透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.238.198.167
  • 學位論文

中產階級購屋後與生活品質影響之研究-以台中市為例

The Research of the influence to Lives Quality and After the Middle Class Buys the House, In Taichung City

指導教授 : 李明榮
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究以現居住台中市(含縣市合併前之原台中縣居民)之中產階級為研究對象。對象均基於自願之立意取樣的方式,透過問卷參與協助完成研究分析,共回收476份問卷,其中填寫不完整之作廢問卷44份,職業為學生不計入者31份,共計有效問卷樣本401份。經以SPSS17.0版之套裝軟體程式進行相關統計分析,進行資料處理,研究結果發現研究對象購屋之前與購屋之後生活品質比較: 1.就性別而言,在「生理範疇」,男性購屋之後的分數顯著低於購屋之前;在「社會範疇」,女性達到顯著差異,女性購屋之後的分數顯著高於購屋之前;在「環境範疇」,男性與女性皆達到顯著差異,男性與女性購屋之後的分數均顯著高於購屋之前。 2.就年齡而言,在「生理範疇」54歲以上的受訪者購屋之後的分數顯著低於購屋之前;在「心理範疇」,18-26歲與36-44歲的受訪者購屋之後的分數均顯著高於購屋之前;在「社會範疇」, 36-44歲的受訪者購屋之後的分數顯著高於購屋之前;在「環境範疇」, 18-26歲與36-44歲的受訪者購屋之後的分數均顯著高於購屋之前。 3.就教育程度而言,「生理範疇」,教育程度為高中職以下的受訪者,購屋之後的分數顯著低於購屋之前;「心理範疇」,教育程度為大專/大學的受訪者購屋之後的分數顯著高於購屋之前;「環境範疇」,教育程度為高中職以下與大專/大學的受訪者購屋之後的分數均顯著高於購屋之前。 4.就職業而言,「生理範疇」,職業為無/退休/家管的受訪者購屋之後的分數顯著低於購屋之前;「心理範疇」,職業為軍公教的受訪者購屋之後的分數顯著高於購屋之前;「社會範疇」,其他職業的受訪者購屋之後的分數顯著高於購屋之前;「環境範疇」,職業為軍公教與商業行為的受訪者購屋之後的分數均顯著高於購屋之前。 5.就家庭年收入,「生理範疇」與「心理範疇」,家庭年收入為40萬以下的受訪者購屋之後的分數顯著低於購屋之前;「社會範疇」與「環境範疇」,家庭年收入為86-120萬的受訪者購屋之後的分數顯著高於購屋之前。 就已購年份而言,「生理範疇」、「社會範疇」與「環境範疇」,受訪者購屋之後的分數顯著低於購屋之前。

關鍵字

中產階級 購屋 生活品質

並列摘要


The research takes the middle class living in the Taichung city (including residents living in Taichung county before merging city and county) as the research objects. The research objects are voluntary and the way is purposive sampling through articipating in replying questionnaires to finish the research analysis and there are total 476 sets of questionnaires; 44 sets of questionnaires are not filled in completely; the research objects whose students are 31 sets and these are not included. Total 401 sets are valid questionnaires, and use the version of SPSS17.0 software package to implement the related statistical analysis and data processing, the research result finds that comparison of research objects living quality between before and after buying house. 1.In terms of gender, in the physical domain, the score that after male bought houses is lower than before they buying houses, the difference between female is significant; the score that after female bought houses is higher than before they buying houses; in terms of environment, the male and female also have obvious difference, the score that after male and female bought houses is higher than before they buying houses. 2.In terms of age, in the physical domain, the score that after respondents aging above 54 bought houses is significantly lower than before they buying houses; in the psychological domain, the score that after respondent aging between 18-26 and aging between 36-44 bought houses is clearly higher than before they buying houses; in the society domain, the score that after respondents aging between 36-44 is higher than before they buying houses; in the environment domain, the scores that after the respondents aging between 18-26 and aging between 36-44 bought houses is markedly higher than before they buying houses. 3.In terms of education degree, the physical domain, the score after the respondents whose education degree is under senior high (vocational) school bought houses is significantly lower than before they buying houses; in the psychological domain, the scores that after the respondents whose education degree are college/university bought houses is higher than before they buying houses; in the environment domain, the scores that after the respondents who graduated under senior high (vocational) school and the respondents who graduated from college/university is higher than before they buying houses. 4.In terms of job, the physical domain, the score that after the respondents who are jobless/retired/housewife bought houses is lower than before they buying houses; in the psychological domain, the scores that after the respondents who work for army or government is higher than before they buying houses; environment domain, the scores that after the respondents who work for army or government and the respondents who work related to business bought houses is significantly higher than before they buying houses. 5.In terms of family annual income, the physical and psychological domains, the score that after the respondents whose family annual income lower than four hundred thousand bought houses is lower than before they buying houses; in the society domain and environment domain, the scores that after the respondents whose family annual income is between eight hundred sixty thousand and one million two hundred thousand bought houses is significantly higher than before they buying houses. 6.In terms of purchased years, the physical domain, society domain and environment domain, the scores that after the respondents bought houses is significantly lower than before they buying houses.

並列關鍵字

middle class purchase house living quality

參考文獻


Laforge,R.G.,Rossi,J.S.,Prochaska,J.O.,Velicer,W.F.,Levesque,D.A.,& McHorney,C.A. (1999), Stage of regular exercise and health-related quality of life.Preventive Medicine,28.
簡啟文,王榮德,姚開屏,李勤岸,謝清麟:世界衛生組織生活品質問卷中量尺語詞之選擇。台灣醫學 2005;9:584-94。
姚開屏(2000)台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展簡介。中華公共衛生雜誌,19卷4期。
吳秋燕(2003)老人身體活動、心肺適能與生活品質之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學碩士論文。
Gerhard Hirschfeld(1987), The People:Growth and Survival.

延伸閱讀