Title

營農能力訓練成效之研究─以農民學院訓練課程為例

Translated Titles

The Training Effectiveness on Farming Ability: The Case Study of training programs of Farmers’ Academy

DOI

10.6342/NTU.2015.02534

Authors

王勝平

Key Words

訓練成效 ; 營農能力 ; 農民學院 ; 營農績效 ; training effectiveness ; professional farming abilities ; professional farming performance

PublicationName

臺灣大學生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2015年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

王俊豪

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

本研究主要目的在於探討農民學院之訓練課程對於營農能力的提升是否具有成效,並以客觀的訓練成效資訊來探討參訓資格之分類標準是否合宜,進而探討農民學院訓練課程所提升之營農能力是否有助於提升其營農績效。 本研究採用101年度與102年度參與農民學院訓練課程的學員所填寫之訓練績效評核問卷為調查資料,並運用Wilcoxon 符號等級檢定、t-檢定、主成分分析法、多元迴歸分析、兩階段最小平方法等研究方法進行資料分析。 本研究結果顯示,農民學院訓練課程對於參訓學員的營農能力有顯著提升;現行農民學院有關參訓資格的分類標準尚無法明確區分合宜的參訓對象;營農能力的提升中,以「生產、人資與研發能力」的提升對營農績效較有幫助。 本研究建議農民學院訓練課程的參訓資格條件可進一步檢討與調整,或在參訓資格條件下設定各階訓練課程的學員篩選與評分機制;訓練課程內容之規劃係為提升農民之營農能力,且所提升之營農能力應能對其營農績效有所助益;至於訓練成效則應持續追蹤,方能確實瞭解、評估訓練課程對於提升營農能力與營農績效之影響。

English Abstract

The main focus of this study is to investigate the impact of The Farmers' Academy training programs on the improvement of professional farming ability, analysis of whether the participation criteria for these training programs are appropriate standards of differentiation using objective data such as training effectiveness, and exploration of whether the training programs designed to improve farmers' professional abilities truly contribute to the elevation of professional farming performance. This study utilized data from training performance evaluation surveys of The Farmers' Academy trainees from 2012 and 2013. Data analysis was conducted using research methodologies such as Wilcoxon signed-rank test, t-test, principal components analysis, multiple regression analysis, and two stage least squares. Research findings suggest that The Farmers' Academy training programs significantly contribute to improving the professional farming abilities of participating trainees. Nevertheless, current participation criteria standards of differentiation are inadequate for clearly distinguishing suitable trainees. Among all the improved abilities of professional farmers, advances in "production, human resource and research and development abilities" are most beneficial towards elevating professional farming performance. It is recommended that The Farmers' Academy training program participation criteria undergo further evaluation and adjustment, or that trainee selection and evaluation mechanisms should be established according to the participation criteria of each program level. The training programs are designed to improve the professional farming abilities of participating farmers. These improved abilities should therefore contribute toward enhancing farming performance. The effectiveness of training programs should also be continuously monitored in order to clearly understand and evaluate the ways in which programs have contributed toward elevating both professional farming abilities and farming performance.

Topic Category 生物資源暨農學院 > 生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所
生物農學 > 生物科學
Reference
  1. 倪葆真(2012),「農民學院規劃與推動」。農業推廣文彙,第57輯,345-349頁。
    連結:
  2. 陳尚蓉(2006) ,「農漁民第二專長訓練成效評估之研究」。農業推廣文彙。第52輯, 59-64頁。
    連結:
  3. 楊淑美(2012),商業類群職業訓練成效之研究-以會計職類為例。國立臺北大學會計學系碩士論文。
    連結:
  4. Bushnell, D.S.,(1990), “Input, Process, Output : A Model for Evaluating Training,” Training & Development Journal, vol.44,no.3,41-43.
    連結:
  5. Kaufman, R., Keller, J., & Watkins, R. (1995), “What works and what don’t: Evaluation beyond Kirkpatrick,” Performance and Instruction, 35(2), 8-12.
    連結:
  6. Kong, W.H. & Fu, T.T. (2012), “Assessing the performance of business colleges in Taiwan using data envelopment analysis and student based value-added performance indicators,” Omega, vol.40, 541-549.
    連結:
  7. Molenda, M., Pershing, J., & Reigeluth, C. (1996), “Designing instructional systems”, in R.Craig (Ed.). The ASTD training and development handbook: A guide to human resource development (4th ed), McGraw-Hill, 266-293.
    連結:
  8. 中文部份
  9. 王勝平(2011),農民學院揭牌典禮暨菁英學堂開講活動。農政與農情第234期。
  10. 王勝平(2013),農民學院─資訊服務平台。農政與農情第248期。
  11. 王勝平(2013),農民學院─農場見習實務。農政與農情第248期。
  12. 台灣農業推廣學會(2011),農民學院受訓資格及結訓評核規劃之研究 。100年度行政院農業委員會科技計畫研究報告。
  13. 台灣農業推廣學會(2013),提升農業培訓效能之策略研究-農民學院訓練成效評核之研究。102年度行政院農業委員會科技計畫研究報告。
  14. 李凱雄(2011),中區職訓中心辦理產訓合作訓練成效之研究-以商用車輛維修班為例。逢甲大學運輸科技與管理學系碩士論文。
  15. 李聲吼(1997),人力資源發展。台北:五南,86-93。
  16. 徐國陽(2006),教育訓練對國軍團隊建立訓練成效之研究。國立體育學院休閒產業經營學系碩士班碩士論文。
  17. 高文彬(2012),人力資源發展-職能基礎觀點。雙葉書廊有限公司,台北市。
  18. 郭依婷(2011),在職訓練、知覺組織支持與訓練成效之研究: Kirkpatrick 層次評估模型之觀點。國立臺中教育大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。
  19. 陳沁怡(2012),人力訓練與發展(二版)。雙葉書廊有限公司,台北市。
  20. 趙亞麗(2012),組織學習與知識管理提升教官職能對訓練成效之研究:以某陸軍訓練學校為例。國立屏東科技大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
  21. 蔡志恒、黃煥榮與孫本初(2011),「我國中央政府中高階公務人員訓練之績效評估-以專業核心能力為基礎」,T&D 飛訊,第123期,1-31頁。
  22. 蔡佳旂(2011),醫療機構服務品質訓練成效之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
  23. 賴怡黛(2009),航空業空勤組員先期培訓機構訓練成效之研究-以航空補習班為例。銘傳大學觀光研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。
  24. 農委會(2014),「農民學院訓練課程規劃及學員輔導與追蹤機制」檢討報告。
  25. 英文部份
  26. Kirkpatrick, D.L.,(1959), “Techniques for Evaluating Training Programs,” Journal of the American Society of Training Directors, vol.13, no.11,3-9.
  27. Stufflebeam, D.L.,(1969), “Evaluation as enlightenment for decision-making,” in H. B. Walcott (Ed.), Improving educational assessment and an inventory of measures of affective behavior. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development and National Education Association, 41-73.
  28. Warr, P. B., Bird, M. and Rackham, N.,(1970), The Evaluation of Management Training, Gower.
Times Cited
  1. 李明坤(2017)。顧客關係管理與社會支持及受訓績效間關係之研究-以海軍受訓班隊為例。義守大學公共政策與管理學系學位論文。2017。1-82。