《甲骨文合集》辨偽舉例

A List of Forgeries from the Oracle Bone Collection

蔡哲茂(Che-Mao Tsai)

《漢學研究》 24卷1期 (2006/06) Pp. 417-441

摘要

本文提出收錄在《甲骨文合集》中，十三片甲骨中有偽刻的嫌疑，第一片合6882從《百年學府聚珍－西北大學歷史博物館藏品集》的照片可明確看出，第二片合27110抄自合27111，第三片合15544抄自合15543，第四片合15822抄自合15821，第五片27199正由字跡可知早期偽刻，第六片合35311由筆勢刻款可知偽刻，第七片合41606與第八片合30045抄自合30831，第九片合10372文例字體不合，第十片合32538字體刻辭位置不合，第十一片合35273由兩字與偽刻京3922同，知其為偽，第十二片合29656乃仿自合29996，第＋三片合35312乃仿自合35314（人B2140）。

關鍵字

甲骨文 ； 辨偽 ； 甲骨文合集 ； 卜辭 ； 古文字

並列摘要

Thirteen oracle bones included in the Jiaguwen Heji甲骨文合集(Oracle Bone Collection) are shown to be probable fakes, namely:
1. Heji 6882 shows clear photographic evidence of being forged, from its reproduction in Treasures of the Museum of History-Northeast University, A Centennial Catalogue.
2. Heji 27110 is copied from Heji 27111.
3. Heji 15544 is copied from Heji 15543.
4. Heji 15822 is copied from Heji 15821.
5. Heji 27199 can be shown to be an early fake from its strokes.
6. Heji 35311 can be shown to be a fake from its style of carving.
7-8. Heji 41606 and Heji 30045 are copied from Heji 30831.
9. Heji 10372 is incoherent, both in its usage and the form of the characters.
10. Heji 32538 is incoherent in both the form and disposition of the carved characters.
11. Heji 35273 is dubious because it has two characters in common with Jing京3922, which is a known forgery.
12. Heji 29656 is a counterfeit of Heji 29996.
13. Heji 35312 is a counterfeit of Heji 35314.

並列關鍵字

oracle bones ； fakes ； Jiaguwen Heji甲骨文合集 ； oracle inscriptions ； classical characters

參考文獻

美方法斂、白瑞華(1935)。庫方二氏藏甲骨卜辭。上海:商務印書館石印本。

Hü, Chin-hsiung(1977)。The Menzies Collection of Shang Dynasty Oracle。Toronto:The Royal Ontario Museum。

甲骨文獻集成(2001)。成都:四川大學出版社。

白玉崢(1991)。中國文字。

白玉崢(1999)。殷架佚存校釋。臺北:文史哲出版社。