透過您的圖書館登入
IP:52.14.126.74
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

接受強制診療之性侵害加害人否認型態

Denial Patterns of Sexual Offender under Compulsory Treatment

摘要


目的:探討接受強制診療之性侵害加害人否認型態之集群分析及其社會人口變項在強制治療中之意義。方法:本研究採自編之「否認量表」,以接受強制診療之性侵害加害人47位為研究樣本。再將社會人口、犯罪史、犯行特徵之資料統整,以單因子變異數分析、集群分析等統計方法進行研究。結果:本研究透過集群分析分成三群,分別是A型、B型及C型,每群與人口統計做交叉分析後,再與否認量尺四因素:強暴事件的迷思、加害者的迷思、受害者的迷思、治療中的否認,做單因子變異數分析,結果達統計意義。結論:結果顯示接受強制診療之性侵害加害人其否認型態可分類為:(1)A型:否認型態為對於強暴事件的迷思及加害者的迷思;(2)B型:否認型態為對於受害者的迷思及治療中的否認;(3)C型:在各否認型態的傾向特徵為最不明顯者。

並列摘要


Objective: The aim of this study was to explore sexual offender denial types under compulsory treatment using cluster analysis and demographic data. Methods: The subjects included 47 sexual offense prisoners who accepted compulsory treatment. A Denial Scale questionnaire was administrated to all subjects to collect demographic data, criminal history information and of offense characteristics for further data analysis. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the data. We also used cluster analysis to analyze three groups: type A, type B and type C. Results: No significant differences were found when each group was analyzed by statistical analysis of population. However, one-way ANOVA produced statistical significance for the four factors on the Denial Scale (rape facts myth, sexual offender's myth, victim myth and denial in treatment). Conclusions: The results indicate that sexual offenders under compulsory treatment can be divided into three denial classifications: Type A: denial condition causing rape facts myth and sexual offender's myth; Type B: denial condition causing victim myth and denial in treatment; Type C: denial condition not significant.

並列關鍵字

sexual offenders compulsory treatment denial

參考文獻


Barbaree HE(1991).Denial and minimization among sex offenders: Assessment and treatment outcome.(Forum on Corrections Research).
Brake S,Shannon D(1997).Using pretreatment to increase admission in sex offenders.(Using pretreatment to increase admission in sex offenders).,::Civil Research Institute Press.
Burt MR(1983).Justifying Personal violence: A comparison of rapists and the general public.Int J Victim logy.8,131-50.
Green R(1995).(Comprehensive treatment planning for sex offenders).
Groth AN(1979).(Men who rape).

被引用紀錄


周文如(2011)。性侵害犯罪與保安處分—從強制治療出發〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2011.02352
黃軍義(2014)。敵視女性態度、強暴迷思、與強暴行為教育心理學報45(3),393-412。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20130711.1
蔡坤廷(2010)。對性犯罪人之處遇與控制之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-0309201020251300
白宜庭(2011)。不同類型性侵害犯罪與其問題行為影響因素之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-1502201102395800

延伸閱讀