Title

南投縣布農語南部方言(南島)之依附詞

Translated Titles

Clitics in Nantou Isbukun Bunun (Austronesian)

DOI

10.6837/NCNU.2010.00311

Authors

李俐盈

Key Words

依附詞 ; 詞組依附詞 ; 鄰近中心語依附詞 ; 布農語郡社方言 ; clitic ; phrasal clitics ; head-adjacent clitics ; Isbukun Bunun

PublicationName

暨南大學外國語文學系學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2010年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

畢樂仁

Content Language

英文

Chinese Abstract

本論文旨在發掘南投縣布農語郡社方言(Nantou Isbukun Bunun)的依附詞 (clitic)。第一章說明布農語郡社方言的地理位置分布、語態格位系統(voice/case system),以及名詞格位標示變化(case-marking paradigm)。第二章提供依附詞詞序及它們在句中相對位置之文獻回顧。第三章討論布農語郡社方言動詞後附著詞素的相對位置。第四章揭示附著詞素在非動詞為首的句中位置並證明它們為依附詞。最後,第五章點出尚未分析的新發現,並總結此篇論文。 本論文用構詞句法介面還有音韻的證據來說明南投縣布農語郡社方言非代名詞與代名詞詞素為依附詞。此外,依附詞需要區分為詞組依附詞(phrasal clitic)以及鄰近中心語依附詞(head-adjacent clitic)。本文發現南投縣布農語郡社方言同時擁有這兩種依附詞。在以動詞為首(verb-initial)的句子中,以上所述的依附詞皆附在動詞後,動詞後非代名詞依附詞內部相對位置是代表時貌(aspectual)的依附詞會排在表示說話者親知(evidential)的依附詞之前,而代名詞依附詞則是排在上述這些依附詞之後。而動詞後代名詞依附詞內部相對位置(internal ordering)並非只取決於語意角色(semantic role),而是還有受到論元關係(grammatical relations)或是格位(morphological cases)影響;就另一方面而言,在否定句中,只有代表主語(subject)或是代表主格(nominative-case)的代名詞會被吸引放置在動詞前的位置。

English Abstract

This thesis aims to explore the clitics in Isbukun Bunun spoken in Nantou. Chapter 1 presents the geographical distribution, voice/case systems, and case-marking paradigms of Isbukun. Chapter 2 provides the theoretical accounts with respect to clitic ordering and placement. Chapter 3 then discusses the relative order among various postverbal bound elements in Isbukun. Chapter 4 demonstrates the placement of these bound elements relative to the clause with a preverbal element and establishes whether they are clitics. Finally, chapter 5 concludes this thesis, where any unexpected findings are discussed. This thesis reports that in Nantou Isbukun Bunun short personal pronouns and T(emporal)A(spectual)E(vidential) markers are clitics by using morphosyntactic and phonological evidence. Clitics are classified into two main kinds: phrasal and head-adjacent. In Isbukun both kinds of clitics are found. With respect to their placement, on the one hand, these clitics are positioned postverbally in verb-initial clauses. The cluster-internal ordering among these postverbal elements is with the aspectual clitics preceding the evidential clitic, itself preceding pronominal clitics; the relative ordering of two postverbal pronominal clitics is determined by not only semantic roles, but also grammatical relations (or morphological cases). On the other hand, only the subject (or nominative-case) clitic pronoun can be attracted to preverbal position in a negated clause.

