower its price, because demand is growing, and supply is non renewable. It is of imperative importance to attain a diversified energy mix, to balance out risks of oil shocks, ever present. From the findings of the study, it is suggested that the state can speed up renewable energy conversion, by participating in the market, through stock investments of already established companies. The state can have majority voting, and invest in these indigenously sourced energy renewable plants. Not just electricity generation, but biomass including ethanol, that can help reduce the dependence on oil.

Topic Category 生物資源暨農學院 > 農業經濟學研究所
生物農學 > 農業
Reference
  1. Berman E. 2006. Performance and Productivity in Public and Nonprofit Organizations: Strategic Planning. Chapter 4. Second Edition. M.E. Sharpe
    連結:
  2. Bielecki, J. 2002. “Energy security: is the wolf at the door?” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 42, 235-250.
    連結:
  3. Braunbeck O, Bauen A, Rosillo-Calle F, and Cortez L. 1999. “Prospects for green cane harvesting and cane residue use in Brazil”. Biomass and Bioenergy 17 (1999) 495–506.
    連結:
  4. Brown R E, Koomey J G. 2003. “Electricity use in California past trends and present usage patterns”. Energy Policy 31, 849-864.
    連結:
  5. Chester L. 2010. “Conceptualizing energy security and making explicit its polysemic nature”. Energy Policy;38:887–95.
    連結:
  6. Department of Energy (DOE). 2008. U. S. Annual Energy Review 2007.
    連結:
  7. Egenhofer C, Gialoglou K, Luciani G, Boots M, and Scheepers M. 2004. Market-based 
options for security of energy supply. INDES working paper no. 1.
    連結:
  8. Electrobras. 2013. Historia de Electrobras.
    連結:
  9. European Union (EU) Commission. 2009. Towards a comprehensive climate change agreement in Copenhagen: communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Conference: COM (2009) 39/9, Brussels.
    連結:
  10. European Commission (EC). 2000. Green Paper, Towards a European strategy for the security of energy supply. Brussels.
    連結:
  11. Fayol H. 1918. Administration Industrielle et Generale. Dunod. Paris.
    連結:
  12. Goldemberg J, Coelho S T, Nastari P, and Lucon O S. 2003 “Ethanol learning curve – The Brazilian experience”. Biomass and Bioenergy 26 3 (2003) 301–304.
    連結:
  13. Gupta E. 2008. “Oil vulnerability index of oil‐importing countries”. Energy Policy, 36(3), pp.1195‐ 1211.
    連結:
  14. Holzer M, Gabriellyan V, and Yang K. 2006. Handbook of Public Administration. “Five great ideas in American Public Administration”. CRC Press.
    連結:
  15. Hughes L. 2009. “The four ‘R's of energy security’. Energy Policy 37 (6): 2459-2461.
    連結:
  16. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 2006. Brazil: A Country Profile. http://www.iaea.org/OurWork/ST/NE/Pess/assets/BRAZIL_FINAL_24April06.pdf
    連結:
  17. International Energy Agency (IEA). 2007. Energy security and climate change policy interactions: an assessment framework. Paris: OECD/IEA.
    連結:
  18. International Energy Agency (IEA). 2007. Energy security and climate policy: assessing interactions. Paris: OECD/IEA.
    連結:
  19. Kaufman H. 2001. Major players: bureaucracies in American Government. Public Adminstration Review. January/February 2001. Vol. 61, No.1
    連結:
  20. Kettl D. 1999. Managing Indirect Government. Chapter sixteen. Pg 490-509.
    連結:
  21. Kruyt B, vanVuuren D P, deVries H J M, and Groenenberg H. 2009. “Indicators for energy security”. Energy Policy, 37, 2166-2181.
    連結:
  22. Macedo I C, and Cortez L. Sugar-cane industrial processing in Brazil. Industrial Uses of Biomass Energy – The Example of Brazil (Rosillo-Calle, F., Bajay, S.V., Rothman, H. Eds), Taylor & Francis, London, UK (2000) 277 pp.
