喜馬拉雅條款之研究-兼論中國大陸港口經營人之責任規範

Study of Himalaya Clause – including Mainland China Port Operator's Accountability Norm

吳豐竹(Feng-Chu Wu)

指導教授 ： 蔡英欣

國立臺灣大學/法律學院/法律學研究所/碩士(2015年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.10915

摘要

無資料

關鍵字

喜馬拉雅條款 ； 海上運送人責任 ； 履行輔助人 ； 港口經營人 ； 運送人免責與責任限制

並列摘要

Abstract
English common law adopts strict liability as the basis of liabilities of marine cargo carrier. After carrier's obligation to pay careful attention to vessel seaworthiness has been changed as stipulated in Hague Rules, the carrier can claim limitation and exemption of his liabilities. Meanwhile, whether subordinated performance assistant of the carrier could set up the plea by citing limitation and exemption of carrier's liabilities was confirmed after the court judgment in the case of England
Himalaya vessel.

Afterwards, such a regulation was referred to international convention such as Hague-Visby Rules, etc. including every carrier's domestic laws. Taiwan incorporated this clause in Article 76 of Maritime Act after amendment in 1999. Again, whether independent performance assistant could cite the cause for the limitation and exemption of carrier's liabilities has been regulated since Hamburg Rules. Himalaya clause is still difference between that expressly stated in Taiwan's Maritime Act and that used in international convention. The former limited the clause to those independent performance assistants who only can cite the limitation and exemption of carrier's liabilities in commercial port area. This article discussed Himalaya clause mixed with international and every country's law, including the relevant regulations for Mainland China port operator.

並列關鍵字

Himalaya clause ； Liabilities of marine cargo carrier ； Performance assistants ； port operator

參考文獻

葉啟洲，喜馬拉雅條款與獨立承攬人責任－評最高法院98年度台上字第1329號判決，月旦法學雜誌，第60卷，2011年。

張志清、林妲欣，由鹿特丹規則論我國海商法貨物運送修正之方向，航運季刊，第21卷第4期，2012年。

林群弼，海商法論，三民，2011年1月2版。

邱展發，海運提單實務，財團法人長榮發基金會，初版，2009年。

張新平，承攬運送人之責任－最高法院98年度台上字第31號民事判決評析，法令月刊，第61卷，第3期，2010年。