Title

防洪系統溢堤風險分析模式之研究

Translated Titles

Study on Risk Analysis of Overbank in Flood Control System

Authors

康富智

Key Words

溢堤 ; 風險分析 ; Overbank ; Risk Analysis

PublicationName

成功大學水利及海洋工程學系碩士在職專班學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2007年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

紀雲曜;謝正倫

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

中文摘要 多數防洪系統的規劃與設計,都是在未充分利用資料下完成,常常面臨水文資料的缺乏、水文紀錄年限的不足,再加上變數的不確定性等問題,使得決策往往必須在不確定的條件下完成,一般河川存有水文、地文等不確定性因子,傳統規劃將不確定因子取定值演算,以出水高來涵蓋各種不確定性,但卻無法量化風險值,有鑑於此,如何考慮存在的不確定性,定量評估防洪設施之風險,乃為現今災害防治重要的工作之一。 本研究以曾文溪為例,以Hasofer-Lind二次矩可靠度指標分析方法為基礎,應用EXCEL的「規劃求解」工具,考量諸水文、地文因子的不確性,建立溢堤風險分析模式,利用所發展的風險量化評估方法,進行防洪設施溢堤風險評估,並對未來自然力變異對溢堤風險之影響予以量化,以提供防洪設施規劃設計及決策之參考。本研究建立之模式可於河川規劃時推算防洪系統在不確定因子下之溢堤風險值,再依討論之容許風險值決定河寬及堤防高程之計畫值。

English Abstract

ABSTRACT Most designs and planning of flood control system are constructed under inadequately used data. Thus, the lack of hydrology data, insufficient time of hydrology record and other uncertain factors push decision making completed under unsure conditions. In general rivers contain uncertainly hydrologic and geomorphic factors. As a result, traditional planning makes calculation by taking fixed value estimate from uncertain factors, using free board to cover all kinds of uncertainty, but unable to quantify risks. As a consequence, it is an important effort to consider the existence of uncertainty and to quantify the risks of flood control facility in contemporary hazard mitigation. This research, using Zengwun River as an example, is based on the Hasofer-Lind’s analysis of second moment reliability index method, and uses “solver tool” in EXCEL program. In order to consider the uncertainty of hydrologic and geomorphic factors, we establish an analytical model of overbank risks, and use the developed quantified risk method to estimate the failure probability by overbank for flood control facility. In addition, we provide reference to assist decision making and planning of flood control facility by quantify the effect of overbank probability from natural power variations. The model established in this research can approximate the value of overbank risks in flood control system under uncertain factors. Then we can decide the planning value of river width and bank elevation from tolerable probability values.