    連結:
  23. McGuire M. 2006. “Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It”. Public Administrative Review. Dec 2006. Vol 66. Pg 33.
    連結:
  24. Medvitz A G.; and Sokolow, A. 1995. California Agriculture 49(6):11-17. DOI: 10.3733/ca.v049n06p11. November-December 1995.
    連結:
  25. Mendonca M, Jacobs D, and Sovacool B. 2010. Powering the Green Economy: The feed-in tariff handbook. Earthscan. London.
    連結:
  26. Moreira J R, and Goldemberg J. 1999. “The alcohol program”. Energy Policy 27 4 (1999) 229– 245.
    連結:
  27. National Biodiesel Board. 2006. FactSheet.
    連結:
  28. Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PGE). 2012. California Gas Report, Issues 2004-2011. http://www.pge.com/pipeline/library/regulatory/cgr_index.shtml
    連結:
  29. Pascual C, Elkind J, editors. 2010. Energy Security: Economics, Politics, Strategies, and Implications. Brookings Institution Press. Washington DC.
    連結:
  30. Petras J. 1977. “State Capitalism and the Third World”. Development and Change. 1-17.
    連結:
  31. Sioshansi H P. 2001. “California's dysfunctional electricity market policy lessons on market restructuring”. Energy Policy 29, 731-742.
    連結:
  32. Smith M D. 2002. “Lessons to be learned from California and Enron for Restructuring Electricity Markets”. The Electricity Journal, August-September 2002.
    連結:
  33. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2004. World Energy Assessment.Energy and the challenge of sustainability.
    連結:
  34. United Nations. 2009. Energy Balances and Electricity Profiles. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/energy/balance/‎
    連結:
  35. US Census Bureau. 2013. State and County QuickFacts: California. Last Revised: Thursday, 06-Jun-2013
    連結:
  36. Varanini III, E E. 1981. “The California Energy Approach: From Conventional To Alternative Energy Sources”. Energy, Vol.6, No. 8, pp 727-731.
    連結:
  37. von Hirschhausen C, and Neumann. 2003. A. Security of (Gas) supply: conceptual
    連結:
  38. issues, contractual arrangements, and the current EU situation. NL: INDES
    連結:
  39. New Jersey.
    連結:
  40. Werner U. 2002. ‘Public Policy Analysis’, in: The Informed Student Guide to
    連結:
  41. Management Science, ed. by H.G. Daellenbach and R.L. Flood, London: Thomson
    連結:
  42. Woo C K, Lloyd D, and Tishler A. 2003. “Electricity market reform failures:
    連結:
  43. Wright P. 2005. “Liberalization and the security of gas supply in the UK”. Energy
    連結:
  44. Yin R K. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand
    連結:
  45. Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC). 2000, Emergency Oil Stocks and Energy Security in the APEC Region, APEC#00-RE-01.2, Tokyo.
  46. Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC). 2007. A Quest for Energy Security in the 21st Century. Institute of Energy Economics. Tokyo : Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre. http://www.ieej.or.jp/aperc. ISBN 978-4-931482- 35-7.
  47. Amann E, Baer W, and Coes D V. 2011. Energy, Bio Fuels and Development: Comparing Brazil and the United States. Routledge. New York.
  48. Araujo B J. 1977. Intervencao economica do Estado e democracia. pp221-239. Estado e capitalism no Brasil. Sao Paolo Hucitec-Cebrap.
  49. Baer W, Newfarmer R, and Trebat T. 1976. On State Capitalism n Brazil” Some New Issues and Questions. Inter-American Economic Affairs. 30 (Winter). 69-96.
  50. Baxter P, and Jack S. “Qualitative Case Study Methodology”. The Qualitative Report Volume 13 Number 4 December 2008 544-559
  51. Bloomberg Businessweek. "Petrobras Raises $70 Billion as Investors See Growth". 24 September 2010. http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-09-24/petrobras-raises-70-billion-as-investors-see-growth.html. Retrieved 23 August 2011.
