台灣與日本皆在第二次世界大戰後供給了許多公共集合住宅。國民住宅與整建住宅皆為其案例,此些住宅開發均以鄰里單元論為參考。在台灣,活動中心等社區集會設施在法規上並不屬於鄰里設施,然而其實際皆位於鄰里社區中。本研究以台北市整建住宅為案例,從鄰里單元論的觀點出發,探討其與此些鄰里設施、公共設施的可及性。進一步去分析整建住宅開發與鄰里設施的分布是否合理,是否有反映鄰里單元論的精神。本研究首先就台北市整建住宅之基礎建物資訊及公共設施的區位資訊等、透過GIS加以解析。其結果,發現整建住宅與社區活動中心等鄰里設施之間的可及性高,整建住宅的區位條件相當良好。
Taiwan as well as Japan have provided many public housing after the World War II. National housing and resettlement housing are included, and these housing were constructed referring the "neighborhood theory". In Taiwan, community centers are not defined as a neighborhood facility by law, however they actually play the role of it. We try to analyze the accessibility to public facility especially neighborhood facility based on the neighborhood theory and take resettlement housing as case study. First, we collect the basic building data and location data of resettlement housing as well as the location data of public facility and analyze them by GIS. As a consequence, we discovered that resettlement housing are in good location that has high accessibility to public facility.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。