Topic Category 工學院 > 水利及海洋工程學系碩士在職專班
工程學 > 水利工程
Reference
  1. Ang, A. H-S. and Tang, W. H. “Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design”, Vol.Ⅰ, Basic Principles, 1975. Vol. II, Decision Risk and Reliability, John Wiley, 1984.
    連結:
  2. Arthur, J. A., William, W-G. Y., and Warren, A. H., “Use of Monte Carlo Techniques in the Design and Operation of a Multipurpose Reservoir System”, Water Resources Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, Aug., 1971.
    連結:
  3. Chowdhury, R. N. and Xu, D. W., Geotechnical System Reliability of Slopes, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 47: 141-151, 1995.
    連結:
  4. Fell, R., “Landslide Risk Assessment and Allowable Risk”, Can. Geotech. J., 31(1), pp. 261-272, 1994.
    連結:
  5. Low, B. K., and Tang, W. H., “Probabilistic Slope Analysis Using Janbu's Generalized Procedure of Slices”, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 121-142, 1997.
    連結:
  6. McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., and Conover, W. J., “A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code”, Technometrics, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 239-245, 1979.
    連結:
  7. Melching, C. S., and Sharath Anmangandla, “Improved First-Order Uncertainty Method for Water-Quality Modeling”, Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 118, No. 5, pp. 791-805, 1992.
    連結:
  8. Rackwitz, R. and Fiessler, B., “Structural Reliability under Combined Random Load Sequence”, Computers and Structures, Vol. 9, 1978.
    連結:
  9. Rahman, M. K., “Applied Probability and Stochastic Process”, In Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Florida.
    連結:
  10. Shinozuka, M., “Basic Analysis of Structural Safety”, Journal of Structural division, 109(3), 1983.
    連結:
  11. Tung, Y. K., and Mays, L. W., “Risk Models for Flood Levee Design”, Water Resources Research, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 833-841, Aug., 1981.
    連結:
  12. Whitman, R. V., “Organizing and Evaluating Uncertainty in Geotechnical Engineering”, J. Geotech. and Geoenvironment Engrg., ASCE, 125(6), pp. 583-593, 2000.
    連結:
  13. Wood, E. F., “Bayesian Approach to Analyzing Uncertainty among Flood Frequency Models”, Water Resources Research, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 839-843, 1975.
    連結:
  14. 參考文獻
  15. 台灣省水利局河川治理規劃總隊,「曾文溪洪水頻率研究報告」,1974。
  16. 台灣省水利局叢刊之九十五,「曾文溪現有堤防安全檢討及加高加強計劃報告」,64年。
  17. 台灣省水利局,「曾文水庫操作運轉對下游流域影響之研究」,74年2月。
  18. 台灣省水利局,「台灣水文資料電腦檔應用之研究(11)全省各流域代表之無因次單位歷線推求」,81年。
  19. 杜俊明,河堤溢流風險之解析,成功大學水利及海洋工程研究所碩士論文,1998。
  20. 吳國儒,堤防溢流風險分析,成功大學水利及海洋工程研究所碩士論文,1991。
  21. 紀雲曜、李雅芬、李德河 , 應用最小可靠度指標於邊坡滑動面之研究,2006岩盤工程研討會論文集,289-298。
  22. 黃翰林,河堤溢流之風險可靠度分析,成功大學水利及海洋工程研究所碩士論文,1996。
  23. 黃志元,壩堤洪水溢流之風險及不確定性分析,成功大學水利及海洋工程研究所碩士論文,1990。
  24. 陳信彰,分佈型降雨-逕流模式之不確定性與敏感度分析,成功大學水利及海洋工程研究所碩士論文,1996。
  25. 葉光毅,計畫方法論進階,新文京出版,第4章,第67-94頁,2003。
  26. 楊錦釧、湯有光,水文模式不定性分析報告及其在水工結構之可靠度研究(一),行政院農業委員會計劃報告,農委會81農建-12.2-林-05(07),1992年6月。
  27. 經濟部水利處水利規劃試驗所,「曾文溪水系治理規劃報告」,83年12月。
  28. 經濟部水利處水利規劃試驗所,曾文溪水文水理分析檢討(稿) ,90年3月。
  29. 經濟部水利署第六河川局,「曾文溪本流(河口至曾文溪二橋)河川區域畫設水文分析報告」,93年12月。
  30. 經濟部水利署第六河川局,「曾文溪治理、區域排水及都市計畫之整體排洪關係」,95年1月。
  31. 經濟部水利署第六河川局,「曾文溪及支流菜寮溪大斷面測量計畫」成果報告書,95年。
  32. 蕭慶章,實用河川工程(上)河川工程規劃,財團法人成大水利海洋研究發展文教基金會,2003.11。
  33. Ang, A. H-S and C. A. Cornell “Reliability Bases of Structure Safety and Design”, Journal of the Structure Division, ASCE, Vol. 100, No. 9, pp. 1755-1769, 1974.
  34. Borgman, L. E., “Risk Criteria”, Journal of Waterways and Harbors Division, ASCE, Vol. 89, No. WW3, pp. 1-35, August 1963.
  35. Bras, R. L., “Hydraulic and Hydrologic Uncertainty: Two Aspects of Reliability”, ASCE Fall Convention. Atlanta, Georgia, October, 22-26, 1979.
  36. Chow, V. T., “Open-Channel Hydraulics”, McGraw Hill, New York, 1959.
  37. Cornell, C. A., “Structural Safety Specifications Based on Second-Moment Reliability Analysis”, Final Report of the IABSE Symposium on Concepts of Safety of Sturctures and Methods of Design, London, 1969.
  38. Hasofer, A. M and Lind, N. C., “Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 100, No. EMI, pp. 111-121, Feb., 1974.
  39. Low, B. K., Gilbert, R. B., and Wright, S. G., “Slope Reliability Using Generalized Method of Slices”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 124, No. 4, pp. 350-362, 1998.
  40. McKay, M. D., “Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis Using a Statistical Sample of Input Values”, Uncertainty Analysis, ed. By Ronen, Y., CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, pp. 145-186, 1988.
  41. Rackwitz, R. “Practical Probablistic Approach to Design”, Bulletin 112, Comite European du Beton, Paris, France 1976.
  42. Warner, R. F. and Kabaila, A. P., “Monte Carlo Study of Structural Safety”, Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 94, No. ST 12, pp. 2847-2859, 1968.
  43. Yen, B. C., and Tang, W. H., “Risk-Safety Factor Relation for Storm Sewer Design”, J. of Environmental Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 102, No. EE2, pp. 509-516, April 1976.
Times Cited
  1. 顧雲(2013)。河川堤岸風險評估分析-以高屏溪為例。臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所學位論文。2013。1-130。 
  2. 江志鵬(2011)。集水區定量降水估計誤差對於水位模擬影響之研究。臺北科技大學土木與防災研究所學位論文。2011。1-105。