  52. Bohi D.R. and M.A. Toman. 1996. The economics of energy security. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Norwell, Massachusetts.
  53. Bourgon J. 2011. A new synthesis of Public Administration in the 21th Century. Chapter 3. Queens Univ School of Policy.
  54. California Energy Commission (CEC). 2011. Integrated Energy Policy Report. www.energy.ca.gov/2011_energypolicy/index.html.
  55. California Energy Commission (CEC). 2012. California’s Clean Energy Future. www.cacleanenergyfuture.org/documents/cacleanenergyfutureoverview.pdf
  56. California Energy Commission (CEC). 2011. Energy Almanac: Energy Sources. http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/overview/energy_sources.html
  57. California Energy Commission (CEC). 2013. Petroleum Industry Information Reporting Act http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/petroleum/statistics/crude_oil_receipts.html
  58. California Energy Commission (CEC). 2010. Energy Almanac 2010: Electric Load-Serving Entities (LSEs) in California.. http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/electricity/utilities.html
  59. California Energy Commission (CEC). 2013. Quarterly Fuel and Energy Report (QFER) CEC-1304 Power Plant Owner Reporting Database.. http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/electricity/web_qfer/
  60. California Energy Commission (CEC). June 2005. Energy Demand Forecast Methods Report, CEC. http://www.energy.ca.gov/2005publications/CEC-400-2005-036/CEC-400-2005-036.PDF
  61. California Energy Comission (CEC). 2012. Energy Almanac: Age of Generating Units of California's Power Plants as of 2011. http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/electricity/generating_units.html
  62. California Energy Commission (CEC). 2013. Energy Almanac: Estimated 2013 Gasoline Price Breakdown & Margins Details. http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/gasoline/margins/index.php
  63. California Energy Commission (CEC). 2006. Recommendations for a Bioenergy Action Plan. http://www.energy.ca.gov/2006publications/CEC-600-2006-004/CEC-600-2006-004-F.PDF
  64. California Energy Commission (CEC). 2005. Draft Report An Assessment of Biomass Resources in California, 2005. California Energy Commission, Sacramento, CA., Contract number 500-01-016.
  65. California Energy Commission (CEC). 2005. Biomass in California, Challenges, Opportunities and Potential for Sustainable Management and Development. California Energy Commission, Sacramento, CA., Contract number 500-01-016.
  66. California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). 2011. Decision 11-12- 020. Decision Setting Procurement Quantity Requirements for Retail Sellers for the Renewables Portfolio Standard Program. docs.cpuc.ca.gov/WORD_PDF/FINAL_DE- CISION/154695.PDF.
  67. California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). 2013. Public Utilities Commission net qualifying capacity (NQC).
  68. http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUC/energy/Procurement/RA/ra_compliance_materials.htm
  69. Camara de Comercializacao de Energia Eletrica (CCEE). 2005. Papeis e Responsabilidades. www.ifba.edu.br/professores/castro/ccee.pdf
  70. Camara de Comercializacao de Energia Eletrica (CCEE). 2013. Preco de Liquidacao de Diferencas - PLD medio mensal. http://www.ccee.org.br/portal/wcm/idc/groups/bibpublic_precos/documents/conteudoccee/ccee_112640.pdf
  71. CIA World Factbook. 2013. Brazil. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/br.html
  72. Cowing T G, McFadden D L. 1984. Microeconomic Modeling and Policy Analysis: Studies in Residential Energy Demand. Academic Press Inc. Orlando, Florida.
  73. http://nca2009.globalchange.gov/references/author/10. http://nca2009.globalchange.gov/references/annual-energy-review-2007-0
  74. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy, 2008.
  75. Department of Energy (DOE). 2013. About the California Energy Commission. http://www.energy.ca.gov/commission/.
  76. Department of Energy (DOE). 2013. Who's Who in California's Energy Industry and Regulatory Bodies http://www.energy.ca.gov/newsroom/links.html.
  77. Department of Energy (DOE). Biomass Development Program, created by Senate Bill 771. http://www.energy.ca.gov/biomass/biomass.html.