Topic Category 人文學 > 外國文學
人文學院 > 外國語文學系
Reference
  1. Allan, Keith. 2007. The western classical tradition in Linguistics. London: Equinox.
    連結:
  2. Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous morphology (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    連結:
  3. Anderson, Stephen R. 1993. “Wackernagel’s revenge: Clitics, morphology, and the syntax of second position.” Language 69(1). 68–98.
    連結:
  4. Billings, Loren A. 2005. “Ordering clitics and postverbal R-expressions in Tagalog: A unified analysis?” In Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley, & Sheila Ann Dooley (eds.), Verb first: On the syntax of verb-initial languages (Linguistik Aktuell 73). 303–339. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    連結:
  5. Blust, Robert. 2002. “Notes on the history of “focus” in Austronesian languages.” In Fay Wouk & Malcolm Ross (eds.), The history and typology of western Austronesian voice systems (Pacific Linguistics 518). Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University. 63–78.
    連結:
  6. Brainard, Sherri, & Ena Vander Molen. 2005. “Word order inverse in Obo Manobo.” In Hsiu-chuan Liao & Carl R. Galvez Rubino (eds.), Current issues in Philippine linguistics and anthropology: Parangal kay Lawrence A. Reid. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
    連結:
  7. Browne, Wayles. 1974. “On the problem of enclitic placement in Serbo-Croatian.” In Richard D. Brecht & Catherine V. Chvany (eds.), Slavic transformational syntax (Michigan Slavic Materials 10). Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications. 36–52.
    連結:
  8. Chang, Yung-Li. 1999. “Seediq bound pronouns: Pronominal clitics or agreement affixes?” In Elizabeth Zeitoun & Paul Jen-kuei Li (eds.), Selected papers from the 8th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics (Symposium Series of the Institute of Linguistics). Taipei: Institute of Linguistics (Preparatory Office), Academia Sinica. 355–370.
    連結:
  9. Chen, David Kuan-nan, & Silvia Yu-ju Hung. 2007. “Optimality-theoretic analysis of pronoun-ordering typology.” Presented at the 8th National Conference on Linguistics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan.
    連結:
  10. Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge University Press.
    連結:
  11. Cysouw, Michael. 2005. “Morphology in the wrong place: A survey of preposed enclitics.” In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer, & Franz Rainer (eds.), Morphology and its demarcations: Selected papers from the 11th Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2004 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 4.264). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 17–37.
    連結:
  12. Egerod, Soren. 1965. “Verb inflexion in Atayal.” Lingua 15. 251–282.
    連結:
  13. Elson, Mark J. 1976. “The definite article in Bulgarian and Macedonian.” The Slavic and East European Journal 20(3). 273–279.
    連結:
  14. Erickson, Barbara E. 1965. “Patterns of person-number reference in Potawatomi.” International Journal of American Linguistics 31(3). 226–236.
    連結:
  15. Fischer, Susan D. 1996. “The role of agreement and auxiliaries in sign language.” Lingua 98 (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 38). 103–119.
    連結:
  16. Foley, William A., & Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    連結:
  17. Grimshaw, Jane. 2001. “Optimal clitic positions and the lexicon in Romance clitic systems.” In Géraldine Legendre, Jane Grimshaw, & Sten Vikner (eds.), Optimality-theoretic syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. 205–240.
    連結:
  18. Hetzron, Robert. 1972. “Phonology in syntax.” Journal of Linguistics 8(2). 251–265.
    連結:
  19. Holmer, Arthur. 1996. A parametric grammar of Seediq (Travaux de l’Institut de linguistique de Lund 30). Lund: Lund University Press.
    連結:
  20. Huang, Hui-chuan J. 2005. “On the status of onglides in Isbukun Bunun.” Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 31(1). 1–20.
    連結:
  21. Huang, Hui-chuan J. 2006. “Resolving vowel clusters: A comparison of Isbukun Bunun and Squliq Atayal.” Language and Linguistics 7(1). 1–26.
    連結:
  22. Huang, Hui-chuan J. 2008. “Competition between syllabic and metrical constraints in two Bunun dialects.” Linguistics 46(1). 1–32.
    連結:
  23. Huang, Lillian M. 1989. “The pronominal system in Atayal.” Studies in English Literature and Linguistics 15. 115–133.
    連結:
  24. Huang, Lillian M. 1995. “The pronominal system in Mayrinax, Atayal.” Studies in English Literature and Linguistics. 21(June). 107–146.
    連結:
  25. Huang, Lillian M., Elizabeth Zeitoun, Marie M. Yeh, Anna H. Chang, & Joy J. Wu. 1999. “A typological overview of pronominal systems of some Formosan languages.” In 王旭 [Hsu Wang], 曹逢甫 [Feng-fu Tsao], & 連金發 [Chin-fa Lien] (eds.), 第五屆漢語語言學國際研討會選文論文集 [Selected papers from the 5th International Conference on Chinese Linguistics]. 臺北 [Taipei]: 文鶴 [Crane]. 165–198.
    連結:
  26. Huang, Shuping, & Li-May Sung. 2008. “The Undergoer Focus ma- in Kavalan.” Oceanic Linguistics 47(1). 159–184.
    連結:
  27. Jeng, Heng-syung. 1999. “Bunun tense and aspect.” In 齊莉莎 [Elizabeth Zeitoun] &李壬癸 [Paul Jen-kuei Li] (eds.), 第八屆國際南島語言學會議論文選集 [Selected papers from the eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics] (中央研究院語言學研究所籌備處會議論文集第一冊 [Symposium Series of the Institute of Linguistics 1]). 臺北 [Taipei]: 中央研究院語言學研究所籌備處 [Institute of Linguistics (Preparatory Office), Academia Sinica]. 455–487.
    連結:
  28. Klavans, Judith L. 1985. “The independence of syntax and phonology in cliticization.” Language 61(1). 95–120.
    連結:
  29. Levine, Robert D. 1980. “On the lexical origin of the Kwakwala passive.” International Journal of American Linguistics 46. 240–259.
    連結:
  30. Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1988/2004. “A comparative study of Bunun dialects.” Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philosophy 59(2). 479–508 (republished in his 台灣南島語言論文選集 [Selected papers on Formosan languages] (《語言暨語言學》專刊丙種之三 [Language and Linguistics Monograph Series C–3.1]). 臺北 [Taipei]: 中央研究院語言學研究所 [Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica]. 743–766).
    連結:
  31. Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1997b/2004. “A syntactic typology of Formosan Languages—case markers on nouns and pronouns.” In 鄭秋豫 [Tseng Chiu-yu] (ed.), 中國境內語言暨語言學第四輯:語言類型 [Chinese Languages and Linguistics IV: Typological studies of languages in China] (中央研究院歷史語言研究所會議論文集之二 [Symposium Series of the Institute of History and Philology 2]). 台北 [Taipei]: 中央研究院歷史語言研究所 [Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica]. 343–378 (republished in his 台灣南島語言論文選集 [Selected papers on Formosan languages] (《語言暨語言學》專刊丙種之三 [Language and Linguistics Monograph Series C–3.1]). 臺北 [Taipei]: 中央研究院 [Academia Sinica]. 443–477).
    連結:
  32. Liao, Hsiu-chuan. 2004. Transitivity and ergativity in Formosan and Philippine languages. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa PhD dissertation.
    連結:
  33. Liao, Hsiu-chuan. 2005. “Another look at the order of clitic pronouns in Wulai Atayal.” Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 31(1). 47–63.
    連結:
  34. Marantz, Alec. 1988. “Clitics, morphological merger, and the mapping to phonological structure.” In Michael Hammond & Michael Noonan (eds.), Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in modern linguistics. San Diego: Academic Press. 253–270.
    連結:
  35. Mason, J. Alden. 1916. “Tepecano, A Piman language of western Mexico.” Annals of the New York Academy of Science 25. 309–416.
    連結:
  36. McCarthy, John J. 2002. A thematic guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    連結:
  37. McKaughan, Howard P. 1959. “Semantic components of pronoun systems: Maranao.” Word 15(1). 101–102.
    連結:
  38. Müller, Gereon. 1999/2003. “Optionality in Optimality-theoretic syntax.” In Lisa Cheng & Rint Sybesma (eds.), The 2nd Glot International state-of-the-article book (Studies in Generative Grammar 61). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 289–321 (significantly corrected version of the original in Glot International 4(5). 3–8).
    連結:
  39. Pearson, Matthew. 2005. “The Malagasy subject/topic as an A’ element.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23(2). 381–457.
    連結:
  40. Pittman, Richard S. 1965. “The fused subject and object pronouns of Red Pheasant Cree.” Linguistics 13(3). 34–38.
    連結:
  41. Post, Ursula, & Mary Jane Gardner. 1992. “Binukid dictionary.” Studies in Philippine Linguistics 9(2). i–xxviii; 1–210.
    連結:
  42. Reid, Lawrence A., & Hsiu-chuan Liao. 2004. “A brief syntactic typology of Philippine languages.” Language and Linguistics 5(2). 433–490.
    連結:
  43. Ross, Malcolm. 2006. “Reconstructing the case-marking and personal pronoun systems of Proto Austronesian.” In 張永利 [Henry Y. Chang], 黃美金 [Lillian M. Huang], & 何大安 [Dah-an Ho] (eds.), 百川匯海李壬癸先生七秩壽慶論文集/Streams converting into an ocean: Festschrift in honor of Professor Paul Jen-Kuei Li on his 70th birthday (《語言暨語言學》專刊外編之五/Language and Linguistics Monograph Series W5). Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica. 521–563.
    連結:
  44. Rudin, Catherine, Christina Kramer, Loren Billings, & Matthew Baerman. 1999. Macedonian and Bulgarian li questions: Beyond syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17. 541–86.
    連結:
  45. Sadock, Jerrold. 1991. Autolexical syntax: A theory of parallel grammatical representations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    連結:
  46. Schachter, Paul, & Fe T. Otanes. 1972. Tagalog reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    連結:
  47. Steele, Susan. 1977. “Clisis and diachrony.” In Charles N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change. Austin: University of Texas Press. 539–579.
    連結:
  48. Steele, Susan. 1981. “Equivalence.” In Susan Steele, Adrian Akmajian, Richard Demers, Eloise Jelinek, Chisato Kitagawa, Richard Oehrle, & Thomas Wasow. An encyclopedia of AUX: A study in cross-linguistic equivalence (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 5). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 141–167.
    連結:
  49. Thomas, David. 1955. Three analyses of the Ilocano pronoun system. Word 11(2). 204–208.
    連結:
  50. Thompson, Chad. 1994. “Passives and inverse constructions.” In T[almy] Givón (ed.), Voice and inversion (Typological Studies in Language 28). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 47–63.
    連結:
  51. Tsukida, Naomi. 2005. “Seediq”. In Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar (Routledge Language Family Series). London: Routledge. 291–325.
    連結:
  52. Wu, Hsiao-hung Iris. 2009. “Existential constructions in Isbukun Bunun.” Oceanic Linguistics 48(2). 364–378.
    連結:
  53. Zeitoun, Elizabeth, Lillian M. Huang, Marie M. Yeh, Anna H. Chang, & Joy J. Wu. 1996. “The temporal, aspectual, and modal systems of some Formosan languages: A typological perspective.” Oceanic Linguistics 35(1). 21–56.
    連結:
  54. Zeitoun, Elizabeth, & Chen-huei Wu. 2006. An overview of reduplication in Formosan languages. In 張永利 [Henry Y. Chang], 黃美金 [Lillian M. Huang], & 何大安 [Dah-an Ho] (eds.), 百川匯海李壬癸先生七秩壽慶論文集/Streams converting into an ocean: Festschrift in honor of Professor Paul Jen-Kuei Li on his 70th birthday (《語言暨語言學》專刊外編之五/Language and Linguistics Monograph Series W5). Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica. 97–142.
    連結:
  55. Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985. “Clitics and particles.” Language 61(2). 283–305.
    連結:
  56. Zwicky, Arnold M., & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1983. “Cliticization vs. inflection: English n’t.” Language 59(3). 502–513.
    連結:
  57. Anderson, Stephen R. 2000. “Towards an optimal account of second-position phenomena.” In Joost Dekkers, Frank van der Leeuw, & Jeroen van de Weijer, (eds.), Optimality theory: Phonology, syntax, and acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 302–333.
  58. Anderson, Stephen R. 2005. Aspects of the theory of clitics (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 11). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  59. Billings, Loren A. 2002. “Phrasal clitics.” Journal of Slavic Linguistics 10(1–2). 53–104.
  60. Billings, Loren A. 2008/to appear. “The relative order of personal pronouns across Greater Central Philippine: Light-first and disformation.” Presented at the 15th annual meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association, University of Sydney, Australia; to be uploaded to the Rutgers Optimality Archive.
  61. Billings, Loren A. To appear. “Maranao, voice, and diathesis.” To appear in Loren Billings, & Nelleke Goudswaard (eds.), Piakandatu ami Dr. Howard P. McKaughan. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines and Summer Institute of Linguistics. 30–35.
  62. Billings, Loren, & Daniel Kaufman. 2004. “Towards a typology of Austronesian pronominal clisis.” In Paul Law (ed.), Proceedings of AFLA 11 (ZAS Papers in Linguistics 34). Berlin: Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft. 15–29.
  63. Billings, Loren, & Abigail Konopasky. 2002. “The role of morphology in the ordering of verb-adjacent clitics: From syntax to prosody in Bulgarian and Tagalog.” In Artemis Alexiadou, Susann Fischer, & Melita Stavrou (eds.), Papers from the workshop Language Change from a Generative Perspective, Thessaloniki, Feb. 2002 (Linguistics in Potsdam 19). Potsdam: Institut für Linguistik, Universität Potsdam. 1–26.
  64. Bloomfield, Leonard. 1917. Grammatical analysis: Tagalog texts with grammatical analysis 2 (Studies in Language and Literature 3.3). Urbana: University of Illinois.
  65. Browne, Wayles. 1975/2004. “Serbo-Croatian enclitics for English-speaking learners.” In Rudolf Filipović (ed.), Contrasive analysis of English and Serbo-Croatian. Zagreb: Institute of Linguistics (republished in Journal of Slavic linguistics 12(1–2), 249–283).
  66. [Bunen Group] 布嫩语小组. 1988. “布嫩语概况 [An introduction of Bunun].” In中央民族学院少数民族语言文学三系高山族语言文学教研室 [Formosan Languages and Literature Section, Department of Minority Languages and Literatures, Minzu University of China] (ed.), 高山族语言文学 [Formosan languages and literature]. 北京 [Beijing]: 中央民族学院 [Minzu University of China]. 43–68.
  67. Carstairs, Andrew. 1981. Notes on affixes, clitics, and paradigms. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
  68. Chang, Yung-Li. 1997. Voice, case, and agreement in Seediq and Kavalan. Hsinchu, Taiwan: National Tsing Hua University PhD dissertation.
  69. [Chang, Yung-Li] 張永利. 2000. 賽德克語參考語法 [Reference grammar of Seediq] (台灣南島語言第六冊 [Formosan Languages Series 6]). 臺北 [Taipei]: 遠流 [Yuanliou].
  70. Chang, Yung-Li. 2006. “The guest playing host: Adverbial modifiers as matrix verbs in Kavalan.” In Hans-Martin Gärtner, Paul S., & Joachim Sabel (eds.), Clause structure and adjuncts in Austronesian languages (Studies in Generative Grammar 87). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  71. Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  72. De Busser, Rik. 2009a. “Doing things together in Takivatan Bunun.” 南島語「並列」及「伴同」結構小型研討會論文集/Proceedings of the workshop on coordination and comitativity in Austronesian languages. 台北 [Taipei]: 中央研究院語言學研究所語言類型學研究室 [Language Typology Research Group, Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica]. 249–260.
  73. De Busser, Rik. 2009b. Towards a grammar of Takivatan Bunun: Selected topics. Bundoora, Victoria, Australia: La Trobe University PhD dissertation.
