產險再保績效評量指標之研究

A Study on Reinsurance Performance Indicators in Non-Life Insurance

于靜文(Ching-Wen Yu)

指導教授 ： 廖述源

共同指導教授 ： 呂慧芬

淡江大學/商管學院/保險學系保險經營碩士班/碩士(2015年)

https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2015.00710

摘要

由於我國產險承保能量有限，加上近年來天災人禍頻繁，導致損失幅度與頻率加劇，產險公司經營特性便是再保險依存度高。對產險公司而言，再保險是一項重大避險成本，產險公司再保費支出愈多，轉嫁危險愈多，卻可能侵蝕經營利潤；再保費支出愈少，自留保費愈多，自留賠款過大亦侵害經營利潤，必須拿捏適當，然我國產險業並未建構一套完善再保績效考核機制；基此，建構產險公司之再保績效評量指標，改善與修正再保險運用，提升再保險單位效率，確實有其必要性。

本研究先運用文獻回顧法整理並加以論述再保險相關基礎理論，而後本研究針對再保險相關因素擬定再保分出與再保分進兩大類型指標，各別擬定十六項與十五項量性指標，且以質性指標加以輔助其完整性，並詳加說明各項指標之涵義，使再保險績效評量指標更具公平客觀性。最後，本研究使用個案研究法，以模擬數據分析五家產險公司之再保績效並分析個體與總體比較結果，期使產險公司未來運用實際數據進行再保績效評量，了解再保險運用之優劣與缺失，作為修正之依據。

關鍵字

再保險 ； 再保險績效 ； 再保險類型

並列摘要

For property-liability insurers, reinsurance plays an important role in operating insurance business and is a great hedging cost for insurance companies. Property-liability insurers in Taiwan, generally speaking, have high reinsurance dependence due to the limited capacity. Striking a balance between reinsurance premium and premium retained is crucial in terms of industry management; however, most property-liability insurers in Taiwan do not have an appropriate performance appraisal for reinsurance. A particular emphasis on setting the reinsurance performance indicators helps reinsurance departments with their operation as well as the work efficiency raising. Thus, the aim of this study is to establish appropriate reinsurance performance indicators.

This thesis presented the basic theory of reinsurance utilizing Inductive Approach initially. Then based on the factors of reinsurance profile, two classifications, reinsurance ceded and reinsurance assumed, could be made. In order to reach a more objective performance evaluation on reinsurance, a sixteen and fifteen performance indicators were proposed to evaluate reinsurance ceded and reinsurance assumed respectively. Also case study methodology was utilized to analyze reinsurance performance on five companies in the industry. The result suggested property and liability insurance companies shall evaluate reinsurance performance based on actual data in order to acknowledge pros and cons of the activity.

並列關鍵字

Reinsurance ； Reinsurance Performance ； Types of Reinsurance

參考文獻

3. 李珍穎，台灣產險業經營績效分析與提昇之研究-從財務面與非財務面觀點探討，淡江大學管理科學學系博士班博士論文，2002年6月。

4. 吳靜宜，產險理賠績效評量指標之研究，淡江大學保險學系保險經營碩士班，2012年6月。

6. 林慧紋，產險核保績效評量指標之研究，淡江大學保險學系保險經營碩士班，2010年6月。

1. Calandro, J. and Scott, L. ,“The insurance performance measure (IPM): Bringing value to the insurance industry”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance ,Volume14,Issue4,Winter2002, pp.8-13.

2. Calandro, J. and Scott, L. ,“Why the Property and Casualty Insurance Industry Needs a New Performance Measure”, Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 8 , No. 2,2004, pp.31-39.