剖析台灣民眾的就醫流動：利用引力模式評估就醫距離與醫療資源分布的影響

Profiling the patient flow for seeking healthcare in Taiwan: using gravity modeling to investigate the influences of travel distance and healthcare resources

林民浩(Min-Hau Lin) ； 郭年真(Raymmond N. Kuo) ； 陳威全(Benny Wei Chien Chin) ； 溫在弘(Tzai-Hung Wen)

《台灣公共衛生雜誌》 35卷2期 (2016/04) Pp. 136-151

https://doi.org/10.6288/TJPH201635104086

摘要

目標：過去研究多以行政區或醫療分區的每萬人口醫療資源數作為評估就醫可近性之指標，但分區的概念簡化民眾就醫行為，與實際醫療利用情形有所落差。本研究將以實際就醫流動資料呈現各地區醫療可近性，並量化就醫距離與醫療資源分布對就醫流動的影響。方法：使用全民健康保險研究資料庫2010年承保抽樣歸人檔，依居住地與就醫地建立流動起迄矩陣，計算各鄉鎮市區加權就醫距離作為可近性指標，再以引力模式估計影響就醫流動的因素。結果：加權就醫距離呈現出花東與雲嘉沿海等地有較差的醫療可近性。引力模式分析顯示，就醫距離與醫療資源皆顯著影響民眾的就醫流動。然而，相較於急診與住院的就醫流動，就醫距離對於門診就醫流動影響更為明顯。但於鄰近地區的就醫權衡，醫療機構一般病床數對於急診與住院就醫流動的吸引力，更重於就醫距離的效果。結論：加權就醫距離更能客觀反映一地醫療可近性。求近是台灣民眾就醫的首要考量，但民眾急診與住院就醫，則傾向在鄰近地區中尋求硬體規模最大者。

關鍵字

引力模式 ； 病人流動 ； 就醫距離 ； 醫療資源 ； 空間分析

並列摘要

Objectives: Township-level physician-to-population and hospital bed-to-population ratios have been widely adopted as indicators of health care accessibility in Taiwan; however, these indicators cannot reflect actual healthcare-seeking behaviors of patients. Therefore, the aims of this study were to establish actual patient flow for seeking healthcare and to clarify the factors influencing preferences for seeking healthcare. Methods: We estimated the residence and collected the locations of healthcare visits for each patient from the nationwide Longitudinal Health Insurance Database in 2010 to establish an origin-destination matrix. The patient flow among townships could be conducted from the matrix. The weighted travel distance of healthcare visits was developed as a new indicator of accessibility. The gravity model was then used to analyze the patient flow and assess the influences of travel distance and healthcare resources. Results: Using the weighted travel distance, eastern Taiwan and the coastal areas of Yunlin and Chiayi were identified as the poorest accessibility for healthcare resources. The results of the gravity model showed that travel distance was the major factor correlated negatively with the volumes of outpatient and inpatient/emergency flow; however, the abundance of healthcare resources positively influenced the preference of inpatient/emergency patients from their residence to neighborhood regions for seeking healthcare. Conclusions: The weighted travel distance could properly reflect the access of healthcare. We conclude that travel distance is the major factor which influences patient flow for seeking healthcare. In contrast, people tend to choose the healthcare facilities with abundant resources for seeking inpatient/emergency healthcare.

並列關鍵字

gravity model ； patient flow ； travel distance ； health care resources ； spatial analysis

參考文獻

廖興中(2014)。台灣基層醫療缺乏區域界定之初探：整合空間與非空間因素的分析。行政暨政策學報。58，121-52。

李虹映、黃信忠、許怡欣、林文德(2014)。台灣急重症跨區就醫之變化情形：2001-2010年。台灣衛誌。33，64-74。

章殷超、溫在弘、賴美淑(2011)。比較不同地理可近性分析方法於評估台灣各鄉鎮每萬人口西醫師數之差異。台灣衛誌。30，558-72。

梁亞文、蔡哲宏、陳文意(2011)。非緊急急診病人特性及其相關因素探討。台灣衛誌。30，505-16。

林民浩、楊安琪、溫在弘(2011)。利用地區差異與人口學特徵評估全民健保資料庫人口居住地變項之推估原則。台灣衛誌。30，347-60。