  78. Developing a logic model: Teaching and training guide. 2008. University of Wisconsin. Program Development and Evaluation. (PDE)
  79. Department of Finance of California. 2012. Maps of July 2012 County Estimates Ranks and Components of Change.
  80. http://www.petrobras.com.br/en/about-us/our-history/
  81. http://www.eletrobras.com/elb/data/Pages/LUMISB33DBED6PRINTPTBRIE.htm
  82. Empresa de Pesquisa Energetica (EPE). 2013. Power Expansion Plan (PEP).
  83. Empresa de Pesquisa Energetica (EPE). 2013. Balance Energetico Generais (BEN). https://ben.epe.gov.br/downloads/Resultados_Pre_BEN_2012.pdf‎
  84. Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2006. US Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Natural Gas Liquids Reserves. Annual Report.
  85. European Union (EU) Commission, 2008. Impact assessment commission staff working document. Accompanying the Package of Implementation
  86. European Union (EU) Commission. 2008. Measures for the EU’s Objectives on Climate Change and Renewable Energy for 2020. Conference: Brussels, 23 January 2008, SEC (2008).
  87. Escelsa. 2013. Perfil. http://www.escelsa.com.br/aescelsa/historia-ee-brasil.asp.
  88. Fava Neves M, Alves Pinto M J, Conejero M A, and Trombin V G. 2011. Food and fuel: The Example of Brazil. Wageningen Academic Publishers. The Netherlands.
  89. Frances H. 1986. State Capitalism And Politics In Brazil. Kellogg Institute. Working paper #63. February 1986
  90. Greene D, and Ahmad S. 2005. Costs of U.S. oil dependence: 2005 update (January 2005),Rep. to U.S.DOE, 
ORNL/5002−MT/45, Oak Ridge, TN
  91. Intituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estadistica (Fundacao IBGE). 1984. Annuario Estadistico do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro. Secretaria de Planeamiento da Presidencia da Republica.
  92. Isbell P. 2007. Revisiting Energy Security. ARI, no 123, Real Instituto Elcano, diciembre.
  93. Jansen J C, van Arkel W G and Boots M G. 2004. Designing indicators of long‐term energy supply security. Energy research Centre of the Netherlands: Petten, Netherlands.
  94. Kohl W. 2004. National Security and Energy. Encyclopedia of Energy. Oxford: Elsevier Academic Press, 193-206
  95. Ministerio de Minas y Energia. 2013. Resenha Energetica Brasileira – Edition 2013.
  96. Muller-Kraenner S. 2007. Energy Security: Re-measuring the world. London. Earthscan.
  97. Operador National do Sistema Electrico (ONS). 2007. Instrucoes aos Proponentes, Minuta de Contrato e Especificacao dos Servicos e Materiais, ONS. http://www.ons.org.br/concorrencias/documentos/ADG_003_2013/IP-AnexoI-AnexoII.zip
  98. http://www.biodiesel.org/buyingbiodiesel/producers_marketers/ProducersMap-Existing.pdf
  99. Rubino J. 2009. Clean Money: Picking Winners in the Green-tech Boom Wiley. New Jersey.
  100. Scheepers M J J, Seebregts A J, Jong J J de, Maters J M. 2007. EU Standards for Energy Security of Supply, ECN report number ECN-E—07-004, 2007.
  101. Taylor F. 1911. The Principles of Scientific Management. Harper & Brothers. New York.
  102. Visao. 1983. Quem na Economia Brasileira Edicao Especial. 29 de agosto, Ano
  103. XXX, no 34A
  104. Workshop.
  105. Weimer D L, Vining A R. 2005. Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice. Pearson.
  106. Learning, pp. 213-215.
  107. Wesley M. (Ed.). 2007. Energy Security in Asia. Routledge, London.
  108. Norway, Alberta and California”. Energy Policy, 31, 1103-1115.
  109. Policy 33 (17), 2272–2290.
  110. Oaks, CA: Sage.