54.167.138.53,您好!
查詢符號(半形) 查詢符號意義說明
空格 表示為「AND」兩個查詢詞之交集
雙引號("") 片語以雙引號標示開始及結束,而且只尋找出現順序相同的字詞,例:"image process"
? 表示一個字母切截,輸入兩個?表兩個字母,依此類推,例:輸入「Appl?」,查得結果應為apple, apply…(常用於英文字查詢)
* 表示不限字母切截,由0~n. 例:輸入「appl*」,查得結果應為apple, apples, apply, applied, application…(常用於英文字查詢)
AND、OR、NOT

布林邏輯組合關鍵字,用來擴大或縮小查詢範圍的技巧。
(1) AND:縮小查詢範圍
(2) OR:擴大查詢範圍 (3) NOT:排除不相關的範圍

close

DOI 是數位物件識別碼(Digital Object Identifier)的簡稱,
為物件在網路上的唯一識別碼,可用於永久連結並引用目標物件。

使用DOI作為永久連結

每個DOI號前面加上「http://dx.doi.org/」便成為永久網址。
如以DOI號為10.5297/ser.1201.002的文獻為例,此文獻的永久連結便是: http://dx.doi.org/10.5297/ser.1201.002
日後不論出版單位如何更動此文獻位置,永久連結所指向的位置皆會即時更新,不再錯失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文獻

有DOI的文獻在引用時皆應同時引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未規範DOI的引用格式,可引用DOI永久連結。

DOI可強化引用精確性、增強學術圈連結,並給予使用者跨平台的良好使用經驗,目前在全世界已有超過五千萬個物件申請DOI。如想對DOI的使用與概念有進一步了解,請參考華藝DOI註冊中心doi.airiti.com)。

關閉

ACI:

數據來源:Academic Citation Index,簡稱ACI
台灣地區最大的引用文獻資料庫,目前收錄台灣地區所出版的人文學、社會學領域學術期刊,穩定出刊中的期刊總量約400種,若包含已收錄但後續停刊的期刊,總期刊量超過500種,每年定期公布收錄期刊的影響係數(Impact Factor)等指標給大眾,並可提供專家學者免費進行學術研究使用。

影響指數(Impact Factor):某一期刊前兩年產出的論文,在統計年平均被引用的次數。
公式:(前兩年發表論文在統計年的被引用次數)÷(前兩年論文產出論文總篇數)
例如:2010年之影響係數(2011年呈現)
2009年A期刊產出論文15篇,2009年A期刊產出論文在2009年被引用20次
2008年A期刊產出論文16篇,2008年A期刊產出論文在2009年被引用30次
→2010年的影響係數=(20+30)÷(15+16)≒1.61

關閉

什麼是預刊文章?

為提供讀者最前線之學術資訊,於期刊文獻獲同意刊登後、紙本印製完成前,率先於網路線上發表之文章即為預刊文章。預刊文章尚未有卷期、頁次及出版日期資訊,但可藉由DOI號識別。DOI號是文獻的數位身份證字號,不論預刊或正式出版皆不會改變,讀者可點擊DOI連結,或於DOI號前面加上「http://dx.doi.org/」連結到文獻目前最新版本。

如何引用預刊文章?

請使用預刊文章的線上發表日期及DOI號來引用該篇文獻。

引用範例(視不同引文格式規範可能有所差異):