  74. Dubois [DuBois], Carl D. 1976. Sarangani Manobo: An introductory guide (Special Monograph Issues of the Philippine Journal of Linguistics 6). Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines. 46–51.
  75. Embick, David, & Rolf Noyer. 1999. “Locality in post-syntactic operations.” In Vivian Lin, Cornelia Krause, Benjamin Bruening, & Karlos Arregi (eds.), Papers on morphology and syntax, cycle two (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 34). Cambridge, MA: MIT press. 265–317.
  76. Hale, Kenneth. 1973. “Person marking in Walbiri.” In Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. 308–344.
  77. Halpern, Aaron L. 1992/1995. On the placement and morphology of clitics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications (revision of Topics in the placement and morphology of clitics. Stanford: Stanford University PhD dissertation).
  78. Harmon, Carol W. 1977. Kagayanen and the Manobo subgroup of Philippine languages. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa PhD dissertation.
  79. [He, Ru-fen] 何汝芬, 曾思奇 [Zeng Si-qi], 李文苏 [Li Wen-shu], & 林青春 [Lin Qing-chun]. 1986. 高山族语言简志 (布嫩语) [An outline of the Formosan native languages (Bunun)] (中国少数民族语言简志丛书 [Series on Minority Languages in China]). 北京 [Beijing]: 民族 [Minzu].
  80. Heap, David. 2005. “Constraining optimality: Clitic sequences and feature geometry.” In Lorie Heggie & Francisco Ordóñez (eds.), Clitic and affix combinations: Theoretical perspectives (Linguistik Aktuell 74). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 81–102.
  81. Heggie, Lorie, & Francisco Ordóñez. 2005. “Clitic ordering phenomena.” In Lorie Heggie & Francisco Ordóñez (eds.), Clitic and affix combinations: Theoretical perspectives (Linguistik Aktuell 74). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 1–29.
  82. [Huang, Lillian M.] 黃美金. 1997. “高雄縣的布農語 [Bunun in Kaohsiung County].” In 李壬癸 [Paul Jen-kuei Li] (ed.), 高雄縣南島語言 [The Austronesian languages of Kaohsiung County] (高雄縣文獻叢書系列第七冊 [Kaohsiung Monograph Series 7]). 高雄 [Kaohsiung]: 高雄縣政府 [Government of Kaohsiung County]. 351–409.
  83. Hung, Silvia Yu-ju, & Loren Billings. 2009/2010. “Topicality and pronominal ordering in two Manobo languages.” Presented at the 11th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Aussois, France (also appeared in Rutgers Optimality Archive ).
  84. Klavans, Judith L. 1980/1982/1995. On clitics and cliticization: The interaction of morphology, phonology, and syntax. New York: Garland (revision of Some problems in a theory of clitics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club, itself a revision of Approaches to a universal theory of clitics, London: University College London PhD dissertation).
  85. Lee, Amy Pei-jung. 1997. The case-marking and focus systems in Kavalan. Hsinchu, Taiwan: National Tsing Hua University MA thesis.
  86. Lee, Celeste Chia-Yen. 2004. The ordering of clitic pronouns in the languages of southeast Mindanao. Shalu, Taichung County, Taiwan: Providence University MA thesis.
  87. Lee, Celeste [Chia-Yen], & Loren Billings. 2008. “Clitic-pronoun clusters in Central Philippine.” In Wilaiwan Khanittanan & Paul Sidwell (eds.), SEALSXIV: Papers from the 14th meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistic Society (2004), vol. 1 (Pacific Linguistics E–5). Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University. 193–203.
  88. Lee, Celeste Ho-ling, & Lilian Li-ying Li. 2009. “Pronominal ordering in Bunun dialects.” Presented at the 11th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Aussois, France.
  89. [Li, Paul Jen-kuei] 李壬癸. 1997a. “南投縣信義鄉的布農南部方言 [Southern Bunun of Hsinyi Township, Nantou County].” In his 高雄縣南島語言 [The Austronesian Languages of Kaohsiung County] (高雄縣文獻叢書系列第七冊 [Kaohsiung Monograph Series 7]). 高雄 [Kaohsiung]: 高雄縣政府 [Government of Kaohsiung County]. 300–350.
