透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.144.197
  • 期刊

「負荷-控制-支持」與「付出-回饋失衡」工作壓力模型中文版量表之信效度檢驗:以電子產業員工為研究對象

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Demand-Control-Support Model and Effort-Reward Imbalance Model Questionnaires: a Study Among Employees of the Microelectronic Industry

摘要


目標:探討兩個工作壓力模型,即「負荷-控制-支持模型」(Demand-Control-Support Model)與「付出-回饋失衡模型」(Effort-Reward Imbalance Model)之理論基礎,並檢驗中文版量表之信效度。方法:以高科技電子業男女性員工各401及667名為研究對象,以問卷評估其社會心理面向工作特質、工作滿意度與自評健康狀態。工作特質包含工作控制、心理負荷、社會支持、外在付出、回饋、及工作過度投入。信度以Cronbach's alpha coefficients量測量表題目的內部一致性。效度則包括內容效度及建構效度。結論:除心理負荷之內部一致性較差外,其他分量表的Cronbach's alpha coefficients皆高於0.65。因素分析顯示實證資料所抽取的因素結構與理論架構吻合。結論:依兩理論模型所研發的工作壓力量表能有效的測量職場中重要的工作特質,如「工作控制」、「心理負荷」、「回饋」與「過度投入」等,有助於我們對工作壓力問題的瞭解。

並列摘要


Objective: In this study we explored the theoretical background of two alternative job stress models – the Demand-Control-Support model and the Effort-Reward Imbalance model, and examined the reliability and validity of their Chinese questionnaires. Methods: In this study, we recruited 40 I men and 667 women who were employed in high-tech microelectronic companies in Taiwan. A self-administered questionnaire was used to assess their psychosocial job characteristics, including job control, psychological demands, work-related social support, extrinsic effort, rewards, and over-commitment. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was calculated for each scale to assess the internal consistency. For validity analyses, we examined content validity and construct validity. Results: Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for most sub-scales were all above 0.65, except for the psychological demands subscale. Exploratory factor analyses extracted 4 factors that corresponded closely to the theoretical constructs of the two models. Conclusion: Our results showed that the questionnaires developed from the two models are useful tools for the assessment of some important psychosocial work characteristics, and can help shed light on our understanding of job stress problems.

參考文獻


Borg, V., Kristensen, T.(1999).Validity of scales for measurement of four core dimension of the psychosocial work environment in ten Danish studies.Work Stress and Health: Organization of Work in a Global Economy.(Work Stress and Health: Organization of Work in a Global Economy).:
Bosma, H., Peter, R., Siegrist, J., Marmot, M.(1998).Two alternative job stress models and the risk of coronary heart disease.American Journal of Public Health.88
Cooper, C. L.(2002).The changing psychological contract at work.Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.59
De Jonge, J., Bosma, H., Peter, R., Siegrist, J.(2000).Job strain, effort-reward imbalance and employee well-being: A large-scale cross-sectional study.Social Science & Medicine.50
Fenster, L., Schaefer, C., Mathur, A.(1995).Psychologic stress in the workplace and spontaneous abortion.American Journal of Epidemiology.142

被引用紀錄


洪莉婷(2016)。正向思考特質與工作壓力:以新北市國民小學人事人員為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2016.00954
孫國興(2007)。家長式領導對部屬工作態度影響之研究 —以空軍後勤單位為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2007.00407
林俊佑(2013)。工作壓力與社會支持對職業倦怠、工作滿意及生活品質之影響-以臺灣地區自殺關懷訪視員為例〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201300935
蔡佩珊(2011)。台灣地區心理師之工作壓力與健康生活品質之關係〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/CYCU.2011.00037
莊婷(2013)。在台外籍勞工之健康促進生活型態、工作壓力與心理健康〔碩士論文,中山醫學大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6834/CSMU.2013.00141

延伸閱讀