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名稱。YYYY/MM/DD線上預先發表。

doi:DOI號

0 個人覺得 這篇文章 推薦
中文摘要 〈TOP〉
Abstract 〈TOP〉
參考文獻(referenceCount) 〈TOP〉
  1. Aarts, J.(ed.),de Monnink, I.(ed.),Wekker, H.(ed.)(1997).Studies in English language and teaching.Amsterdam:Rodopi.
  2. Achard, M.(ed.), Niemeier, S.(ed.)(2004).Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching.New York:Mouton de Gruyter.
  3. Achard, M.(ed.),Niemeier, S.(ed.)(2004).Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching.New York:Mouton de Gruyter.
  4. Benati, A.(2001).A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense.Language Teaching Research,5,95-127.
  5. Boers, F.(2000).Enhancing metaphoric awareness in specialised reading.English for Specific Purposes,19,137-147.
  6. Cadierno, T.(1995).Formal instruction from a processing perspective: An investigation into the Spanish past tense.Modern Language Journal,79,179-93.
  7. Chan, Y.-C.(1998).Taipei, Taiwan,National Taiwan Normal University.
  8. Cheng, A.(1995).Champaign, IL,University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  9. Chu, M.,Eckblade, A.(1999).English sentence combining.Taipei, Taiwan:Crane.
  10. Clark, E.(1971).On the acquisition of the meaning of after and before.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,10,266-275.
  11. Croft, W.(2003).Typology and universals.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  12. de Garavito, J. B.(ed.),Valenzuela, E.(ed.)(2008).Selected proceedings of the 10th hispanic linguistics symposium.Somerville, MA:Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
  13. Diessel, H.(2005).Competing motivations for the ordering of main and adverbial clauses.Linguistics,43,449-470.
  14. Diessel, H.(2008).Iconicity of sequence: A corpus-based analysis of the positioning of temporal adverbial clauses in English.Cognitive Linguistics,19,465-490.
  15. Ellis, R.(1989).Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules.Studies in Second Language Acquisition,11,305-328.
  16. Farley, A.(2000).Champaign, IL,University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  17. Fredrickson, T.,Wedel, P.(1984).English by newspaper: How to read and understand an English language newspaper.Rowley, MA:Newbury House.
  18. Garett, N.(1986).The problem with grammar: What kind can the language learner use?.The Modern Language Journal,70,133-148.
  19. Greenberg, J. H.(Ed.)(1966).Universals of grammar.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  20. Haiman, J.(1983).Iconic and economic motivations.Language,59,781-819.
  21. Haiman, J.(Ed.)(1985).Iconicity in syntax: Proceedings of a symposium on iconicity in syntax.Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
  22. Haspelmath, M.(ed.),König, E.(ed.)(1995).Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective.Berlin, Germany:Mouton de Gruyter.
  23. Hawkins, J.(1994).A performance theory of order and constituency.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  24. Holme, R.(2004).Mind, metaphor and language teaching.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
  25. Jhannesson, N.-L.(ed.),Minugh, D. C.(ed.)(2008).Selected papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals.Stockholm:Stockholm University.
  26. Kortmann, B.(1991).Free adjuncts and absolutes in English. Problems of control and interpretation.London:Routledge.
  27. Krashen, S.(1981).Principles and practice in second language acquisition.Oxford, UK:Pergamon Press.
  28. Liu, Y.-H.(2009).Taipei, Taiwan,National Taiwan Normal University.
  29. Long, M. H.(1983).Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research.TESOL Quarterly,17,359-382.
  30. Marsden, E.(2006).Exploring input processing in the classroom: An experimental comparison of processing instruction and enriched input.Language Learning,56,507-566.
  31. Morenberg, M.,Sommers, J.(2008).The writer's options: Lessons in style and arrangement.New York:Pearson Longman.
  32. Morimoto, S.,Loewen, S.(2007).A comparison of the effects of image-schema-based instruction and translation-based instruction on the acquisition of L2 polysemous words.Language Teaching Research,11,347-372.
  33. Pfaff, C.(Ed.)(1987).First and second language acquisition processes.Cambridge, MA:Newbury House.
  34. Pütz, M.(ed.),Niemeier, S. (ed.)(2001).Applied cognitive linguistics: Theory, acquisition and language pedagogy.Mouton de Gruyter:Mouton de Gruyter.
  35. Pütz, M.(ed.),Niemeier, S.(ed.),Dirven, R.(ed.)(2001).Applied cognitive linguistics II: Language pedagogy.Berlin, Germany:Mouton de Gruyter.
  36. Quirk, R.,Greenbaum, S.,Leech, G.,Svartvik, J.(1985).A comprehensive grammar of the English language.London:Longman.
  37. Sharwood-Smith, M.(1993).Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases.Studies in Second Language Acquisition,15,165-179.
  38. Sheen, R.(2007).Key concepts in ELT: Processing instruction.ELT Journal,61,161-163.
  39. Shi, Y.(ed.),Lin, M.(ed.),Brooks, S.(ed.)(2007).Far East English reader.Taipei, Taiwan:Far East Book.
  40. Spada, N.(1997).Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research.Language Teaching,30,73-87.
  41. Swain, M.,Lapkin, S.(1995).Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning.Applied Linguistics,16,371-391.
  42. Tai, J.(ed.),Hsueh, F.(ed.)(1989).Functionalism and Chinese grammar.Milwaukee, WI:Chinese Language Teachers Association.
  43. VanPatten, B.(1996).Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research.Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
  44. VanPatten, B.(2002).Processing instruction: An update.Language Learning,52,755-803.
  45. VanPatten, B.(Ed.)(2004).Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  46. VanPatten, B.,Cadierno, T.(1993).Explicit instruction and input processing.Studies in Second Language Acquisition,15,225-244.
  47. 王寅(2001)。語義理論與語言教學。Shanghai, China:Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press。
E-mail:
文章公開取用時,將寄通知信至您填寫的信箱地址
E-mail:

close

close

加入會員 完全免費

申請成功後您便可使用 airitiLibrary 所提供的個人化服務!

管理我的最愛期刊清單
管理文章下載記錄
管理經常查詢的關鍵字
點數儲值優惠
* 帳號:
請輸入經常使用的電子信箱方便記憶
* 密碼:
限定為6-16個半形大小寫英文字、數字
* 再次輸入密碼:
* 地區:
備用電子信箱:
* 驗證碼:
我已經了解並同意