  90. [Liao, Ying-chu] 廖英助. 1990a. “寫給家人的信 [Letter to my family].” 中央研究院民族學研究所資料彙編 [Field Materials, Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica] 3. 73–162.
  91. [Liao, Ying-chu] 廖英助. 1990b. “關於yumin piray與yabu ulay叔姪的和諧關係 [About the harmonious uncle-nephew relationship of yumin piray and yabu ulay].” 中央研究院民族學研究所資料彙編 [Field Materials, Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica] 1. 1–39.
  92. Lin, Hsiu-hsu. 1995. “Syllable structure of Bunun: evidence from Tumpu Isbukun.” In Paul Jen-kuei Li & Ying-chin Lin (eds.), Proceedings from the First Symposium of Native Austronesian Languages on Taiwan. Taipei: Committee on Research and Education Development, Ministry of Education. 333–346.
  93. Lin, Hsiu-hsu. 1996. Isbukun phonology: A study of its segments, syllable structure and phonological processes. Hsinchu, Taiwan: National Tsing Hua University MA thesis.
  94. [Lin, Tai/Dahu Ismahasan] 林太, 李文甦 [Wen-shu Li], & 林聖賢 [Bukun Ismahasan]. 1998. 走過時空的月亮/Dainasbae tus’a tu buan [The moon walks through space-time] (台灣原住民系列27 [Taiwan Aborigines Series 27]). 臺中 [Taichung]: 晨星 [Morning Star].
  95. Marron, Leonard J./周重德. 1999. 布農字典/Bunun to batasan/Bunun dictionary: Taki Banwadh-Taki Vatan. 臺中 [Taichung]: 瑪利諾會館 [Maryknoll Taiwan].
  96. Nojima, Motoyasu. 1995. “ブヌン語の voice [Voice in Bunun].” Tokyo University Linguistic Papers (TULIP) 14. 743–758.
  97. Nojima, Motoyasu. 1996. “Lexical prefixes of Bunun verbs.” In 言語研究/Gengo Kenkyu [Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan] 110. 1–27.
  98. Ochiai, Izumi. 2009. A study of Seediq pronouns. Taipei: National Taiwan University MA thesis.
  99. Oda, Kenji. 2005. “The accentuation patterns of nominal compounds in Japanese: A preliminary study.” Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 24. 203–231.
  100. [Ogawa, Naoyoshi, & Erin Asai] 小川尚義、淺井恵倫. 1935/1967. 原語による臺灣高砂族傳說集 [The myths and traditions of the Formosan native tribes (texts and notes)]. 東京 [Tōkyō]: 刀江書院 [Tōkō Shoin].
  101. Pebley, Carol Jean, & Sherri Brainard. 1999. “The functions of fronted noun phrases in Kagayanen expository discourse.” Philippine Journal of Linguistics 30(1–2). 75–121.
  102. Peng, Adam, & Loren Billings. 2008. “Binukid pronominal clisis.” In Sue McQuay (ed.), 10-ICAL pronoun papers (Studies in Philippine Languages and Cultures 17). Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines and Summer Institute of Linguistics. 179–212.
  103. Perlmutter, David. 1968/1971. Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston (revision of Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD dissertation.
  104. Prince, Alan. 2002/2003. “Arguing optimality.” In Andries Coetzee, Angela Carpenter, & Paul de Lacy (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory II (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 26). Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association. 269–304 (originally appeared in the Rutgers Optimality Archive ).
  105. Prince, Alan, & Paul Smolensky. 1993/2004. “Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar.” Technical Report, Rutgers University and University of Colorado at Boulder. 1–243 (republished as Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.)
  106. Quakenbush, J. Stephen. 2003. “Philippine linguistics from an SIL perspective: Trends and prospects.” Philippine Journal of Linguistics 34(1). 1–27.
  107. Quakenbush, J. Stephen, & Edward Ruch. 2008. “Pronoun ordering and marking in Kalamianic.” In Sue McQuay (ed.), 10-ICAL pronoun papers (Studies in Philippine Languages and Cultures 17). Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines and Summer Institute of Linguistics. 213–234.
  108. Rau, Der-Hwa Victoria. 1992. A grammar of Atayal. Taipei: Crane (same version of A grammar of Atayal. Ithaca: Cornell University PhD dissertation).
