- 期刊
- OpenAccess
The Available Evidence Suggests the Percent Measure should not be Used to Study Inequality: Reply to Norton and Ariely
並列摘要
In this reply, we reiterate the main point of our 2012 paper, which was that the measure of inequality used by Norton and Ariely (2011) was too difficult for it to yield meaningful results. We describe additional evidence for this conclusion, and we also challenge the conclusion that political differences in perceived and desired inequality are small.
延伸閱讀
- 蕭銘源（2022）。Norton's Material Theory of Induction and the Infinite Regress Problem。哲學與文化，49(5)，7-26。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10158383-202205-202205160003-202205160003-7-26
- Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2013). American's Desire for Less Wealth Inequality does not Depend on how You Ask Them. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(3), 393-394. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=19302975-201305-201306050032-201306050032-393-394
- Tseng, C. H. (2019). Three Essays on Wealth Distribution and Wealth Inequality [doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan University]. Airiti Library. https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201901043
- Chen, Y. C. (2016). Explaining Variations in Income Inequality: A Panel Data Approach [master's thesis, National Taiwan University]. Airiti Library. https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201610461
- 莊希豐、陳亞為（2011）。Threshold Effects of Openness on Income Inequality。經濟研究，47(2)，185-224。https://doi.org/10.29765/TEI.201107.0001