Title

東亞九國主要產業在美、歐市場競爭力分析

Translated Titles

An Analysis on Competitiveness of East Asian Export

DOI

10.6846/TKU.2005.00366

Authors

陳怡玲

Key Words

顯示性比較利益 ; 產業內貿易 ; 產品多樣性 ; revealed comparative advantage ; internal industrial trade ; product variety

PublicationName

淡江大學國際貿易學系國際企業學碩士班學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2005年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

吳秀玲

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

出口是東亞經濟發展最大的推升動力,但由於東亞地區生產的貨品相似,為保持相對出口優勢,往往採取低匯率的政策利於出口,因此本研究所要探討的問題是:究竟東亞各國所擔心的匯率升值將導致東亞九國出口競爭力下滑的憂慮是事實呢?還是國外需求的成長或其他因素才是決定實質出口成長的更重要關鍵? 本研究之主要目的是由東亞各國出口相似性之角度出發,以各國之主要出口競爭產業為主,探討匯率、比較利益、產業垂直分工及產品多樣性等因素在東亞各國出口競爭力變動中所扮演的重要性,並討論影響東亞各國出口競爭力的關鍵因素。 本文將以1997-2003年東亞九國包括台灣、中國、韓國、香港、新加坡、泰國、馬來西亞、印尼、菲律賓等之產業別資料來進行分析,並分別比較各國各產業在美國及歐洲兩大市場的競爭態勢。選取之產業別包括塑膠及其製品(HS39)、梭織成衣(HS62)、鋼鐵製品(HS73)、機械產品(HS84)、電機產品(HS85)、汽車相關產品(HS87)等。 根據實證結果發現,匯率並非是1997-2003年間東亞九國六大競爭產業的競爭力所在,因此破除了東亞國家的憂慮,升值並非導致東亞出口競爭力下滑的因素。進口國對某產業需求、國內供給能力、比較利益、產品多樣性程度以及產業內貿易程度因素更是東亞九國六大產業出口美國與歐盟市場中,競爭力變動的重要影響關鍵。東亞九國中,以中國所擁有的獨特國家別效果最多,六大產業皆有,顯示中國低廉的勞動成本與廣大的土地,是促使中國產業競爭力增強的重要因素。而台灣在面對中國的強力競爭時,應藉由提升技術、開發新產品、加強設計、產業升級等方式,來加強台灣的產業競爭力,避免與中國在勞力密集產業、低品質、低價產品中競爭。

English Abstract

In East Asian countries export plays a vital role in developing their economy. The products made by the firms in the 9 countries of East Asia including Taiwan, China, Thailand, Hong Kong, Korea, Philippine, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, however, are very similar;The government officers of the 9 countries of East Asia usually make a policy of devaluating their currency in order to stimulating their export. What this study investigates is to recognize the foreign exchange rate that is inflating or devaluating as an important factor of affecting competence power of the 9 countries of East Asia, or growth of demand from foreign countries as the key factor. The purpose of this paper is to study which one is the main factor of affecting the competence power of East Asia countries by foreign exchange rate, revealed comparative advantage, internal industrial trade and product variety, furthermore, what is the dominant factor of affecting the competence power of the 9 countries of East Asia. This study analyzes the competence situation that the 6 industries (plastic, woven apparel, iron/steel products, machinery, electrical machinery, vehicles) of the 9 East Asian countries operate in United States and European Union. According to the empirical evidence of this paper, foreign exchange rate is not the key factor of competing in the 6 industries of the 9 East Asian countries. An imported country’s demand for a certain industry, domestic supply ability, revealed comparative advantage, and product variety are more important than foreign exchange rate in competing in U.S. and European market.

Topic Category 商學院 > 國際貿易學系國際企業學碩士班
社會科學 > 經濟學
社會科學 > 管理學
Reference
  1. 黃台心,2004,計量經濟學,雙業走廊。
    連結:
  2. Arellano, M., and S. Bond (1991), “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations,” Review of Economic Studies, 58, 29- 51.
    連結:
  3. Athukorala, P. and J. Riedel (1990), “How Valid is the Small Country Assumption,” mimeo, Johns Hopkins University.
    連結:
  4. Breusch, T. and A. Pagan (1980),”The LM test and its applications to model specification in econometrics”, Review of Economic Studies,47,239-254.
    連結:
  5. Funke, M., and R. Ruhwedel (2001), “Export Variety and Export Performance: Empirical Evidence from East Asia,” Journal of Asian Economics, 12, 493- 505.
    連結:
  6. Goldstein, M., and M.S. Khan (1978), “The Supply and Demand for Exports: a Simultaneous Approach,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, 275- 285.
    連結:
  7. Hausman, J. (1978), “Specification tests in econometrics”, Econometrica, 46, 1251-1271.
    連結:
  8. Muscatelli, V.A., A.A. Stevenson and C. Montagna (1995), “Modeling Aggregate Manufactured Exports for Some Asian Newly Industrialized Economies,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, 147- 155.
    連結:
  9. Riedel, J. (1988), “The Demand for LDC Exports of Manufactures: Estimates from Hong Kong,” Economic Journal, 98, 138- 148.
    連結:
  10. Wu, H. and C. Chen (2004), ‘Changes in Foreign Market Competitiveness of East Asian Exports’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 34.4, 503-522.
    連結:
  11. Yue, C. and P. Hua (2002), ‘Does Comparative Advantage Explains Export Patterns in China?’ China Economic Review, 13, 276-296.
    連結:
  12. 中文部分
  13. 李信宏,2004,印尼紡織業所面臨的挑戰,經濟部ITIS產業資訊服務網。
  14. 洪炎星,2003,中國大陸鋼鐵產業發展策略解析,經濟部ITIS產業資訊服務網。
  15. 倪碧瑩,2002,美國成衣產業進出口簡析,經濟部ITIS產業資訊服務網。
  16. 倪碧瑩,2004,台灣紡織產業創匯再度挑戰100億美元大關,經濟部ITIS產業資訊服務網。
  17. 倪碧瑩,2004,2003年全球紡織品與成衣貿易概況,經濟部ITIS產業資訊服務網。
  18. 張嘉仁,2004,我國汽車零組件產業概況,經濟部ITIS產業資訊服務網。
  19. 黃國維,2001,2001年台灣塑膠製品回顧與未來展望,經濟部ITIS產業資訊服務網。
  20. 蔡金坤,2001,我國電機產業結構與科專計畫研發方向,經濟部ITIS產業資訊服務網。
  21. 劉信宏,2004,台灣機械產業利潤率分析,經濟部ITIS產業資訊服務網。
  22. 戴志言,2004,2003年中國大陸汽車產業現況與發展趨勢分析(上) ,經濟部ITIS產業資訊服務網。
  23. 英文部分
  24. Feentra, R.C. (1994), “New Product Varieties and the Measurement of International Prices,” American Economic Review, 84, 157- 177.
  25. Grubel, H.G., and P.J. Lloy (1975), Intra Industry Trade, The Macmillan Press Ltd, London.
  26. Hendry, D.F. (1987), “Econometric Methodology: A Personal Perspective,” in T. Bewley (ed.) Advances in Econometric Analysis of Small Linear Systems Using PC-FIML, 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  27. Hsiao, C. (1986), ‘Analysis of Panel Data’, Camberidge University Press, Camberidge.
Times Cited
  1. 武宏鈞(2010)。發展型國家與國家競爭力之關係:以新加坡為例。中興大學國際政治研究所學位論文。2010。1-148。 
  2. 林豈(2017)。台灣平板玻璃產業出口競爭力實證分析。臺中科技大學企業管理系碩士班學位論文。2017。1-100。