跨域投資與治理－台、韓、日商中國大陸投資跨國比較

Cross-Border Investment and Governance: A Comparison of Taiwanese, Korean and Japanese Business Investment in China

陳德昇(Te-Sheng Chen)

《政治學報》 52期 (2011/12) Pp. 101-139

https://doi.org/10.6229/CPSR.2012.52.04

摘要

在經濟全球化背景下，外商投資的群眾成因及其所衍生之投資環境治理、體制創新、國際接軌，皆與地方政府跨域治理之運作相關。在投資行為運作過程中，除需考量區位選擇、經貿環境與規範、全球生產網絡連結與產業競爭力維持外，且涉及與地方政府互動、對話及折衝，期能提升生產績效，進而實現獲利之目標。本文主要研究焦點議題包括：（一）中國大陸外資吸引之不同階段，台、韓、日商在中國大陸的投資區位選擇，以及參與跨域治理過程的影響與回應；（二）不同區位發展與外商跨域治理，對體制創新與國際接軌之影響；（三）台、韓、日商「協會」之平台角色與中介組織之互動治理關係；（四）跨域治理與社會資本有關信任建構運作與效應；（五）跨域治理結構穩定性與否，與資本及產業流動之關聯性。基本上，在中共威權政治體制下，外資吸引績效彰顯，但蘇州昆山、青島城陽與大連金州跨域治理之運作，與西方民主社會下多元參與及互動仍有本質性之差異。中國大陸地方政府的運作，更多體現在經濟現實需要與外資運作的功能性考量。在現階段中共政權體制下，跨域治理既有特殊性、功能性與階段性之特質，並有廣度與深度的差異性與限制性。

關鍵字

台 ； 韓 ； 日商 ； 全球生產網絡 ； 制度創新 ； 發展型國家 ； 跨域治理

並列摘要

This article is a comparative study of Taiwanese, Japanese and Korean business investments in China within the conceptual framework of cross-border investment and governance. In the era of globalization, Taiwanese, Japanese and Korean business investments in Kunshan, Dalian and Chengyang in China aim to link up with global production networks. The driving forces of investment include lowering costs, creating a better investment environment, building up mutual trust and institutionalizing the process of exporting from these areas through negotiations with local governments. In general, if local governments are capable of cross-border governance with foreign investors, this will improve performance and help stabilize business ventures during periods of international economic challenges.This study attempts to answer the following two questions: 1)What are the types, interactions and contents of cross-border governance and participation during different periods of FDI influx in Kunshan, Chengyang and Jinzhou? 2)In different regions of economic development in China, what are the interaction of and impact on institutional innovation and international synchronization in operations involving cross-border governance? This article finds that the experiences of Kunshan, Chenyung and Jinzhou and their interaction with the local governments do not align with the concept of cross-border governance in Western democratic society. Evidence in this article also indicates that China's local governments remain authoritarian and short-sightedly utilitarian. Likewise, the adaptation in governance is only limited to the economy, market, and compliance with international rules.

並列關鍵字

cross-border governance ； developmental state ； global production network ； institution innovation ； Taiwan ； Korean and Japanese businessmen

參考文獻

柏蘭芝、潘毅(2003)。跨界治理：台資參與昆山制度創新的個案研究。城市與設計學報。15/16，59-91。

夏鑄九(2000)。全球經濟中之跨界資本─台灣電子工業之生產網絡。城市與設計學報。11/12，1-37。

耿曙、林瑞華(2007)。制度環境與協會效能：大陸台商協會的個案研究。台灣政治學刊。11(2)，93-171。

張家銘(2008)。跨界投資與中國社會適應─台商、日商與韓商比較。東亞研究。39(1)，147-162。

〈2008、2009年全區利用外資情況〉，2009，城陽區外商服務網：http://www.chengyang.gov.cn。2011/5/30。