透過您的圖書館登入
IP:44.195.47.227
  • 學位論文

聯合社區建構效應之社會網絡分析-以桃園縣龍潭社區為例

United community construct the effect of Social Network Analysis - A Case Study of Taoyuan County Longtan community

指導教授 : 陳欽春 周錦宏
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


旗艦社區領航計畫是桃園縣政府提出,希望透過聯合社區的概念,以母雞帶小雞的模式,達到資源共享、相互學習,促進社區整體發展。自從此計畫施行以來,社區之間的互動增加,透過領導的方式,帶領其他社區的發展也提升社區自我學習的機會,讓社區在互動過程中,能夠有更多之機會參與其他的社區活動,加強自我社區所缺乏的部分。而社區發展協會可以藉由社區之連結,資源之相互交換,促進社區社會資本之提升,也能向相關單位申請較多之經費。 然而,一直以來,社區發展協會面臨最大的問題就是人力的缺乏;且社區發展協會的運作範圍常與村里長的行政管轄相互重疊,當牽扯上政治因素時,便導致社區發展協會與村里辦公室的資源無法相結合。另外,在本位主義的影響下,社區發展協會間的互動關係並不高,社區成員並未因聯合社區的成立,促進與其他社區成員的夥伴關係。而政府單位雖作為政策的輔導對象,卻未與社區有良好之互動有關係;相對地,行政程序上的阻礙,導致社區在執行作業上的絆腳石,增加社區執行上之困擾。雖然大部分的成員認為旗艦社區領航計畫可以帶動社區的發展,促進社區的學習,將整體的效益達到1+1<2的效果,但在實際的運作上與認知是截然不同的。

並列摘要


Flagship community navigational program is made by the Taoyuan County Government. By the concept of united community to share resources and learn from each other that can promote the overall development of the community. Since the implementation of this program, increase interaction between the communities. Led the development of other communities and enhance self-learning opportunity for the community and have more opportunities to participate in other community activities that can strengthen its lacks of part. Community development association through communities linking, resources exchanging that promote the social capital of community, also can apply for more of the funds to the relevant units. However, all along, the biggest problem of community development association is lack of manpower. Overlap the administrative jurisdiction of the community development association and the village chief, and involved with the political factors leading to the resources of the community development association and the village office can not be combined. In addition, affected by the community’s selfish departmentalism, it has not better interactiving relationship between communitise. The members not promote partnerships with other members by establishment of the united community. Government agencies as policy guidance, has not better interactive relationship with the community. Oppositely, Obstacles on the administrative procedure, become a stumbling stone in the implementation of operations, and increase the troubles in the implementation of the communities.Although most members to think the flagship community navigational program can promote community development and enfance community learning, to be up to 1+1<2 of the overall benefits. However, the actual operation is totally different with cognition.

參考文獻


邱玉環(2012)。客家社區參與農村再生計畫之協力治理:以南投縣國姓鄉南港社區為例。國立暨南國際大學公共行政與政策學系碩士論文,南投縣。
Burt, R. S.(2001).‘Structural holes versus network closure as social capital.’ In Lin.N., Cook, K., and Burt, R. S. (Eds.), Social Capital: Theory and Research (pp.31-56). New York: Walter de Gruyter.Cheng.
周玉堡(2010)。非營利組織推動客家社區營造之研究—以東勢庄文化協會為例。國立中央大學客家研究碩士在職專班碩士論文,桃園縣。
彭成億(2011)。客語生活學校與社區組織協力治理之研究-以桃園縣中平國小布馬陣活動為例。國立中央大學客家研究碩士在職專班碩士論文,桃園縣。
萬智宇(2009)。客家族群社區參與之研究—以南桃園地區社區發展協會為例。國立中央大學客家政治經濟研究所碩士論文,桃園縣。

被引用紀錄


吳虹文(2014)。客家商圈公私協力運作之研究-以龍潭鄉龍元宮商圈為例〔碩士論文,國立中央大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0031-0412201512014664
傅淑宜(2015)。客家社區培力與環境教育推動之研究 -以龍潭三和社區為例〔碩士論文,國立中央大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0031-0412201512064044

延伸閱讀