  109. Schachter, Paul. 1973/1974. “Constraints on clitic order in Tagalog.” In Andrew B. Gonzalez (ed.), Parangal kay Cecilio Lopez: Essays in honor of Cecilio Lopez on his seventy-fifth birthday (Philippine Journal of Linguistics, Special Monograph Issue 4). Quezon City: Linguistic Society of the Philippines. 214–231 (republished in UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 5. 96–118).
  110. Shi, Chaokai. 2009. The linker tu in Isbukun Bunun. Kaohsiung, Taiwan: National Kaohsiung Normal University MA thesis.
  111. Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  112. Smith, Ian, & Steve Johnson. 1985. “The syntax of clitic cross-referencing pronouns in Kugu Nganhcara.” Anthropological Linguistics 27(1). 102–111.
  113. Smith, Ian, & Steve Johnson. 2000. Kugu Nganhcara. In R. M. W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds.), Grammatical sketches of Bunuba, Ndjébbana and Kugu Nganhcara (The Handbook of Australian Languages 5). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 357–488.
  114. Starosta, Stanley. 1988. “A grammatical typology of Formosan languages.” Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 59(2). 541–576.
  115. Steele, Susan. 1975. “On some factors that affect and effect word order.” In Charles N. Li (ed.), Word order and word order change. Austin: University of Texas Press. 197–268.
  116. [Tseng, Temi Nawi C.] 曾瑞琳. 2009. 賽德克族口述傳統文化故事/Kali pnsltudan rudan [Oral accounts of stories about traditional cultures in Seediq] , vol. 1 (本土文化叢書 [Aboriginal Culture Series]). 埔里 [Puli]: 普羅文化出版廣告事業 [Pro Publishing & Advertising].
  117. Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  118. Wackernagel, Jacob. 1892/1953. “Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung.” Indogermanischen Forschungen 1. 333–436 (republished in his Kleine Schriften, vol 1. Göttingen: Vanderkoeck & Ruprecht. 11–104).
  119. Wu, Chun-ming. 2006. “Adverbials in Paiwan.” Presented at the 10th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics; Puerto Princesa City, Palawan, Philippines. Available at
  120. [Yeh, Marie M.] 葉美利. 2000. “布農語與賽夏語的重疊結構 [Reduplication in Bunun and Saisiyat].” 台灣人文第五號 [Taiwan Humanity No. 5]. 臺北 [Taipei]: 臺灣師範大學 [Taiwan Normal University]. 359–384.
  121. [Zeitoun, Elizabeth] 齊莉莎. 2000. 布農語參考語法 [Reference grammar of Bunun] (台灣南島語言第五冊 [Formosan Languages Series 5]). 臺北 [Taipei]: 遠流 [Yuanliou].
  122. Zeitoun, Elizabeth. 2007. A grammar of Mantauran (Rukai) (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series A–4.2). Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
  123. [Zeng, Si-qi] 曾思奇. 1986. “试谈布嫩语词缀in/i [The affixes in/i in Bunun].” 中央民族学院学报 [Bulletin of the Central University for Nationalities] 1986(1). 89–93.
  124. [Zeng, Si-qi] 曾思奇, 林青春 [Lin Qing-chun], & 李文苏 [Li Wen-shu]. 1987. “布嫩语 [Bunun].” In 中央民族学院少数民族语言研究所 [Graduate Institute of Languages of Minorities, Minzu University of China] (ed.), 中国少数民族语言 [Languages of minorities in China]. 成都 [Chengdu]: 四川民族出版社 [Sichuan Nationalities Publishing House]. 789–801.
  125. Zwicky, Arnold M. 1977. On clitics. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Times Cited
  1. 杜璇(2011)。利用智慧型手機開發活動模式辨識系統—應用於體重過重者之體能活動量改善。成功大學醫學資訊研究所學位論文。2011。1-77。 
  2. 曾鈺婷(2011)。不同身體活動量老年人執行視覺空間注意力之認知電生理表現—以軟式網球運動為例。成功大學體育健康與休閒研究所學位論文。2011。1-86。 
  3. 陳嘉慧(2013)。第三孕期身體活動、懷孕前身體質量指數和孕期體重增加量對生產結果之影響。中山醫學大學護理學系學位論文。2013。1-93。 
  4. 黃姿菡(2015)。台灣停經婦女經期狀態和更年期症狀與自主神經活動之關係。高雄醫學大學心理學系碩士班學位論文。2015。1-75。 
  5. 張玟菱(2008)。正位心臟移植手術病患其術後身體活動度與心率變異度相關性之探討。臺北醫學大學護理學系碩士暨碩士在職專班學位論文。2008。1-90。
  6. 李麗晶(2012)。生活型態和健身運動介入對成年人身體活動行為、認知及體適能之影響。臺灣師範大學體育學系學位論文。2012。1-126。
  7. 潘倍汶(2014)。布農歌舞展演的變遷-以地利部落為例。成功大學台灣文學系學位論文。2014。1-167。
  8. 蘇淑貞(2016)。執行經皮冠狀動脈介入治療的中年男性患者之運動健康信念與身體活動之相關性。長榮大學護理學研究所學位論文。2016。1-53。
  9. 邱玄罃(2017)。雲端身體活動社群網路對女高中生身體活動之影響。成功大學教育研究所學位論文。2017。1-99。
  10. 郭麗芬(2017)。臨床輪班護理人員身體活動與睡眠品質相關性探討。長榮大學護理學研究所學位論文。2017。1-108。